- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SAVE America Act - Interesting take by center-left pundit
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:17 am to Penrod
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:17 am to Penrod
quote:
He believes that the SAVE Act won’t hurt dems in elections because it will suppress a lot of republican voters who are married women with licenses that don’t show their new name.
That is a profoundly ignorant take.
0
Posted on 8/3/26 at 10:53 am to RT1941
quote:
If a married woman doesn't officially change her name at the DMV, then her name remains the same on the voter rolls and she can vote with her existing license.
I don’t know, but remember, we’re talking about 50 states that do this many different ways.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:09 am to AUMIS01
quote:
Just another flavor of black people can't get state IDs to give the sheep something to be upset about.
When I read it, my first thought was about that too.. but then I read it again and thought about the "uneducated maga" BS they come up with, and they're calling Republican women stupid.
It really does smell like the bs thinking that minorities are too stupid to get id lines of the dumbocrats tho.
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 11:10 am
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:13 am to Penrod
quote:
He believes that the SAVE Act won’t hurt dems in elections because it will suppress a lot of republican voters who are married women with licenses that don’t show their new name.
These people are literally retarded. Not surprised the OP would post this moronic take.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:22 am to Riverside
quote:
These people are literally retarded. Not surprised the OP would post this moronic take.
And you responded.
Not only did I post the take, but in my OP I wrote that I disagreed with it. You didn’t seem to understand this because with your level of reading comprehension, this qualifies as nuance.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:25 am to Penrod
A woman does not have to change her last name if she gets married and many women who are professionals, brand, or built a business on their last name do not change their names.
The women who do change their last name are most likely and eager to put in the leg work to get the name changed on legal documents.
The women who do change their last name are most likely and eager to put in the leg work to get the name changed on legal documents.
This post was edited on 8/3/26 at 11:32 am
Posted on 8/3/26 at 11:30 am to Placekicker
quote:
assuming that married women don’t get new licenses.
So we’re assuming that they would change their voter registration but not their DL? Wouldn’t those either happen or not happen together?
Even if true, wouldn’t that equally impact women on the left?
The benefit of restricting mail in ballots and ID at the voting booth would far outweigh any impact from that IMO.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:08 pm to Penrod
Hmmm, fewer women voting, let me think about this a minute.
Posted on 8/3/26 at 12:14 pm to geoag58
quote:
Hmmm, fewer women voting, let me think about this a minute.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News