- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sarah Sanders response to being kicked out of restaurant
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:21 pm to BamaGradinTn
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:21 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
I defend their right to kick her out.
Nominally, but you’re very concerned about the constitution for one and ready to boycott for the other all based on your political sports team. It’s pathetic.
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 7:24 pm
2
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:22 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Funny at the vitriol here but with the gay wedding cake y’all were defending the first amendment
I don’t believe anyone has said she didn’t have the right to refuse Sanders, a patron, service.
The issue is how juvenile and pathetic the action was.
What must it be like to fester in that variety of hate?
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:22 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Funny at the vitriol here but with the gay wedding cake y’all were defending the first amendment
I defend the first amendment in both cases, actually.
Telling, though, how the baker was willing to serve the gay couple under quite a few other circumstances, while the restaurant owner in question here wasn't willing to serve SHS under ANY circumstances.
Also, it's telling how SHS responded as opposed to the plaintiffs in the cake case, ijs.
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:23 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
ready tonoitforl for henother
Don't we all do that?
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:24 pm to EKG
quote:
I don’t believe anyone has said she didn’t have the right to refuse
No, but y’all suddenly aren’t champions of free speech anymore, either.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:24 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
y’all suddenly aren’t champions of free speech anymore, either.
Wrong.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:25 pm to OTIS2
Otis, I relish your opinion of me, pussy.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:25 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
No, but y’all suddenly aren’t champions of free speech anymore, either
I ask again. Did I miss the part where Sarah asked them to set up a Trump themed dinner setting or perhaps cater a trump party? Maybe they left that part out of the story?
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:25 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Nominally
Now you're resorting to lame face saving attempts. That's what's pathetic. There's not one thing "nominal" about protecting free speech here.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:26 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
I defend the first amendment in both cases, actually.
Sort of
Y’all cite 1A immediately in the case of the baker, while here y’all curse the business owner until pressed. Telling.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:26 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
No, but y’all suddenly aren’t champions of free speech anymore, either.
You are incorrect.
I’d protect anyone’s right to FS—in whatever way I could.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:27 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:
Now you're resorting to lame face saving attempts.
Wrong. Y’all have done nothing but bitch and whine here when in the case of the baker it’s a huge constitutional crisis.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
No, but y’all suddenly aren’t champions of free speech anymore, either.
The whole bakery thing is different because they make custom products for their customers
If you don't understand that distinction then I don't know what to tell you
I think businesses should have the right to discriminate. Under existing laws however the owner of the restaurant might be putting themselves in a really bad position. If some black guy wearing a MAGA hat gets refused service there they're going to have a tough time dealing with the fallout. And they're basically begging someone to set them up for that.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:27 pm to EKG
quote:
I’d protect anyone’s right to FS—in whatever way I could.
Only when pressed
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Y’all cite 1A immediately in the case of the baker, while here y’all curse the business owner until pressed. Telling.
You seem uninterested in answering my question
Telling
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
No, but y’all suddenly aren’t champions of free speech anymore, either.
You are a leftist hack. Stop pretending. No one believes your charades. We on the right are fine with Sarah being told to get the frick out. I wish you leftists agreed.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:28 pm to Powerman
quote:
If you don't understand that distinction then I don't know what to tell you
He understands it. That's why he won't answer my question because as per usual he's just a dishonest piece of shite
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:28 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Do you just argue for the sake of arguing?
You’re literally creating a scenario that hasn’t occurred.
You’re literally creating a scenario that hasn’t occurred.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:29 pm to Powerman
quote:
Powerman
Not talking about rights under the law, talking about the general attitude on this board. Most claim to defend the constitution but it’s funny they only come running when their team is under the gun.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:29 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Not talking about rights under the law, talking about the general attitude on this board. Most claim to defend the constitution but it’s funny they only come running when their team is under the gun
Your chicken feathers are showing
This post was edited on 6/23/18 at 7:30 pm
Page 9 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News