- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sarah Sanders response to being kicked out of restaurant
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:29 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:29 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Only when pressed
What does this even mean?
2
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:29 pm to roadGator
quote:
We on the right are fine with Sarah being told to get the frick out.
But not willing to boycott for the business owner when it’s not your team
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:29 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Sort of
Nope. I've not made caveats for one or the other.
quote:
Y’all cite 1A immediately in the case of the baker, while here y’all curse the business owner until pressed. Telling.
Restaurant owner can refuse service to whomever for whatever spurious reason.
What's telling is that there were circumstances the baker was willing to serve the gay couple, but no such considerations made for SHS. You're attempting to make an equivalence in a situation that's apples to oranges.
This isn't about 1A, which I support in both instances. It's about the inequitable circumstances. You know this, and are being purposefully disingenuous.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:30 pm to EKG
quote:
What does this even mean?
Use your brain
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:30 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Not talking about rights under the law, talking about the general attitude on this board. Most claim to defend the constitution but it’s funny they only come running when their team is under the gun.
I suppose you'd have to point out the instances where people should have stood up for the constitution and didn't.
If you can't give an example of that you're just wasting keystrokes that would probably be better spent googling cosplay porn or whatever you're into.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:30 pm to ShortyRob
It's just bizarre, the left has taken over as the enforcers of morality after decades of hating the right for doing just that 
My how times have changed.
My how times have changed.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:30 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I ask again. Did I miss the part where Sarah asked them to set up a Trump themed dinner setting or perhaps cater a trump party? Maybe they left that part out of the story?
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:30 pm to EKG
quote:
What does this even mean?
It means his tenuous logic is running out of places to hide
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:30 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Boycott? Go frick yourself. I have shite to do.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:30 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
You're attempting to make an equivalence in a situation that's apples to oranges.
bullshite
Y’all are partisan hacks and his is yet ANOTHER example
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
I ask again. Did I miss the part where Sarah asked them to set up a Trump themed dinner setting or perhaps cater a trump party? Maybe they left that part out of the story?
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
left has taken over as the enforcers of morality
Im enforcing consistency, not morality
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Y’all are partisan hacks and
Lolololol
Bwahahaha
Douche hack
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:31 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I ask again. Did I miss the part where Sarah asked them to set up a Trump themed dinner setting or perhaps cater a trump party?
You will not receive an honest answer from him on this. That circumstance would make the two situations appropriately equitable, and that's at cross purposes with his goal itt
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:32 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Im enforcing consistency, not morality
On completely different things? That's weird.
I ask again. Did I miss the part where Sarah asked them to set up a Trump themed dinner setting or perhaps cater a trump party? Maybe they left that part out of the story?
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:32 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Use your brain
Ease off.
I don’t understand your comment; no need to be defensive.
“Only when pressed?”
I support free speech, without caveat.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:32 pm to TbirdSpur2010
The point
Your head
Your head
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:32 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Wrong. Y’all have done nothing but bitch and whine here when in the case of the baker it’s a huge constitutional crisis.
Not really. The gay couple in Colorado turned their issue into a huge constitutional crisis...and then didn’t quite get what they wanted.
It’s over, lefties.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:32 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Sort of
Y’all cite 1A immediately in the case of the baker, while here y’all curse the business owner until pressed. Telling.
No, you're just suffering from selective reading comprehension. I don't think anyone here would say that the LGBTQ community wasn't free to engage in what ever personal campaign...boycott, social media campaign, what ever.
Just not attempt to use the government or courts. That's where it becomes unconstitutional
And here's the thing...unlike some posters here, you're smart enough and already know this. You're just choosing to be the idiot here for your own political purposes. Truth be told...you're smarter than this.
Posted on 6/23/18 at 7:32 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
You will not receive an honest answer from him on this. That circumstance would make the two situations appropriately equitable, and that's at cross purposes with his goal itt
Oh I know I won't get an answer from him but I am enjoying highlighting just how dishonest he is
Just a complete piece of shite
Page 10 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News