- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ruth Bader Ginsburg was on the bench for oral arguments today and asking questions
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:37 pm to FredBear
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:37 pm to FredBear
quote:
If the liberal media will actively participate in the Smollett hoax
Reported allegations
Reported updates
Reported it as a potential hoax
You're more of a hack than they are
1
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:39 pm to bmy
quote:
Reported allegations
Reported updates
Reported it as a potential hoax
Spin all you want but the liberal media knew that story was bullshite from the start yet they ran with it anyway.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:42 pm to FredBear
quote:Another embarrasing loon comes into the sunlight
The bitch is dead and there may be someone sitting in her place on the bench but it ain't her.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:44 pm to KCT
quote:Why is it that you people think that others agree with something, just because they understand that thing? "Limited intellect" is my guess.quote:And you think that's a good thing, just because you agree with her radical left-wing views?
She is a justice for life. There is nothing in the Constitution that says she has to be removed if she is hanging on by a thread and can barely lift her head
In any case, this "KCT" seems to be a very excitable little individual.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:44 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Another embarrasing loon comes into the sunlight
Yes, I see you showed up
Posted on 2/19/19 at 4:46 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:Good for her!
Ruth Bader Ginsburg was on the bench for oral arguments today
Seriously.
Odds are that Trump will get a 2nd term. Odds are that RBG will die while Trump is still POTUS. She chose poorly w/ regard to Hillary, and she willing to work herself to death to pay penance. God bless her.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:08 pm to FredBear
quote:I truly get this premise. Let's not forget everyone thinks the GOPe is like a big dumb Romney/Turtle dufus. But they met in secret off some island in Florida to conspire to take the tea party/HFC down. The GOPe redistricted Allen West out.
If the liberal media will actively participate in the Smollett hoax, and they did, they will also participate in a hoax concerning Ginsberg.
The bitch is dead and there may be someone sitting in her place on the bench but it ain't her.
Look at the garbage bill they just spit up on the border wall; and do nothing Paul Ryan that they got to/blackmailed/gave him loads of lake AND beach houses. The entire young guns conservative group is a farce under the guise of conservatives-that is truly evil within itself.
So combine the DNC/MSM and GOPe and we are doomed, surrounded. See the: BS 'bipartisan' bill. The GOPe wants Supreme Court Justice choices though. (Who do you think picked Kavanaugh?) So, for RBG to be dead-- and they use a body double, there has to be a lot more involved than just the DNC/MSM, dirty cop deep state CIA.
Do I think they are evil enough to try it, hell yes. They didn't get away with any of the false flag race-baiting or the recent Jussie race-baiting. Only when Obama was President did they get the headlines they wanted-but not in the long run. No, doubt whatsoever they are conniving, corrupt and evil enough...
If they have gone this far we may as well all take fukitol pills, it's done put a fork in it. (And this is coming from someone who thinks Scalia's death was very suspicious, with no autopsy)
I sadly think --maybe-- one person will be used as a fall guy for all the corrupt sedition and political espionage. No one fricks with their power or gravy train; and I very sadly don't think one outsider President is enough to kill the beast. Not unless a lot of us run for office to get the GOPe out.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:10 pm to cajunangelle
So who's the stand in?
I'm going with Ruth Buzzy.
I'm going with Ruth Buzzy.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:22 pm to goatmilker
here is our fukitall pill
:origin()/pre00/af06/th/pre/i/2016/314/2/b/fukitol_by_milaysvk-dao0avr.png)
Disclaimer: Occasional loose bowels, headache, nausea, dizziness, can't eat, swelling of the labia and genitals, IBS, gas, vertigo, confusion, heart attack, possible death, can't sleep--there's no doubt your in deep.
WARNING only take ONE fukitol and you won't care.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:26 pm to goatmilker
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:28 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
I sadly think --maybe-- one person will be used as a fall guy for all the corrupt sedition and political espionage.
If you really believe that, you're dumber than dirt.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:33 pm to KCT
Being dumber than dirt would be putting all of my hope is some leftist larpy saying, we are the world we are the children and we will beat the beast making bread from 8chan.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:42 pm to cajunangelle
Why have you never answered my one question to you, Cat Woman? Here, I'll give you one more chance:
You participated in the Q thread for at least the first 6 months. Then you did a complete 180, and started bashing all things Q-related.
That's fine, but here's my question. Why did you participate in the Q thread for months, and then say that it was the very first Q post that turned you off?
That makes no sense whatsoever, but up until now you haven't had the courage to explain how you could've enthusiastically participated in something for months that you later said turned you off the very first day.
So, here's one more opportunity. Will you finally explain that gross contradiction now, or will you run away from it once again.
PS - When the 2nd person gets indicted, will you admit that you were wrong yet again?
You participated in the Q thread for at least the first 6 months. Then you did a complete 180, and started bashing all things Q-related.
That's fine, but here's my question. Why did you participate in the Q thread for months, and then say that it was the very first Q post that turned you off?
That makes no sense whatsoever, but up until now you haven't had the courage to explain how you could've enthusiastically participated in something for months that you later said turned you off the very first day.
So, here's one more opportunity. Will you finally explain that gross contradiction now, or will you run away from it once again.
PS - When the 2nd person gets indicted, will you admit that you were wrong yet again?
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:56 pm to KCT
I did explain the whole thing but not to you, to Vox- months ago. Mostly GTMO holding political prisoners because of the renovations on island did me in. It really doesn't matter. I don't care about you and your high horse.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 6:02 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
I did explain the whole thing but not to you, to Vox- months ago. Mostly GTMO holding political prisoners because of the renovations on island did me in. It really doesn't matter. I don't care about you and your high horse.
Liar. You participated in that thread for months, then did a 180 and started bashing Q, and then you explained your about-face by saying it was the very first Q-post that turned you off.
None of which makes any sense. But, at least you're consistent. You're still too much of a COWARD to explain your ridiculous contradiction.
I won't bother you anymore about it. Go feed your 14 cats so you can get ready to watch Wheel of Fortune.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 6:04 pm to KCT
Scientology likes to harass former members too. Did Q say anything about that? Trust Miscaviage.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 6:06 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
Body double.
She
D
E
A
D
She
D
E
A
D
Posted on 2/19/19 at 6:15 pm to KCT
quote:I could go on for 17 paragraphs about how Q is pulling your chain. Was HRC locked up two years ago in November as Q outright said?
Liar. You participated in that thread for months, then did a 180 and started bashing Q, and then you explained your about-face by saying it was the very first Q-post that turned you off.
None of which makes any sense. But, at least you're consistent. You're still too much of a COWARD to explain your ridiculous contradiction.
I won't bother you anymore about it. Go feed your 14 cats so you can get ready to watch Wheel of Fortune.
This post was edited on 2/19 at 6:04 pm
I already fed my cats (LIVE video footage below) and I watch Lou Dobbs @ 7. If I see another Q in my toast I will be sure to call Jeane Dixon to consult. TYVM.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 2/19/19 at 6:19 pm to KCT
Dude, I’ve always enjoyed reading CA’s posts, whether I agreed with them or not.
Why the hatred? Eveyone should be able to agree or disagree as it suits them.
Why the hatred? Eveyone should be able to agree or disagree as it suits them.
Posted on 2/19/19 at 6:25 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Scientology likes to harass former members too. Did Q say anything about that? Trust Miscaviage.
I'm not harassing her. As usual she started the bullshite between us today. I don't give a damn that she no longer believes Q is legit. I'm just asking her to explain why her reason for changing her mind doesn't make sense.
And, one last time. My only contention in this thread is that an 86 year-old Supreme Court justice who has had 3 major health issues in 3 months, and basically hasn't been heard from since Thanksgiving, could clear up her health status by doing one short interview.
How in the world is that some sort of controversial idea?
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News