- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Russian bounty story completely out of news cycle and forgotten. That’s not good enough
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:11 pm
We need consequences for nyt and others for the false reporting
You can’t tell American people that US intel confirmed that Russia was paying bounties for the heads of our troops and then silently retract.
Americans deserve to be told the truth that the reporting wasn’t entirely correct
In any other industry, massive screw ups usually mean consequences
Nyt May have harmed us policy and nothing will happen to anyone
You can’t tell American people that US intel confirmed that Russia was paying bounties for the heads of our troops and then silently retract.
Americans deserve to be told the truth that the reporting wasn’t entirely correct
In any other industry, massive screw ups usually mean consequences
Nyt May have harmed us policy and nothing will happen to anyone
This post was edited on 7/13/20 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:14 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
We will never see anyone at the top pay for any of their crimes.
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:29 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
That story got real quit once it was revealed Schift was briefed earlier this year and said nothing
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:32 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
What the NYT and others did was criminal imo.
The media is the enemy of the people.
The media is the enemy of the people.
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:38 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
What is it about the original story that doesn’t still stand? I think it’s been pretty much confirmed that the intel was put in the PDB, it was briefed to our allies, raids were conducted based on some of the intel, etc.
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:40 pm to Decatur
quote:
been pretty much confirmed
Yall almost had him again... damn it must suck to be wrong so often...
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:42 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Did the NYT writers who received Pulitzer Prizes on their Mueller SC Trump/Russia collusion fake stories ever return those prestigious awards......
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:48 pm to Decatur
quote:
What is it about the original story that doesn’t still stand? I think it’s been pretty much confirmed that the intel was put in the PDB, it was briefed to our allies, raids were conducted based on some of the intel, etc.
The cia Director has said it was raw intelligence that has yet to be confirmed.
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:50 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
The cia Director
Yeah, but OMB and it isn't fair...
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:53 pm to Decatur
quote:
What is it about the original story that doesn’t still stand? I think it’s been pretty much confirmed that the intel was put in the PDB, it was briefed to our allies, raids were conducted based on some of the intel, etc.
This is so disappointing coming from you
Our generals have come out and said they don’t believe it based on evidence they have seen
Colin Powell went on msnbc and claimed it was “hysterical”
Trump was never verbally briefed by our agencies on it, like the nyt originally reported.
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:54 pm to LuckyTiger
Haspel didn’t comment on anything specific. Just some vague language about intelligence assessments.
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:56 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I was reading another article from NYT that was basically stating that ok. Trump might not have been briefed on "bounties" but thats because they arent called "bounties".
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:56 pm to Decatur
Decatur, why is it completely out of news cycle then? Why did schiff et al stop talking about it?
The NYT was wayyyyy too definitive in their original story. That’s what I am saying.
Are you claiming our Middle East generals are lying?
The NYT was wayyyyy too definitive in their original story. That’s what I am saying.
Are you claiming our Middle East generals are lying?
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:56 pm to Decatur
quote:
Haspel didn’t comment on anything specific.
Other than to say that the intelligence was not verified, meaning to anyone without an agenda and half a brain that it was not actionable intelligence...
Yet, you even made a claim above that "raids were conducted" based on the intelligence...
Pathetic doesn't even begin to describe you...
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:57 pm to Decatur
quote:
original story
quote:
pretty much confirmed
quote:
conducted based on some of the intel
Absolutely airtight evidence trail that should topple any POTUS without thinking twice about it. Bring on the gallows and then to the guillotine just to be sure the evil is stopped.
Posted on 7/13/20 at 2:58 pm to Decatur
quote:
Haspel didn’t comment on anything specific. Just some vague language about intelligence assessments.
Agreed, It was “vague” enough to perpetuate the narrative OMB, then on to the next lie.
Posted on 7/13/20 at 3:04 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
NYT said it was briefed to Trump. Putting it in the PDB doesn’t count?
I thought I saw someone report that Bolton gave him a verbal briefing about it at some point anyway.
I say the NYT report has been holding up.
I thought I saw someone report that Bolton gave him a verbal briefing about it at some point anyway.
I say the NYT report has been holding up.
Posted on 7/13/20 at 3:20 pm to Decatur
quote:
I thought
quote:
has been holding up.
quote:
NYT said
How much do you get paid to post stupid shite like this?
Posted on 7/13/20 at 3:40 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
This is so disappointing coming from you
How is that possible , he’s lying scum.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News