- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Russia hacked GOP affiliated targets as well, per intell report.
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:17 am to germandawg
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:17 am to germandawg
Russia at least has some imperial inclination that sees the value of nurturing Christianity and the benefit of taking aggression against Islamic terrorism....
The US has become a socialist quagmire.....
sorry, you have no power here shill.
The US has become a socialist quagmire.....
sorry, you have no power here shill.
3
Posted on 1/7/17 at 11:24 am to ladyluckUGA
quote:We're in the socialist quagmire while Russia is run by a high ranking ex-KGB Agent from the former SOVIET Union?
Russia at least has some imperial inclination that sees the value of nurturing Christianity and the benefit of taking aggression against Islamic terrorism....
The US has become a socialist quagmire.....
sorry, you have no power here shill.
This post was edited on 1/7/17 at 11:47 am
Posted on 1/7/17 at 3:05 pm to buckeye_vol
Putin- KGB agent- bad, bad, bad
Bush- CIA Director- good,good,good
Two spy organizations that do the same shite against each other but having been a former agent of KGB is somehow different than being fricking Director of CIA. Okay for one to become chief executive of their country but terrible for the other. Got it champ!
Bush- CIA Director- good,good,good
Two spy organizations that do the same shite against each other but having been a former agent of KGB is somehow different than being fricking Director of CIA. Okay for one to become chief executive of their country but terrible for the other. Got it champ!
Posted on 1/7/17 at 3:08 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Right. That's coming. (Blackmail)
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:09 am to Dick Leverage
quote:
I am never shocked at accusations of Dem/progressive corruption. So, you are correct that we were not shocked. It is just that we never had anyway to confirm the suspicions until the emails were released. Things that you and your ilk would always counter with a claim of "conspiracy theory" were finally confirmed.
Provide an example of anything you have learned from the emails that anyone with any sense at all didn't already know...there is nothing there...the things you are talking about weren't denied by anyone because they are meaningless. What one email revelation and in which email is a good example of something that anyone didn't already know?
Anybody?
Y'all are all feigning outrage and most people merely accept that the emails revealed something sinister when none of them have....they haven't bothered to read them and if they did wouldn't know what to make of them until someone told them what to make of them because there is nothing there...
But one example...just one....lets dissect it and we will see that there is nothing there...none of you will because any of you capable of making an sound argument know I am right and any of you who aren't will have to wait for someone to make it for you...
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:13 am to ladyluckUGA
quote:
The US has become a socialist quagmire.....
One example please...one only...and I will leave for ever...
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:13 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Well then obviously the American people have rejected how modern campaigns are run.
Technically, a minority of the American people rejected it
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:17 am to germandawg
quote:A far more progressive tax code than Sweden
One example please...one only...and I will leave for ever...
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:23 am to clooneyisgod
quote:
Technically, a minority of the American people rejected it
Technically, a minority of the people that voted rejected it.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:34 am to germandawg
quote:Then what in the world is the hullaballoo about?
Nothing that any thinking adult who has watched politics for more than one cycle was truly shocked by..
If the truthful revelations CNN provided HRC with debate questions in advance, of the stupidity of wiping Hillary's Toilet Server, etc. had no effect, then WTF is the big deal?
Obama claimed to aim for the most transparent administration ever. Horrendous handling of security by Hillary, Podesta, the DNC, etc. seemed to aid him in attaining that goal. There is little more transparent than giving password access to 10yrs of emails. If Russia was the vessel to help Obama achieve his goal, they should be thanked.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:42 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
A far more progressive tax code than Sweden
Explain how that is an example of socialism please...this ought to be funn...errr....interesting.
And then keep in mind that someone has to pay for Sweden's national security and that of the entire world....or at least that is what we have told since the end of the second world war...and then look at a map of Northern Europe and then expand that map a little to the east and you will see the 800 pound canary sitting squarely in the front room of your failed assertion that a progressive tax code is an example of socialism....
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:51 am to germandawg
quote:Wow.
A far more progressive tax code than Sweden
Explain how that is an example of socialism please.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:56 am to germandawg
quote:
A far more progressive tax code than Sweden Explain how that is an example of socialism please...this ought to be funn...errr....interesting.
Oh boy! Time to start redefining words now.
This will be fun!
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:03 am to LSURussian
quote:
A far more progressive tax code than Sweden
Explain how that is an example of socialism please.
Wow.
So you can't explain how, right?
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:03 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
quote:
A far more progressive tax code than Sweden Explain how that is an example of socialism please...this ought to be funn...errr....interesting.
Oh boy! Time to start redefining words now.
This will be fun!
And yet another one unable to state their side....
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:06 am to LSURussian
A progressive tax rate being "socialism" - now that's rich. I guess one person's "socialism" is another person's bankruptcy, eh? I mean, when Trump's business filed for multiple bankruptcies - which resulted in wiping out millions of dollars of debt - isn't that socialism? What that does is have others (the suppliers, contractors, workers) have to take pennies on the dollar - if that - instead of the full amount owed. In other words (follow me closely here) they are sharing the risk that Trump's businesses encountered in his big business deals. Sure sounds like socialism to me. And really, where is the "risk" that the brave capitalist Trump took on ... if in the end, via multiple bankruptcies, he can force others to suffer the consequences of his shitty deals that lost hundreds of millions?
Hypocrites, the lot of you.
Hypocrites, the lot of you.
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:07 am to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
quote:
A far more progressive tax code than Sweden Explain how that is an example of socialism please...this ought to be funn...errr....interesting.
Oh boy! Time to start redefining words now.
This will be fun!
So you disagree with the president elect on this issue??
Trump:
"“We’ve had a graduated tax system for many years, so it’s not a socialistic thing."
GOP Candidate Debate, September 2016
That's your boys words, not mine....not a very compelling argument but I think we all agree that Trump ain't exactly a word smith....
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:09 am to germandawg
quote:Yes, I can. But it would be a waste. You'd just deflect or use a straw man tactic like you always do.
So you can't explain how, right?
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:11 am to LSURussian
quote:
quote:
So you can't explain how, right?
Yes, I can. But it would be a waste. You'd just deflect or use a straw man tactic like you always do.
No you can't...you do not possess the ability to prove something that you know damn well is not provable...and you are also unable to be intellectually honest enough to admit your inability to do so...
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:11 am to germandawg
quote:
No you can't...you do not possess the ability to prove something that you know damn well is not provable...
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News