- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ruh-Roh: Interview that did not age well for Odumbf*ck....
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:26 am to SuperSaint
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:26 am to SuperSaint
Never go full Walt
0
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:26 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
SFP working hard to defend
Lol no
quote:
when he worked this hard to argue that the case in GA was "the strongest one against Trump"?
Wrong again
That was always the obstruction -related charges in Florida
This post was edited on 7/31/25 at 8:28 am
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That doesn't answer his question.
You stupid, stupid, retarded frick.
Obama knew that it was bullshite fraudulent opposition research strictly done for campaign purposes. No one at this point has to “prove” that Obama knew that EVERYTHING in the dossier was untrue. If anything, it would be up to Obama and his sycophants to show that they had done some sort of an investigation to "prove" the allegations in the dossier in order to have used it in a manner in which they did.
Given what Obama knew about the document and the fact that he sat on it that information throughout the election (despite Hillary fraudulently using it in the campaign) would preclude anyone with such knowledge from using it as a predicate to launch a multi-year, multimillion dollar investigation/witch hunt. A fraudulent investigation that attempted to overthrow a duly elected president. Not to mention, using it to get a fraudulent FISA warrants to spy on your political opponent.
I’m sure there were some things in the document that were "true." For instance, perhaps Obama did stay in the presidential suite at the Moscow Ritz. But, given what Obama knew about the dossier and it’s provenance, you’d have to be one severely retarded frick (or a Lake Charles hack divorce lawyer) to think "beyond a reasonable doubt“ that Obama didn’t commit conspiracy in his fraudulent use of the dossier.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:30 am to SlowFlowPro
SFP thinks Charles Manson is a decent guy because he didn’t actually stab anyone.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:35 am to BurlesonCountyAg
And all this along with all the other BS they have done to DT has just made him more popular and more powerfull.
Everything the retard libs do backfires on them with Trump.
The uniparty has been destroyed. Amazing to stop and think about exactly what Trump has disrupted. No way he could have pulled this off his first term. HE now has control to straighten this mess out.
Everything the retard libs do backfires on them with Trump.
The uniparty has been destroyed. Amazing to stop and think about exactly what Trump has disrupted. No way he could have pulled this off his first term. HE now has control to straighten this mess out.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:40 am to MMauler
People say Trump is his own worst enemy because of his big mouth and giant ego (and at times he certainly is), but these people can give OMB a run for his money.
They were literally bragging about what they did to Trump, because they believed that no one would dare do a thing to them.
They were literally bragging about what they did to Trump, because they believed that no one would dare do a thing to them.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:44 am to Penrod
quote:
You might be able to prove that someone warned him that it wasn’t reliable, but that does not prove that Obama didn’t believe some of it was. You would have to have a recording of him saying, “I know it’s fake, but I’m going to use it anyway because I want to cripple Trump’s ability to govern.” And he didn’t say anything like that.
Or you can just use common sense. When Obama is briefed that the Russians aren't doing anything, and that info was intentionally pulled from the official briefing, and Obama instructed them to rewrite the evaluation to completely go against the prior evidence, anyone with a brain can figure out what went on.
Never in the history of the world has the standard for proof been, "Well, he didn't explicitly admit he did it, so we have to let him go." We have circumstantial evidence and testimony from witnesses that doesn't require an admission of guilt from the perp.
It's absurd to think that the only usable evidence is the kenyan's own words.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:50 am to TenWheelsForJesus
I think this is a valid concern. No way Brennan is cut off from the beast.
Catch him, don't announce it or tell Bongino/Solomon to whine about it.
JUST DO IT-then add a classified info charge, as his security clearance and ability to walk in a federal building was cut off.
Catch him, don't announce it or tell Bongino/Solomon to whine about it.
JUST DO IT-then add a classified info charge, as his security clearance and ability to walk in a federal building was cut off.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:53 am to SlowFlowPro
I am shocked that you provide legal counsel to anyone.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 8:57 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
And both Michelle and Barry would go crazy with that kind of heat.
Be funny if Trump was responsible for getting Barry and Moochelle back together again.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 9:09 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
No, just his administration was hobbled from the very start which was the intent of this new “assessment” ordered by then President Obama. And he has subsequently fought that narrative from the time the Washington Post story broke to this very day.
Yes, that’s true. Unfortunately, Obama can’t be hurt that way. But Trump can harass him such that he is inconvenienced and such that his reputation takes a blow. He can’t convict him, though, or even take him to trial.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 9:14 am to MMauler
quote:
According to John Solomon, new documents that have just been discovered show
All of this fits well with what I think happened, but if you try to take this to trial, and lawyers start taking depositions and examining documents, all of those “according to” and “documents show” are going to disappear into the ether.
Remember when Adam Schiff told us he had personally seen the documents that would easily send Trump to jail? Remember when Sydney Powell told us she had personally seen the documents that proved the election was stolen? When she was going to release the Kraken and restore the Trump Presidency?
Posted on 7/31/25 at 9:15 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
SFP working hard to defend Democrats this morning!
He’s not defending Democrats. He is telling you that there is no case against Obama. He is telling you facts that you don’t want to hear.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 9:45 am to Penrod
quote:Obama cannot be hurt in any way. He has very carefully insulated himself from any degree of culpability. That is absolutely true.
…Obama can’t be hurt that way.
Obama is convinced that he was right in what he did. And nothing will ever change that.
Posted on 7/31/25 at 10:31 am to MMauler
quote:
No one at this point has to “prove” that Obama knew that EVERYTHING in the dossier was untrue.
If you're talking criminal prosecution, you do.
quote:
If anything, it would be up to Obama and his sycophants to show that they had done some sort of an investigation to "prove" the allegations in the dossier in order to have used it in a manner in which they did.
Based on what?
As I posted, this decision may not even be reviewable by courts.
quote:
the fact that he sat on it that information throughout the election (despite Hillary fraudulently using it in the campaign) would preclude anyone with such knowledge from using it as a predicate to launch a multi-year, multimillion dollar investigation/witch hunt.
The investigation that was started by Trump's DOJ?
Posted on 7/31/25 at 10:34 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
. When Obama is briefed that the Russians aren't doing anything, and that info was intentionally pulled from the official briefing, and Obama instructed them to rewrite the evaluation to completely go against the prior evidence, anyone with a brain can figure out what went on.
Obama is the head of the agency. What prevents him, legally, from pursuing this angle and telling his subservients to create that report?
What he says IS the agency's position on the issue, correct?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News