- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rittenhouse Day 4 of deliberation: Not Guilty on all counts...He is Free!!!
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:31 am to DeathValley85
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:31 am to DeathValley85
Will they deliberate Saturday and Sunday if no verdict today?
1
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:31 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
A crusader on either side is a problem.
Someone 'crusading' for acquittal is simply deciding based on the evidence and facts presented.
You're making it sound like someone not willing to budge on acquitting kyle is no different than someone not willing to budge on convicting him.
Surely that's not what you meant, right?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:32 am to MFn GIMP
quote:
Today is the day for the hung jury on all counts.
I tend to agree. All bad news for the MSM tends to come at 4:00 on Friday afternoons when people check out.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:34 am to Centinel
Rittenhouse went into this with a stacked deck against him. A semi competent Prosecutor convicts him. I guess we forgot what the jury did to Chauvin and is willing to do with Rittenhouse.
For the defense a hung jury is as good as an acquittal, then the judge will drop his nuke that he has stored in his back pocket.
For the defense a hung jury is as good as an acquittal, then the judge will drop his nuke that he has stored in his back pocket.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:34 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
. A crusader on either side is a problem.
i disagree. i want a crusader for "not guilty" that has to be completely and utterly convinced on every single trial, whether it's Rittenhouse, OJ, Chauvin, or whoever.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:39 am to Jcpau
quote:
Will they deliberate Saturday and Sunday if no verdict today?
No Packers vs Vikings is their Iron Bowl
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:40 am to 3nOut
quote:
a crusader
I would guess that the person meant crusader in the sense of someone who wasn’t looking at the facts and was deciding on outside opinions or information or predisposed biases.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:41 am to sms151t
quote:
Rittenhouse went into this with a stacked deck against him. A semi competent Prosecutor convicts him. I guess we forgot what the jury did to Chauvin and is willing to do with Rittenhouse.
I don't see how Chauvin is relevant in this. Chauvin helped kill a black guy which started off the summer of riots that everyone wanted over and done with. It also occurred in one of the most liberal parts of the country.
Rittenhouse shot 3 white rioters, two of which are stone cold proven self defense situations. The only real issue the defense has is Rosenbaum, who was erratic and shouting the N bomb.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:42 am to weadjust
quote:
No Packers vs Vikings is their Iron Bowl
not for Kenoshans
Kenosha is <1.5 hour drive from Chicago & <2.5 hour drive from Green Bay
I imagine Packers/Bears is the bigger Packer rivalry down that way than Packers/Vikings
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:43 am to Centinel
quote:
Someone 'crusading' for acquittal is simply deciding based on the evidence and facts presented.
Let's be honest, that is not necessarily the case.
You and I may think he is not guilty based on the evidence we have seen, but that doesn't mean it's impossible for there to be a juror who had their mind made up that he is Not Guilty before this thing started.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:44 am to rt3
Legal Bytes is here 
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:44 am to SG_Geaux
so?
If the evidence clearly supports that bias, what's the difference?
If the evidence clearly supports that bias, what's the difference?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:45 am to rt3
quote:
Legal Bytes is here
More revealing clothing is needed.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:46 am to Jcorye1
Chauvin case is very relevant to this in terms of juries and wanting to send messages. Just as in the Chauvin case, there was enough evidence and clear evidence that he did not commit murder, but the jury made its mind up before being sat.
This case, there is clear evidence of Self Defense, but the jury wants to convict, a non idiot prosecution would have convicted Rittenhouse easily.
This case, there is clear evidence of Self Defense, but the jury wants to convict, a non idiot prosecution would have convicted Rittenhouse easily.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:47 am to the808bass
quote:
I would guess that the person meant crusader in the sense of someone who wasn’t looking at the facts and was deciding on outside opinions or information or predisposed biases.
i didn't mean i want somebody belligerent against the truth or any evidence ever convincing them, but somebody who walks in and says I am going vote not guilty unless there is just irrevocable evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt.
if i'm in rittenhouse's shoes, i'd pray for somebody like that on my jury.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:52 am to 3nOut
So, they just caught fatboy and the state in another lie.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:54 am to TDTOM
quote:
So, they just caught fatboy and the state in another lie.
What do you mean? I can not watch it anywhere...
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 9:55 am
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:56 am to TDTOM
quote:
So, they just caught fatboy and the state in another lie.
What?
Posted on 11/19/21 at 9:57 am to sms151t
quote:
What do you mean? I can not watch it anywhere...
The state said they didn't know who dropped off the drone video and just found out last week it was Brandon Beaman. However, Brandon Beaman was on the state's witness list from the beginning. So, they knew all along.
Posted on 11/19/21 at 10:01 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
it's impossible for there to be a juror who had their mind made up that he is Not Guilty before this thing started.
Considering we've all seen all the evidence presented a few days after it occurred over a year ago, you think coming to the conclusion that Kyle acted in self defense is problematic? That makes someone a 'crusader' along the lines of someone who's decided Kyle was guilty despite having seen all the evidence prior to the trial starting?
Page 3 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News