0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rittenhouse Charges..and lessers coming
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:23 am to Herooftheday
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:23 am to Herooftheday
First shot was to the dick.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:24 am to Herooftheday
quote:
Dang ok. Like 3 in the chest once in the noggin? I'll have to go back and see that part
One in the pelvis, one in the hand, one in the back and one grazed the head.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:25 am to TheAlmightySmash
quote:
Doesn't a reckless misdemeanor mean he can't use self defense as an excuse? I thought I read somewhere that there's a lesser charge that could f him over
You can't claim self defense if you are in commission of a crime. But I don't think that will apply because it was a technical crime. A child can use a gun in self defense in the home and kill the intruder. That's self defense all day long.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:25 am to RealDawg
quote:
FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON - Unknown glowing man
FIFY
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:28 am to RealDawg
It's too late to add charges now.
This would have had to have been done prior to the case.
This would have had to have been done prior to the case.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:29 am to TDTOM
quote:
One in the pelvis, one in the hand, one in the back and one grazed the head.
You could almost do that with one shot if he grabbed the barrel and had his head back just right.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:31 am to Homesick Tiger
quote:
But how does a defendant get to defend himself against said charges when filed at the last minute?
It’s bullshite but common. It is impossible to commit the greater offense without committing the lesser one.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:32 am to hogcard1964
quote:
It's too late to add charges now. This would have had to have been done prior to the case.
Nope. Can add lessers before it heads to jury. They aren’t “new” they are lessers.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:32 am to TheAlmightySmash
Essentially that’s why the prosecution was desperate to get that pic in. If they can get the jury to believe Kyle was the aggressor by raising his weapon, it wipes out self defense in every instance. So even though he takes a skateboard to the head or has a gun pointed at him, he can’t legally claim self defense. Their problem is that no one testified to Kyle ever being aggressive or threatening. The state also didn’t bring up Ziminski to testify that Kyle raised his weapon at him, which if he did you’d think you’d want him in court testifying to that fact
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:33 am to RealDawg
Are we in court today?
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:35 am to RealDawg
The judge - Schroeder (spelling?) would have to agree to it.
It's rare to begin with and this judge definitely won't allow it.
It's rare to begin with and this judge definitely won't allow it.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:36 am to TDTOM
quote:
grazed the head.
Damn, I was hoping for pink mist.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:39 am to Blizzard of Chizz
I have never watched a trial but I caught a fair amount of this one. My impression of the judicial system is not good. It seems like justice takes a back seat to egos, money and complicated rules. How an average person gets justice, I am not sure.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:48 am to Tigers2010a
They have to be unanimous to convict right? What about to acquit?
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:49 am to TDTOM
Maybe you get him for something like a reckless discharge,but that is about it.
What you need to be on the lookout for is the US Attorney if this case ends in not guilty across the board. Something tells me there will be a federal civil rights violation coming.
What you need to be on the lookout for is the US Attorney if this case ends in not guilty across the board. Something tells me there will be a federal civil rights violation coming.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:50 am to RealDawg
That's bullshite. Doesn't a defense attorney base his whole defense and arguments on the charges in front of him? How can you add a bunch of crap in at the last minute that the defense may or may not have addressed based on original charges? This will wrap the jury around the axle if allowed.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:50 am to TDTOM
Yes and yes
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:51 am to Herooftheday
quote:
Must have missed this. 4 shots on the first guy?
This is ONE of the most shocking things I learned during my watch of the trial the past 2 days.
Didn't spend any time previously watching videos - just what was shown on newscasts. Never did I sense more than one shot fired - and I don't remember any news source reporting it. must have ignored the multiple shots as being all part of the background noise.
The most SERIOUS thing I learned is that there was ZERO evidence available to warrant an indictment for anything other than some bullshite misdemeanor. = breaking curfew along with another 200000 unindicted thugs.
State and County and City and DAoffice and individuals all up and down the line need to be sued into bankrupt disgrace for this. Along with liars in the media and all politicians who maliciously distorted the issue for political capital.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:54 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
breaking curfew
This charge was dropped.
Posted on 11/12/21 at 9:54 am to KiwiHead
How would you get him on reckless discharge thigh? He didn’t fire off dozens of rounds. He fired 8 in total 6 of which hit the intended target. His only missed were the two at jump kick man. He was very precise and not spraying and praying
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News