- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RFK- keto diet as cure for schizophrenia
Posted on 2/5/26 at 5:37 pm to TigerDoc
Posted on 2/5/26 at 5:37 pm to TigerDoc
RFK didn’t reference the data associated with two individuals as a matter of setting national policy.
Fauci made broad statements of fact based on incomplete (and often flat out incorrect) data sets and used it to dictate the actions of 330 million people. Or at least the attempt was made.
And none of the self proclaimed medial experts in this thread had a problem with it despite what they may claim now.
Fauci made broad statements of fact based on incomplete (and often flat out incorrect) data sets and used it to dictate the actions of 330 million people. Or at least the attempt was made.
And none of the self proclaimed medial experts in this thread had a problem with it despite what they may claim now.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 5:41 pm to SallysHuman
Yeah.
This is about as reasonable a place as this conversation can land (on the poliboard at least
), honestly. You’re holding three ideas at once here that usually get pulled apart:
1. genuine hope that new approaches might help people
2. realism about adherence and human behavior, and
3. awareness that messenger identity now warps how ideas are received
Your point about adherence is underrated. Even when medications clearly help, sticking with them is hard. Sustained dietary change is often harder still. That doesn’t mean it’s not worth studying - but it does mean “cure” talk skips past some very real human constraints.
What’s frustrating is that once an idea is tied to a polarizing figure, it stops being evaluated on its own terms. The same claim said by a different person would trigger a completely different conversation. That’s not great for figuring out what actually helps people.
This is about as reasonable a place as this conversation can land (on the poliboard at least
1. genuine hope that new approaches might help people
2. realism about adherence and human behavior, and
3. awareness that messenger identity now warps how ideas are received
Your point about adherence is underrated. Even when medications clearly help, sticking with them is hard. Sustained dietary change is often harder still. That doesn’t mean it’s not worth studying - but it does mean “cure” talk skips past some very real human constraints.
What’s frustrating is that once an idea is tied to a polarizing figure, it stops being evaluated on its own terms. The same claim said by a different person would trigger a completely different conversation. That’s not great for figuring out what actually helps people.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 5:45 pm to lurking
I think this is closer to agreement than I expected. Different scope, different stakes - but the same underlying rule - authority plus certainty changes behavior, so it has to be used carefully. Thanks for being a good sport.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 5:50 pm to TigerDoc
quote:Seems to me he likely intended "a non-SAD diet - in addition to being overall good for you - might actually hold promise in attenuating mental illnesses, even severe ones."
So for me, the problem isn’t simply “what did he intend?”
Posted on 2/5/26 at 5:54 pm to Big Scrub TX
That's plausible, but like Spidey says, "with great power comes great responsibility". If you say the COVID vaccine "protects" people will project into that and same goes for "cure". There's a lot of nuance lost in the lossy compression of language.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:02 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
That's plausible, but like Spidey says, "with great power comes great responsibility". If you say the COVID vaccine "protects" people will project into that and same goes for "cure". There's a lot of nuance lost in the lossy compression of language.
I honestly don’t think RFKjr could say anything that wouldn’t be clipped and twisted… that’s a large part of the problem. Sides are already picked and the opposition already disagrees before he says the first word.
Instead of discussing the full benefits of a healthy diet, or even debating what constitutes a healthy diet, this thread devolved into whether two people with positive outcomes even matters. Levels of evidence. How crazy and stupid RFKjr is, etc…
That is a problem that goes beyond how precisely crafted RFKjr’s language is. He could tout the benefits of hydration and we’d be talking lead levels in Flint Michigan and cases of water induced death.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:10 pm to TigerDoc
quote:Sure. But certainly we've learned to stop clutching our pearls at our imperfect messengers at this late date, no?
That's plausible, but like Spidey says, "with great power comes great responsibility". If you say the COVID vaccine "protects" people will project into that and same goes for "cure". There's a lot of nuance lost in the lossy compression of language.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:25 pm to Big Scrub TX
For sure. at this point, no one is asking for angels. Just something that works well enough under battlefield conditions.
The trouble is that language doesn’t degrade gracefully. When it loses precision, it doesn’t just get fuzzy - it gets reassigned.
“Protects” sounds reassuring until people discover it doesn’t mean what they imported into it. Then suddenly the problem isn’t imperfect messengers - it’s betrayal.
Which is why it’s still worth fussing about words - not because we expect purity, but because expectations have a habit of showing up later with invoices.
The trouble is that language doesn’t degrade gracefully. When it loses precision, it doesn’t just get fuzzy - it gets reassigned.
“Protects” sounds reassuring until people discover it doesn’t mean what they imported into it. Then suddenly the problem isn’t imperfect messengers - it’s betrayal.
Which is why it’s still worth fussing about words - not because we expect purity, but because expectations have a habit of showing up later with invoices.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:32 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Which is why it’s still worth fussing about words - not because we expect purity, but because expectations have a habit of showing up later with invoices.
Problem is the general populace worldwide doesn't care about "words" and their meanings.
We are getting more stupid as a population; general distrust in healthcare industry and politics being intertwined into everything is at an all time high.
Most Drs that are out that are absolute idiots when it comes to talking to people so why should their patients care (oh wait up they generally dont).
Its awful. COVID did absolutely no favors to nurses, drs, politicians...but alot of them chose their own graves.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 6:34 pm
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:37 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Let’s use logic. If someone with schz is “listening” and have the wherewithal to want to ge better and they try the diet and it doesn’t work, they will try the next thing because they will still want to get better. If they don’t have the wherewithal to want to get better, it doesn’t fricking matter anyway.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:39 pm to TigerDoc
quote:I'm actively seeking wrecking balls at this point. Institutionalized medicine has been an abject failure. (I'm speaking of chronic care. Acute care is spectacular. For chronic conditions, we haven't even budged in 100 years).
For sure. at this point, no one is asking for angels. Just something that works well enough under battlefield conditions.
The trouble is that language doesn’t degrade gracefully. When it loses precision, it doesn’t just get fuzzy - it gets reassigned.
“Protects” sounds reassuring until people discover it doesn’t mean what they imported into it. Then suddenly the problem isn’t imperfect messengers - it’s betrayal.
Which is why it’s still worth fussing about words - not because we expect purity, but because expectations have a habit of showing up later with invoices.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:42 pm to BBONDS25
The best is the big media push for TD meds. TD is a side affect of psychiatric drugs that treat things like depression and suicidal thoughts. Guess what the side affects of the TD drug are? You guessed it. Depression and suicidal thoughts.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 6:43 pm
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:44 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
The best is the big media push for TD meds. TD is a side affect of psychiatric drugs that treat things like depression and suicidal thoughts. Guess what the side affects of the TD drug are? You guessed it. Depression and suicidal thoughts.
Circle jerk (jerk, jerk, jerk) of despair.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:45 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
Let’s use logic. If someone with schz is “listening” and have the wherewithal to want to ge better and they try the diet and it doesn’t work, they will try the next thing because they will still want to get better
As if an unmedicated schizophrenic believes they have a mental illness.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:49 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
As if an unmedicated schizophrenic believes they have a mental illness.
The owls in graduation hats and monocles flying around my head wont stop telling me to harm others and nobody else seems sees them.
They keep asking how many licks to the center of tootsie pop too
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:50 pm to gaetti15
quote:
They keep asking how many licks to the center of tootsie pop too
3
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:51 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
SallysHuman
Stop it owl
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:57 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Why do psychiatrists and psychologists wish to see blood tests if diet is not to be considered?
Because bloods can tell a doctor that the patient acting crazy isn't actually crazy but drunk - you can tell that from a blood test. Of course that almost certainly would be obviou before, but that was just a simple example
Also your bloods determine what medicine you can be given. Some medicine is great but does a number on your Kidneys or Liver and if you already have ciirrhosis, a course of medicine X might kill you....and the doctor does not want to kill you.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:21 pm to 4cubbies
16 pages of nonsense, did anyone actually lookup “ketogenic diet” and “seizure”?
You’d be shocked. It’s not some nonsense RFK came up with. We’ve know for a while.
Pubmed
Seizures again
Yeah, I chat searched it. Sue me.
You’d be shocked. It’s not some nonsense RFK came up with. We’ve know for a while.
Pubmed
Seizures again
Yeah, I chat searched it. Sue me.
Popular
Back to top


1





