- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Retired Tx sheriff claims state police investigators consider Floyd murder a staged event
Posted on 6/7/20 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 6/7/20 at 3:20 pm
https://www.kiiitv.com/mobile/article/news/local/gop-county-chairs-asked-to-step-down-for-suggesting-floyd-killing-may-have-been-staged/503-4403a884-c4ac-46a6-ba4e-f7bb061939fb
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SKky0mLhl5xJ/
quote:
GOP County Chairs asked to step down for suggesting George Floyd killing may have been staged The post is an article suggesting the death of Floyd was a staged event by Democratic strategists to make President Donald Trump look bad.
LOCAL Author: KIII Staff Published:
10:33 PM CDT June 4, 2020 Updated: 10:33 PM CDT June 4, 2020
quote:
TEXAS, USA — A major backlash for Nueces County Republican Chairman and former County Sheriff Jim Kaelin. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is asking him to resign his position as County Republican Chair after reposting an outrageous theory on his Facebook page last week. The post is an article suggesting the death of George Floyd was a staged event by Democratic strategists to make President Donald Trump look bad. Kaelin said the article was sent to him by a state police investigator and that he decided to share it for consideration
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SKky0mLhl5xJ/
quote:
Here's the text of the facebook post: This article was sent to me by a state police investigator. I thought I would share it with you for your consideration.
Interesting perspective: Staged Event? These officers were involved with something, I’m not sure exactly what, but something is just not adding up. I think there is at the very least the “possibility”, that this was a filmed public execution of a black man by a white cop, with the purpose of creating racial tensions and driving a wedge in the growing group of anti deep state sentiment from comon people, that have already been psychologically traumatized by Covid 19 fears.
Historically, in election years and in politically contested areas or in groups, racial or gun violence incidents are becoming common place. Considering the rising approval rating of President Trump in the black community, an event like this was unfortunately “Predictable” Consider these points and contrast them to every other police brutality incident you've ever seen. The filmed portion of the incident was about 10 minutes long. In that amount of time, three officers are holding one handcuffed man down. You only know that because of the pictures taken from across the street. You can't see the other two officers in the video because they are behind the vehicle. During 8 minutes of the entire video, the officer has his knee on George Floyd's neck, which is not taught or approved by any law enforcement agency. Additionally, other than the Asian officer speaking occasionally to the crowd of bystanders, there is no communication from any of the officers to Mr. Floyd. No talking, no shouting. When have you ever seen a police brutality video without police shouting? Additionally, the police had no goal. They weren't trying to subdue him for arrest, he was already handcuffed and all they needed to do, was place him in the back of the car. There is no plausible explanation for taking him to the ground and having three men on top of a handcuffed man, a knee placed on his neck. Mr. Floyd presented no threat and was not resisting. The only goal that there appeared to be was exactly what happened: “To be filmed brutally killing a black man”.
Think about this, these officers did not care about being filmed, in fact the officer stared into the camera with soulless eyes and an emotionless face, reminiscent of an assassin, as he knowingly killed an American Citizen. None of the officers spoke among themselves or did they speak to Mr. Floyd. They did not respond to his pleas for life. They just sat and kneeled on him until he was passed out and then waited an additional 4 minutes after Mr. Floyd lost consciousness to ensure that Mr. Floyd was dead and could not be revived. The bystanders are verbally communicating to the officers, that he isn't breathing. Unlike any other similar incident, you never see the officers getting on police radios. You never see or hear them calling dispatch for backup. No other police units arrive on the scene and ?strangely enough, the crowd does not seem to grow either. The scene does not end until an ambulance arrives and they unceremoniously flop him on a gurney. At no point does anyone in a uniform ever check his vitals. “As if they aren't remotely curious about the situation they are in” BTW. who called the ambulance and for what reason? Because if the reason was that Mr. Floyd was having a medical issue, they wouldn't have still been crushing his neck. Shortly after the video went viral, a fake Facebook page supposedly belonging to the officer, at the center of the murder appears and pictures are uploaded that say "Stand your Ground" and "Trump 2020". A picture of the cop with a red ballcap that says "Make America White Again". A friends list populated with obvious sock accounts and people clearly not his friends. This is the same kind of fake Facebook stunt that happened with a group made to look like support for the men involved with the Ahmed Aubrey case. Is it mere coincidence that this happens the week after “race” becomes a major political issue after the Biden "You ain't Black" gaffe, started to threaten the black vote the Democrats so desperately count on?
Additionally, there is substantial video evidence to arrest at least one officer now. Why would the local authorities not charge him immediately, unless there was a political advantage not to! Is it mere coincidence that this happens right about the exact moment the COVID-19 fear campaign falls apart, and after it has psychologically traumatized the entire country and got everyone at each other's throats and suicide attempts are spiking? Is it mere coincidence that this happens after the Auhmed Aubrey case... Which somehow eluded the mainstream media completely until two whole months after he was killed? When has that ever happened? Timing issue? Is it mere coincidence that Supreme Race Baiter Obama was making videos a couple weeks ago connecting COVID with "Systemic Racism"?
FINALLY....???? this entire scene plays out with the cop car and license plate that says "POLICE". The plate was perfectly framed for maximum subliminal impact. This also means he was literally just 1 foot away from the back seat of the police car and these cops thought it was smarter to kill a black man on camera, than to pick him up and move him one foot into the back of the police car.
You can draw your own conclusions, but this appears to have all the earmarks of George Soros. Please open your eyes!!!!
Posted on 6/7/20 at 3:28 pm to ThinePreparedAni
If so, what would be the incentive for the cops?
Posted on 6/7/20 at 3:29 pm to ThinePreparedAni
im about as far from a conspiracy theorist as you can get....but he makes some good points
Posted on 6/7/20 at 3:46 pm to ThinePreparedAni
I have a friend who is going to run for city council. I'll send this to him as a cautionary tale.
Posted on 6/7/20 at 3:49 pm to bogart
quote:
If so, what would be the incentive for the cops?
Chauvin was training 2 of them (had only been on patrol for a few weeks)
Chauvin also likely knew Floyd (others have speculated that it may have been a hit)
Motivators for Chauvin may entail blackmail all the way to mind control (given his absent stare into the camera while being filmed in broad daylight)
This post was edited on 6/7/20 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 6/7/20 at 3:50 pm to ThinePreparedAni
quote:he wasn't murdered
Floyd murder
Posted on 6/7/20 at 3:51 pm to bogart
quote:
If so, what would be the incentive for the cops?
Money and a chance to be relocated for a great retirement. If you don't think that cop, who knew the videos were rollin, did this on purpose, then you are not paying attention.
And then there is the end of the video were 2 cops, not EMT's pick him up...and don't attempt CPR.
This was on purpose.
Posted on 6/7/20 at 3:59 pm to ThinePreparedAni
Well that's just fricking stupid.
But stupid people will believe anything if it supports their agenda.
But stupid people will believe anything if it supports their agenda.
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:00 pm to ThinePreparedAni
For entertainment value...
In
In
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:01 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
And then there is the end of the video were 2 cops, not EMT's pick him up...and don't attempt CPR.
This was on purpose.
This is when I dropped my jaw when I saw that angle. Something very very fishy about this
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:02 pm to Kafka
quote:
he wasn't murdered
I concede it may not be the best term for the way it went down superficially, but it fits within the context we are speculating in
Eye on the ball
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:03 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Well that's just fricking stupid.
But stupid people will believe anything if it supports their agenda.
You will have better luck convincing folks if you use logic and reasoning. Do you have any logic or reasoning to dispute the points made?
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:05 pm to ThinePreparedAni
I have seen the other videos with part 1 and part 3. With part 2 never to be seen?
I hadn't watched the entire video where they flop him on a gurney (the videos last weeks cut off)
Video
It is obvious they knew he was dying and didn't GAF. I just read for the first time that George started complaining of medical issues early on and it took the ambulance 9 minutes plus to get there. So why hold him down if he was in distress medically?
Why kill someone while you know people are video taping? People tried to stop and the cops threatened with mace.
None of it makes any sense whatsoever.
I hadn't watched the entire video where they flop him on a gurney (the videos last weeks cut off)
Video
It is obvious they knew he was dying and didn't GAF. I just read for the first time that George started complaining of medical issues early on and it took the ambulance 9 minutes plus to get there. So why hold him down if he was in distress medically?
Why kill someone while you know people are video taping? People tried to stop and the cops threatened with mace.
None of it makes any sense whatsoever.
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:07 pm to Choctaw
This will be popular: conspiracy theories are killing this country. I believe a case for a conspiracy theory can literally be made for anything. Just from the jump...."who stands around calmly during police brutality?" Well, obviously "police brutality" encompasses a lot of situations and they're not all like Rodney King situations.
And why would the other officers just sit around while this is happening? Because they're the new guys and were probably in shock and dared not try to come over the top of the veteran hothead Chauvin. I don't need to convince myself any further after that.
And why would the other officers just sit around while this is happening? Because they're the new guys and were probably in shock and dared not try to come over the top of the veteran hothead Chauvin. I don't need to convince myself any further after that.
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:16 pm to bogart
quote:
If so, what would be the incentive for the cops?
Yeah, this is Sandy Hook level of garbage conspiracy theory.
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:26 pm to OMLandshark
A TV news report said this week that the policeman was involved with a large money laundering crime and was in trouble privately and was subject to blackmail and big trouble.
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:40 pm to davyjones
I agree. Conspiracy theorists are a big problem due to the stupidity of most of the country. My take on co spirwcies and deep state and whatnot are as follows....
You probably feel that if some rule, restriction, or expectation, weren't in place, you'd be able to do your job better. You may be right, or you may be wrong, but you probably believe that comment. I sure as hell do.
It's the same with government, except their rule, or restriction, is the constitution. They'd be so much "better" at their job if this one little restriction weren't there. Thousands upon thousands of govt officials have this belief. They all want that one extra little bit of authority. It's always for a noble cause, and there's certainly no evil intent behind it. And it's always some sort of unique "emergency" that requires them to have this never before had authority. They think they can do their job "better" if the rules were less restrictive. They try to make us believe it'll be just this once, and this authority will not be used again. They want us afraid and believing they can "save" us if we submit to their requests for more power. When we refuse, they divide us, and try making us believe that not going along with them makes us savages, or racists, or that we want kids or old people to die.
And this is what is being confused with a "conspiracy" or "the deep state". There's no secret meeting of govt officials planning to usurp your rights in evil ways li,e witches at black masses. The usurpation happens one small chunk at a time, and always in a noble effort, in order to "fix" the issue, or emergency of the day, whatever that might be. And once that restriction on govt is lifted, it never gets put back into place, whether the "issue" was fixed or not. And we all know that usually it doesn't get fixed. Often times, if not most times, the solution is worse. And you can bet they'll never admit when they were wrong. Actually, they don't even care if they were right or wrong. The closest thing you'll get to an admission of guilt is the opposing party placing blame and accusations while they secretly await their chance to use this new power in a few years when they're in charge.
The ultimate litmus test for whether a power should be granted to govt, or whether a law is good or bad, is to consider whether you'd want your biggest political enemy, or the person you disagree with the most, to be in charge of enforcing it.
You probably feel that if some rule, restriction, or expectation, weren't in place, you'd be able to do your job better. You may be right, or you may be wrong, but you probably believe that comment. I sure as hell do.
It's the same with government, except their rule, or restriction, is the constitution. They'd be so much "better" at their job if this one little restriction weren't there. Thousands upon thousands of govt officials have this belief. They all want that one extra little bit of authority. It's always for a noble cause, and there's certainly no evil intent behind it. And it's always some sort of unique "emergency" that requires them to have this never before had authority. They think they can do their job "better" if the rules were less restrictive. They try to make us believe it'll be just this once, and this authority will not be used again. They want us afraid and believing they can "save" us if we submit to their requests for more power. When we refuse, they divide us, and try making us believe that not going along with them makes us savages, or racists, or that we want kids or old people to die.
And this is what is being confused with a "conspiracy" or "the deep state". There's no secret meeting of govt officials planning to usurp your rights in evil ways li,e witches at black masses. The usurpation happens one small chunk at a time, and always in a noble effort, in order to "fix" the issue, or emergency of the day, whatever that might be. And once that restriction on govt is lifted, it never gets put back into place, whether the "issue" was fixed or not. And we all know that usually it doesn't get fixed. Often times, if not most times, the solution is worse. And you can bet they'll never admit when they were wrong. Actually, they don't even care if they were right or wrong. The closest thing you'll get to an admission of guilt is the opposing party placing blame and accusations while they secretly await their chance to use this new power in a few years when they're in charge.
The ultimate litmus test for whether a power should be granted to govt, or whether a law is good or bad, is to consider whether you'd want your biggest political enemy, or the person you disagree with the most, to be in charge of enforcing it.
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:48 pm to bogart
quote:
so, what would be the incentive for the cops?
Hint: they are not cops
Posted on 6/7/20 at 4:51 pm to ThinePreparedAni
quote:Good.
A major backlash for Nueces County Republican Chairman and former County Sheriff Jim Kaelin. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is asking him to resign his position as County Republican Chair after reposting an outrageous theory on his Facebook page last week.
We don't need stupid people serving in leadership in either party.
Popular
Back to top


17











