- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Respect for Marriage Act passes House (258 to 169) - now heads to Biden's desk
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:03 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:03 pm to Mickey Goldmill
For all people who follow any religion and voted for a democrat ever in your life FU
0
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:06 pm to Norbert
quote:
I am looking at it from a more rational, pragmatic perspective, which is how a government overseeing people of a multitude of beliefs should probably view things.
You’re not bright. You don’t know how you’re looking at it. You think commonly held wisdom is truth. You’re a mile wide and an inch deep. Cheers.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:11 pm to Azkiger
quote:Pretty sure he is Christian. I don't think the Christian Church ever recognized plural marriages.
The definition of marriage by the Church is a universal and eternal definition.quote:
It use to be one man many women. Don't pretend it hasn't changed within your religion.
The predecessor religion? You are absolutely correct.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:13 pm to GumboPot
quote:The earliest evidence of formal marriage goes back 4300 years. No one knows whether the original of a "formal" marriage relationship is civil or religious.
How is marriage a government thing now? Oh that's right. Governments wanted to adopt the religious practice because the main purpose of marriage is to raise a family. The government and the people running it loved the idea of a larger tax base.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:14 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
is civil or religious.
It’s unclear if any such distinction existed 4300 years ago.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:15 pm to Liberator
quote:Sometimes I agree with him and sometimes I disagree with him, but Indefatiguable is one of the clearest thinkers active on this forum.
You are utterly hopeless. And I say this as a medical professional who has seen too many similar cases of delusion and denial of obvious reality.
This post was edited on 12/8/22 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:18 pm to Norbert
quote:And they will continue to blame every loss on "fraud" rather than "unpopular stances on major issues."quote:They (the SoCons) are determined to never adapt and to continue losing winnable elections by remaining immovable on social issues.
It’s a majority opinion in the United States that gays should be allowed to marry.
But they so would win if these elections were held in 1987.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:22 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Incorrect. Please stop lying to people.
Your opinion is noted. Please have the backbone to come here and admit you were wrong when what you won't happen does actually happen.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:25 pm to pbro62
quote:so angry
Dumb frick are you
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:26 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
When you have the votes.
yeah, ok. if it's one thing libs are known for is honoring the vote and will of the people.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:30 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The House vote was 258 to 169 with 39 Republicans joining the Democrats
quote:
The bill was supported by all members of the Senate Democratic caucus and 12 Republicans.
Why do we even fricking vote?
And how often does something get 100% republican support with 1/4 democrat crossing party lines?
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:30 pm to the808bass
quote:4300 years is just the earliest evidence that has been found to date. I would not be surprised if the institution is several thousand years older than that.
The earliest evidence of formal marriage goes back 4300 years. No one knows whether the original of a "formal" marriage relationship is civil or religious.quote:
It’s unclear if any such distinction existed 4300 years ago.
Initially, marriage almost certainly evolved in Neolithic communities (or earlier) to prevent conflicts over "ownership" of the women. Does it really matter much whether the relationship was sanctioned by the local chieftain or by the local shaman?
This post was edited on 12/8/22 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:33 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Indefatiguable is one of the clearest thinkers active on this forum.
Only thing I know about him is he makes shitty points about the Second Amendment.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:34 pm to mtntiger
quote:
Your opinion is noted. Please have the backbone to come here and admit you were wrong when what you won't happen does actually happen.
It's not my opinion. It's fact. This bill specifically protects churches and their tax exemption status.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:34 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
71% of Americans support same-sex marriage, including 55% of Republicans
quote:Stockholm Syndrome. Eat shite long enough and you'll be begging for kernels of corn in your next shite sandwich.
It's forced acquiesce to appease a minority.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:36 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
And they will continue to blame every loss on "fraud" rather than "unpopular stances on major issues."
I think the fraud is in the illegal votes. Like the Wisconsin Supreme Court said.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:40 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
protect same-sex and interracial marriage
Are there any states that still ban interracial marriages? If not then why put this in the bill?
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:42 pm to KLSU
The Loving histrionics are lefty fanfic post-Dobbs.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:42 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Didn’t lie and asked a question?
I mean you are one to call someone a liar.
Hell, you support a party that lives off of lies. Ever hear of the inflation reduction act? Yeah, what a doozy. How about all the green energy BS? Don’t ever call someone a liar again until I see threads of you calling out your party.
I mean you are one to call someone a liar.
Hell, you support a party that lives off of lies. Ever hear of the inflation reduction act? Yeah, what a doozy. How about all the green energy BS? Don’t ever call someone a liar again until I see threads of you calling out your party.
Posted on 12/8/22 at 1:43 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Let the figs suffer divorce like the rest of us. They think they’re winning…wait until they lose half their shite and the government shoves a dick up their arse…they might actually like that.
Page 7 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News