- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Respect for Marriage Act passes House (258 to 169) - now heads to Biden's desk
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:14 am to mtopdawg421
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:14 am to mtopdawg421
quote:
This act is offensive to me. I'm biracial and they want to say that interracial, straight couples are under the same umbrella as gays. bullshitee. Thats why it passed. They used interracial marriage as protection.
In all seriousness, there are MANY black Conservative people who are very offended at the notion of the two being analagous..
0
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:39 am to AggieHank86
quote:
the highlighted language seems unlikely
a plural marriage could constantly add new members and thereby avoid inheritance taxes indefinitely.
Yeah that loophole would need to be addressed. Depends on what winds of social change happen to be blowing at the time.
quote:
Government ain't letting that happen.
Unless they can gerrymander a way for it to benefit them. Which is always a possibility.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:43 am to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Is this constitutional?
Doesn't matter in 2023...
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:48 am to mtopdawg421
quote:As soon as someone disagrees with your view, we can expect that poster to be called a racist.
I will NEVER recognize two men or women together as a marriage.
Welcome to the PoliBoard, the Far Right mirror-image of BLM.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 10:58 am
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:55 am to mtopdawg421
quote:
This act is offensive to me. I'm biracial and they want to say that interracial, straight couples are under the same umbrella as gays. Bullshite. Thats why it passed. They used interracial marriage as protection.
That's fine, you can be offended. The only 'umbrella' these two share is they were both argued in court using similar reasoning (substantive due process/privacy rights). That is why they were both included in this bill. If the Supreme Court looks at overturning all previous cases that used that reasoning, both gay marriage and interracial marriage could be on the chopping block.
quote:
I will NEVER recognize two men or women together as a marriage. The state may recognize it, but don't force nor expect true churches to the Faith to honor it from that standpoint. Go get "hitched" in a courthouse or some "church" that promotes drag queens. The progs are trying to wrap the ole "Separation of Church and State" around their desires even though they generally use it as a weapon against conservatives.
Recognize or don't recognize whatever you want. You do you. This bill doesn't force anything upon you or any church for that matter.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:56 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
This bill doesn't force anything upon you or any church for that matter.
The language of the Bill will be ignored by Democrats, all the while using this Bill as a shield to oppress Christians.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
As soon as someone disagrees with your view, we can expect that poster to be called a racist.
Welcome to the PoliBoard.
That's not what you did, racist.
You are a liar trying to rewrite History.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 10:58 am
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:59 am to mtopdawg421
quote:
I will NEVER recognize two men or women together as a marriage. The state may recognize it
This is one of those cases where your opinion only matters to you
The state has decided the issue
quote:
but don't force nor expect true churches to the Faith to honor it from that standpoint.
100% agree
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:00 am to Powerman
quote:
The state has decided the issue
Ahhhhhhmmmmmm......ahhhhhhhmmmmmm.....All bow before the all-knowing, all-seeing, Holy State.......aahhhhhhmmmmmmm.....
You are a sheep....
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:00 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:Now you are a racist. Sorry, don the hood.
That's fine, you can be offended.
quote:Get out of here with that legal "word salad."
The only 'umbrella' these two share is they were both argued in court using similar reasoning (substantive due process/privacy rights). That is why they were both included in this bill. If the Supreme Court looks at overturning all previous cases that used that reasoning, both gay marriage and interracial marriage could be on the chopping block.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:02 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Now you are a racist. Sorry, don the hood.
Maybe if you weren't a dick who loves accusing those you disagree with of being bigots, people would cut you a break when you post White Liberal Karenesque racist diatribes.
Since you love to call people bigots, you don't get to complain when people point out your racist bullshite.
Clean your house....
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:03 am to Powerman
quote:The "state," in the form of the elected representatives of "We, the People" and their designated appointees.
The state has decided the issue
71% of Americans support SSM.
Welcome to life in a democracy (federal representative republic, for the pedantic).
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:04 am to AggieHank86
quote:
71% of Americans support SSM.
Link?
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:05 am to oogabooga68
quote:I linked it three times yesterday. Go find it yourself.
71% of Americans support SSM.quote:
Link?
Screw it. Here it is, you lazy ....
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 11:08 am
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:06 am to AggieHank86
quote:
71% of Americans support SSM.
Should be a local call.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:07 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I linked it three times yesterday. Go find it yourself.
Link ?
I don't keep up with you, so I'd appreciate you posting it....
And if it's MediaMatters or Stormfront, I'm rejecting it immediately...
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 11:09 am
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:08 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Welcome to the PoliBoard, the Far Right mirror-image of BLM.
what a fricking dolt you are. West Texas idiot here folks.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:09 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Welcome to the PoliBoard, the Far Right mirror-image of BLM.
So now you gonna lecture us about what it's like to be a Black Militant?!?
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:11 am to Mickey Goldmill
We should all be against having to get a government license to get married...
Seriously, government sponsored marriage is the tip of the nanny state.
I have no problem with gay unions or marriages or whatever. IDGAF who you want to be with, I just think the government shouldn't be involved.
Seriously, government sponsored marriage is the tip of the nanny state.
I have no problem with gay unions or marriages or whatever. IDGAF who you want to be with, I just think the government shouldn't be involved.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 11:13 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Gallup interviews a minimum of 1,000 U.S. adults aged 18 and older for each GPSS survey.
quote:
Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 70% cellphone respondents and 30% landline respondents,
Wow....a whopping One Thousand fking people over 50 States IF they decide to answer the phone...
Hahahahahaaaa.
Page 17 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News