- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Respect for Marriage Act passes House (258 to 169) - now heads to Biden's desk
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:40 am to Esquire
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:40 am to Esquire
quote:NB4:
Interracial marriage and gay marriage are two completely different situations.quote:
They both trigger the PT when they are shown in commercials
“We can tolerate if they show it occasionally, but they just show it too damned much!”
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:41 am to AggieHank86
quote:
But both were banned by small-minded, bigoted people, who were unwilling to let others live their lives as they chose.
Your hood slipped yesterday, you have no moral high ground to be calling others "bigot".
Get your own house in order.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:42 am to the808bass
quote:Not so much
I’m this sentence, “bigot” means “people who disagree with me.”
quote:
big·ot
/'big?t/
noun
a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:42 am to Esquire
quote:
They both trigger some posters on the PT when they are shown in commercials. Others aren't triggered at all.
Fixed.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:43 am to AggieHank86
quote:
a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.
Being opposed to homosexual marriage doesn’t apply to that definition. Now start posting more nonsense.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:44 am to oogabooga68
Hank: “I think that if you live among a group of people, you are more likely to understand those people than individuals who have never had that interaction.”
Ooga: “KKK Bigot!!!!!!”
Your lies are tiresome.
Ooga: “KKK Bigot!!!!!!”
Your lies are tiresome.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:45 am to AggieHank86
You have been getting worked more than usual lately. It’s about time for you to combust and get banned again.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:46 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Your lies are tiresome.
So SOS and T-Bird who BOTH told you that you are full of shite are liars now?
Mkay.....
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:48 am to the808bass
quote:
It’s about time for you to combust and get banned again.
He did that yesterday.
He literally told SOS (a gay man) and T-Bird (a black man) that they were wrong in being offended by his clumsy, stupid, white-Liberal woman explanation of how a someone like HIM understands THEIR experiences simply by living in a certain neighborhood.
It was legendary!
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:49 am to the808bass
quote:
You have been getting worked more than usual lately. It’s about time for you to combust and get banned again.

Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:49 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Hank: “I think that if you live among a group of people, you are more likely to understand those people than individuals who have never had that interaction.”
You forgot the other part:
SOS and T-Bird: "You are wrong and being offensive"
Hank: "Agree to disagree, get over it, here's a study that says."....
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:51 am to the808bass
quote:
It’s about time for you to combust and get banned again.
From the Aggie Forum or here?
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:53 am to oogabooga68
quote:Both disagreed with my assessment of the relative knowledge of two people outside the group in question. TBird also went on a rant about “identity politics.“
SOS and T-Bird who BOTH told you that you are full of shite
Neither engaged in your inanity of accusing me of bigotry.
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:55 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Neither engaged in your inanity of accusing me of bigotry.
Do you need a Valium?
It's funny, the guy who LOOOOOOOOVES calling people bigots is incapable of seeing his own bigotry.....weird....
Posted on 12/9/22 at 9:57 am to oogabooga68
quote:No, I said that I disagreed with their assessment. Adults can do that.
He literally told SOS and T-Bird that they were wrong
I find it entertaining that everyone accepted the assertions of SOS to the effect that he knows more about drag queens than anyone here (despite not being one) because he has actually known drag queens. EXACTLY the same thing.
I repeatedly try to be polite to you and to engage with you as if you were a normal human being, rather than a troll. I am done. Enjoy the next 15 consecutive post you will be making.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 9:58 am
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:00 am to AggieHank86
quote:
No, I said that I disagreed with their assessment.
A supposedly straight, white man....
Lecturing a gay man and a black man.
The ULTIMATE in Karenesque bigotry, period.....
From the guy who LOOOOOOOVES calling those he disagrees with "bigot".
From the guy who sourced a MediaMatters article to label many people as White Supremacists.
Clean your house, "homie"....
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:04 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I am done. Enjoy the next 15 consecutive post you will be making.
I accept your tapout.
There is no doubt that everyone reading this KNOWS that your bullshite and lies can't withstand the scrutiny I give them.
There is no doubt you are a coward who will not engage someone intellectually superior to you.
There is no doubt you have ignored the "3 top sources" question I've posed to you because you are an intellectual fraud.
I accept your surrender.....
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:05 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I repeatedly try to be polite to you and to engage with you as if you were a normal human being, rather than a troll.
Your faux-intellectualism, bigotry and condescending nature belie your words.
You are a walking, talking offense to the very words you claim to live by.
Perhaps you should teach the forum a lesson and leave....
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:12 am to Mickey Goldmill
This act is offensive to me. I'm biracial and they want to say that interracial, straight couples are under the same umbrella as gays. Bullshite. Thats why it passed. They used interracial marriage as protection.
I will NEVER recognize two men or women together as a marriage. The state may recognize it, but don't force nor expect true churches to the Faith to honor it from that standpoint. Go get "hitched" in a courthouse or some "church" that promotes drag queens. The progs are trying to wrap the ole "Separation of Church and State" around their desires even though they generally use it as a weapon against conservatives.
I will NEVER recognize two men or women together as a marriage. The state may recognize it, but don't force nor expect true churches to the Faith to honor it from that standpoint. Go get "hitched" in a courthouse or some "church" that promotes drag queens. The progs are trying to wrap the ole "Separation of Church and State" around their desires even though they generally use it as a weapon against conservatives.
This post was edited on 12/9/22 at 10:12 am
Posted on 12/9/22 at 10:13 am to mtopdawg421
quote:
This act is offensive to me. I'm biracial and they want to say that interracial, straight couples are under the same umbrella as gays. bullshitee. Thats why it passed. They used interracial marriage as protection.
Hank will be here soon to lecture you about not being authentic....
Popular
Back to top



0





