- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Report: Robert Mueller wants to indict Trump, Barr won't let him
Posted on 3/11/19 at 3:37 pm to Bunyan
Posted on 3/11/19 at 3:37 pm to Bunyan
quote:
Barr won't let him
That explains why Trump put Barr in that position. I wonder what he offered Barr in return? I wouldn't be a bit surprised to see a check floating around or a sizable cash deposit made into one of Barr's bank accounts. I hope Schiff investigates.
0
Posted on 3/11/19 at 3:41 pm to Bunyan
quote:
In the Cockburn column, the anonymous journalist claims to have “several sources”
That part made me bust out laughing... It is beyond comical at this point.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 3:46 pm to Bunyan
They can’t at least say for what? Just that he wants to imdict Trump?
Posted on 3/11/19 at 3:58 pm to Bunyan
Also listed in the report to be indicted:
1 maid
2 Chefs
1 driver
3 gardeners
2 grandchildren
and
1 family dog
1 maid
2 Chefs
1 driver
3 gardeners
2 grandchildren
and
1 family dog
Posted on 3/11/19 at 4:34 pm to SundayFunday
Anonymous Brit sources = Christopher Steele. I'm sure this reporting is 100% true story.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 4:36 pm to Bunyan
quote:
Report: Robert Mueller wants to indict Trump, Barr won't let him
Posted on 3/11/19 at 4:38 pm to Bunyan
UH-DORE-ABLE
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:18 pm to Bunyan
quote:
by Bunyan
quote:
What's the money line odds on indictment? I want to get me some of that
Pelosi just took that off the table
She probably got a preliminary look at the Mueller report and shite herself
^^^ Calls it on the Pelosi announcement that she didn’t want to impeach Trump?
Yeah sure thing Nancy, whatever you say
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:22 pm to Bunyan
Don't know why the Spectator is getting dissed as a news source. People regularly use Wapo and NY Times as sources and there's no propaganda rag loonier than those two.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:25 pm to Bunyan
If these "bombshells" were anything NEAR this we would've heard it all over TV News
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:33 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
No way a Brit gets the scoop before NYT or WAPO
I am not so sure about that. But I tend to agree this is bullshite.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:35 pm to brian_wilson
If true this would be the biggest story in U.S. political history, and I am to believe some goofy Brit rag is the only one with the scoop here? And doesn’t even state what the indictments might be over?
This one really isn’t even worth discussing
This one really isn’t even worth discussing
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:43 pm to Bunyan
quote:
According to Cockburn’s sources, Barr has approved, or at least not disapproved, several other bombshell recommendations in Mueller’s report — the indictments of three adult Trump children, as well as Trump’s son-in-law.
quote:I'm calling
“It is said to recommend indicting three of President Trump’s children – Don Jr., Ivanka and Eric – as well as his son-in-law, Jared Kushner,” Cockburn wrote, adding that Barr has “silently assented” to the indictments of Trump’s family members.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:44 pm to Bunyan
This BS story was fabricated because Brennan said 8 March.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:45 pm to cajunangelle
I would hit that like the fist of a vengeful god
This post was edited on 3/11/19 at 5:46 pm
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:45 pm to cajunangelle
It’s true, it was all in the British Dossier
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:46 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
This story is BS
No way a Brit gets the scoop before NYT or WAPO
Supposedly a Brit got the scoop about peeing on beds
and these fricking morons believed it
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:46 pm to jamboybarry
quote:
This one really isn’t even worth discussing
yet here we are discussing it.
I tend to think its BS, but its possible cockburn has a good source inside the DOJ.
and the thing is a brit might be a better place to leak than NYT/WaPo. The brit can easily avoid repercussions from congress and DOJ, and also be better situated to protect the source.
that said, still bs.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:51 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
Barring some unseen bombshell, there’s no way that they have enough to indict trump and his kids.
There is no way that you can know that to be the case.
Posted on 3/11/19 at 5:52 pm to VOR
quote:
There is no way that you can know that to be the case.
Wish harder bitch
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News