- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remember in 2012 when websites were banned by your ISP
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:19 pm to CptBengal
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:19 pm to CptBengal
I remember getting banned on Twitter for defending our potus.
I remember getting my account banned on fb for supporting trump.
I remember a ton of magas on YouTube getting a lot of their content restricted.
If NN didn't address the virtual brownshirts running twitter, fb and YouTube... then good riddance to Nn.
I remember getting my account banned on fb for supporting trump.
I remember a ton of magas on YouTube getting a lot of their content restricted.
If NN didn't address the virtual brownshirts running twitter, fb and YouTube... then good riddance to Nn.
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:22 pm to Plx1776
quote:
I remember getting banned on Twitter for defending our potus. I remember getting my account banned on fb for supporting trump. I remember a ton of magas on YouTube getting a lot of their content restricted. If NN didn't address the virtual brownshirts running twitter, fb and YouTube... then good riddance to Nn.
You clearly don't understand the difference b/w content and the gateway to content....
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:23 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
You clearly don't understand the difference b/w content and the gateway to content....
it's the same difference.
If I block your ability to hold a sign, or make sure you cant make a sign...the end result is the same.
listen, bitch. i realize you're stupid and love mother government, being as you live in England. Stay there.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:26 pm to CptBengal
quote:
it's the same difference. If I block your ability to hold a sign, or make sure you cant make a sign...the end result is the same
dear god, if you don't like using google, then you can go to bing. Not so much with switching ISPs
quote:
listen, bitch. i realize you're stupid and love mother government, being as you live in England. Stay there.
You are dumb as frick. I moved back from England early this year.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:27 pm to Plx1776
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/13/18 at 11:14 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:27 pm to StraightCashHomey21
You can think whatever you want to get you through the day. Just know my side won :)
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:27 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
ear god, if you don't like using google, then you can go to bing. Not so much with switching ISPs
wheeeee! You're actually saying that ISPs will refuse customers?
now you're arguing companies, publicly traded btw, will choose LESS money. In direct contravention to corporate mission statements and fiduciary duties.
seriously. stop. you're too stupid to have this argument.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:28 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
You are dumb as frick. I moved back from England early this year.
then go back. and stay there.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:29 pm to Parmen
quote:
You can think whatever you want to get you through the day
Bc you are stupid
quote:
Just know my side won :)
You are exactly the problem.
Completely uneducated on the issue, but bc NN was put into action under Obama you want it taken away.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:29 pm to CptBengal
quote:
wheeeee! You're actually saying that ISPs will refuse customers? now you're arguing companies, publicly traded btw, will choose LESS money. In direct contravention to corporate mission statements and fiduciary duties. seriously. stop. you're too stupid to have this argument.
if we have a free market but we don't
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:42 pm to culsutiger
I would support it if it applied to the biggest social media platforms in the world, also.
I'm banned from twitter for going against a verified a-hole that spammed our potus.
I mean.. ya get banned from twitter, there's not exactly a lot of equal alternatives to go to. I think gab may have 5m users now?
Equal Fb alternatives are nonexistent.
Youtube? There's no comparable platform out there that's on the same level as youtube as far quality and audience are concerned.
Give me true net neutrality.. that is applied to not only isps, but the monopolies in social media also.
I'm banned from twitter for going against a verified a-hole that spammed our potus.
I mean.. ya get banned from twitter, there's not exactly a lot of equal alternatives to go to. I think gab may have 5m users now?
Equal Fb alternatives are nonexistent.
Youtube? There's no comparable platform out there that's on the same level as youtube as far quality and audience are concerned.
Give me true net neutrality.. that is applied to not only isps, but the monopolies in social media also.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:48 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I’ve read the con argument to repealing it, but what’s the pro argument?
Government regulation of the free market is never the way to go.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:55 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Remember in 2012 when websites were banned by your ISP
yeah, nobody else does either.
banned? no. but i remember when p2p sharing sites were being throttled and sued. i also remember when comcast/att pushed google fiber out of the game by locking them into litigation over pole rights and used google fibers downtime to install their own fiber
i also remember when comcast implemented data caps in areas without competition but not in areas with competition
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:55 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Government regulation of the free market is never the way to go.
Natural monopolies aren't part of the free market, though.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:57 pm to CAD703X
Then you're not doing it right.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:03 pm to bmy
quote:So you think having over three hundred internet service providers in the U.S. is a "natural monopoly"??
Natural monopolies aren't part of the free market, though.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 6:11 pm to HubbaBubba
Limited.
People who take advantage of paid for bandwidth ruin it for everyone else with their "I'll sell you these hosted movies for a fee" clowns.
Yea let me set up my unlimited water supply fir "x" amount a month and create a car wash and let's see how long before I have to pay for taking advantage of my useage for me personal gain.
Poors ruin everything with their schemes on how to steal and take advantage of others.
People who take advantage of paid for bandwidth ruin it for everyone else with their "I'll sell you these hosted movies for a fee" clowns.
Yea let me set up my unlimited water supply fir "x" amount a month and create a car wash and let's see how long before I have to pay for taking advantage of my useage for me personal gain.
Poors ruin everything with their schemes on how to steal and take advantage of others.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 6:13 pm to CptBengal
I distinctly recall Verizon and Comcast paying a massive settlement in 2014 for selectively Throtteling Netfix.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 10:07 pm to LSURussian
quote:
So you think having over three hundred internet service providers in the U.S. is a "natural monopoly"??
There were 3,195 electric utilities in 1996.. and you want to talk about over three hundred ISPs
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 10:07 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 10:11 pm to kingbob
quote:
I distinctly recall Verizon and Comcast paying a massive settlement in 2014 for selectively Throtteling Netfix.
So the laws exist to handle this...before NN.
Thanks for proving the point
Popular
Back to top



2





