- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remember gold star mom Tina Peters is sitting in prison today because of corrupt Dems
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:22 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:22 pm to boosiebadazz
0
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
As far as if my response was an AI. No, I actually watched the trial and researched for myself who the designated election official was, their responsibility and the laws governing their responsibilities. Not only did she have a right to those machines and that data. She had a legal responsibility to it.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:28 pm to MikkUGA
I did however use AI for this
There have been several incidents that could be considered "scandals" related to Attorney General Phil Weiser in Colorado. These include a Medicaid fraud scheme, a case involving construction trust fund violations, and others involving fraudulent business filings and scams.
There have been several incidents that could be considered "scandals" related to Attorney General Phil Weiser in Colorado. These include a Medicaid fraud scheme, a case involving construction trust fund violations, and others involving fraudulent business filings and scams.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:33 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
Was she the dedicated election official? Yes. Did she have the right to access the data as the designated election official? Yes
Then why did she create a scheme to use a third party ID? Why did she turn the cameras off?
quote:
As the designated election official, is it her job to preserve the data for 25 months? Yes.
To preserve it properly, yes.
Is your argument this was proper preservation?
quote:
Now ask yourself why she didn't have access to data that it is her job to not only have access but to preserve it.
I never made that argument.
I'm arguing she created a fraudulent scheme to obfuscate her role, which it did, for a time.
quote:
As far as third parties every state and county that use voting machines have contracted third party's that do that work.
To be the unilateral person to possess the data in a clandestine manner where no other party is aware? Do tell.
quote:
Who has the authority to grant that third party access. The designated election official. Who was that ? Tina Peters.
There are procedures for the storage and preservation of public records.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:37 pm to loogaroo
There are federal laws that cover civil rights violations under the color of law. They can even imprison prosecutors and judges for violations of civil and constitutional rights.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
The question shouldn't be why did she create a scheme? It should be why did she have to? As the designated election official she should have had access, she should be able to appoint third party computer specialists to extract and store the data. So who was preventing her from performing a job that she was legally obligated to. Without going deep into the AG he already had 3 illegal fraudulent scandals show up attached to his name.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 6:54 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
The question shouldn't be why did she create a scheme?
That's YOUR question to justify her "preservation" of the data.
Preserving the data is your answer to the "why did she create a scheme?" question.
quote:
It should be why did she have to?
She didn't. That's the thing.
Now, would Mike Lindell have had access to that data if it was preserved properly? No. THAT was the problem to her.
quote:
As the designated election official she should have had access, she should be able to appoint third party computer specialists to extract and store the data
She could have, if she did so following proper protocols.
I imagine that data was stored properly following protocols, with the proper, authorized, channels.
Do you think it's legal for officials having responsibility to preserve data to create a fraudulent scheme to give the data to a 3rd party in a clandestine nature? In what world is that standard or legal preservation protocol?
Where was the chain of custody?
quote:
Without going deep into the AG he already had 3 illegal fraudulent scandals show up attached to his name.
Completely irrelevant to the discussion.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:02 pm to loogaroo
I like how they choose to honor their state laws and say the feds can’t mess it with them but also say they aren’t intimidated by the feds for not following federal laws on other things
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:03 pm to loogaroo
quote:Of course.
Weiser
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:06 pm to boosiebadazz
Look at boosiedumbass trying to be edgy. Embarrassing.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:14 pm to VOR
quote:
Tina shouldn’t have broken the law because of her foolish fealty to Donald Trump. That wasn’t a wise thing to do…
So all criminals should be killed?
Tell me your thoughts about George Floyd.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:19 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
We know it won’t be Ashli Babbitt trying to break in to free her
You love black guys murdering white women.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
Regardless of her accessing the data which she had the legal right to do. Appointing a third party computer group to perform the work, which she also had the legal right to do. So they were prosecuting her for something she had the legal responsibility to preserve. This was in May of 2021, 6 months after the election and recount. If she believed someone was trying to delete the data, SHE and only SHE had the legal responsibility to keep that from happening. There is something seriously wrong with this case and there are people going to extreme measures to hide it.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:20 pm to jimmy the leg
Its amazing how all the leftists gang member/rapist/murderer apologist somehow found their brownshirts for this thread 
its a who's who of progfilth retardation
its a who's who of progfilth retardation Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
Least we not forget how hard Colorado pushed to keep Trump off the ballot. The democrat party running Colorado is as corrupt as they come. They went really hard after Tina Peters because they have something to hide.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:38 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
Regardless of her accessing the data which she had the legal right to do. Appointing a third party computer group to perform the work, which she also had the legal right to do. So they were prosecuting her for something she had the legal responsibility to preserve. This was in May of 2021, 6 months after the election and recount. If she believed someone was trying to delete the data, SHE and only SHE had the legal responsibility to keep that from happening. There is something seriously wrong with this case and there are people going to extreme measures to hide it.
The way your framing it makes no sense. It's almost as if you want Tina to be innocent so you're adding facts and mischaracterizations of what happened....
Why wasn't the vendor setup with access? Why was another employees access used by Tina's third party(instead of Tina's access)?
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:41 pm to MikkUGA
quote:
There is something seriously wrong with this case and there are people going to extreme measures to hide it.
Dominion.
This post was edited on 5/26/25 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 5/26/25 at 7:43 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
It's almost as if you want Tina to be innocent so you're adding facts and mischaracterizations of what happened....
Well...yeah
quote:
Why wasn't the vendor setup with access? Why was another employees access used by Tina's third party(instead of Tina's access)?
They won't answer..I've pointed this out multiple times
Why turn off the cameras?
Why the ruse of using his ID? Clearly she could create authorization identification if she did for him. Why set him up?
Why the clandestine operation?
Why not store the data publicly according to proper protocols?
Hell, why not store the data on a hard drive herself?
Why give the data to Lindell's agent?
Posted on 5/26/25 at 8:02 pm to Deplorableinohio
quote:
Nine years? You sir are despicable.
How so? That’s pretty tame compared to what yall think people who’ve committed no crime should face.
Posted on 5/26/25 at 8:18 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
Its amazing how all the leftists gang member/rapist/murderer apologist somehow found their brownshirts for this thread its a who's who of progfilth retardation
They get nervous about protecting that election.
Yet, foreign gang members should be allowed to roam free.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News