Started By
Message

re: Really good video here with James Cameron describing the Titanic submarine catastrophe.

Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:02 pm to
Posted by PCHSDawg
Pine Belt
Member since Oct 2014
299 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:02 pm to
The hull collapsed so quick that the pressure spike turn it into a combustion chamber. Nothing to do with propulsion.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22169 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

The vessel imploded and from what I understand the sudden compression results in a diesel detonation whereby everything combustible is vaporized.


That could happen in a normal sub full of hydrocarbon vapor from grease, lubes (insert Navy joke here) etc, but the inside of this thing was pretty simple and clean. Air will heat up from adiabatic compression, but there probably wasn't any fuel for a detonation.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119466 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

When you say "They" you mean the jews, right?

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68877 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

probably wasn't any fuel for a detonation.



Human bodies could be fuel at that sudden temperature.
Posted by Badface
Member since May 2020
1536 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

"Now there is one wreck lying next to the other wreck for the same damn reason".


>>>>>> the sub hit an iceberg. everyone knows.

Due to overzealous captains.

So same damn reason.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22169 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Human bodies could be fuel at that sudden temperature.


Possibly, but you really need vapor for a compression detonation. I haven't burned a human body. Yet.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68699 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Human consciousness runs half a second behind actual events.
What? How would anyone hit a fastball, catch a football, block a punch?
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
50462 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

He does not mention anything about material toughness, which carbon fiber does not have much of,


F1 engineers are laughing at you.
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
35095 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:15 pm to
I honestly had no idea anyone had ever been to the Mariana Trench. That is absurd
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22169 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

F1 engineers are laughing at you.


No, they aren’t. You’re confusing toughness and strength. Toughness has a specific meaning when discussing material properties.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
50462 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:19 pm to
No, actually I'm not.

The tubs are made of CF as well. While the little parts like wings and bodywork, which are very thin, breaks easily the tubs most certainly do not.

CF is plenty tough.

I am not saying it was the proper material for the application.
Posted by Chief One Word
Eastern Washington State
Member since Mar 2018
3712 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:31 pm to
How hot would that air get?
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
15920 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:33 pm to
I believe the original descent to the Mariana Trench was in the 60’s, on the Trieste, which is insane for many reasons not the least of which it was built by Italians.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
15920 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

How hot would that air get?
About 350.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119466 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

CF is plenty tough.


CF has its application and most certainly for non structural parts or structural parts that do not lead to catastrophic failure if they do fail. I could be wrong but I don't believe we will ever see CF used in commercial plane fuselages. There is a massive incentive to do so because of weight and subsequent fuel savings but the cost of a failure is just too high so CF is not used in this application. Plus planes see very cold temps at 36,000 feet and structural CF members do not do well through temperature (and pressure) cycles.

My only point is CF has it's application under the appropriate circumstances. Making a sub to travel 2.5 miles below the sea is not a good application for CF IMO, and in James Cameron's opinion.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22169 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

CF is plenty tough.



"In materials science and metallurgy, toughness is the ability of a material to absorb energy and plastically deform without fracturing."

You see a lot of carbon fiber structures with plastic deformation? Bent bicycle frames, for instance? Or do you see cracked and broken cf bicycle frames?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119466 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

How hot would that air get?


With a hell of a lot of assumptions about 2,390 degrees F.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
22524 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:57 pm to
Anyone with any common sense knew immediately that the sub was a crumpled tin can on the ocean floor.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22169 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

My only point is CF has it's application under the appropriate circumstances. Making a sub to travel 2.5 miles below the sea is not a good application for CF IMO, and in James Cameron's opinion.


And if you were hell bent on using it, it should have been used as the entire pressure boundary instead of having titanium end caps. But that would have been expensive, and apparently the billionaire skimped as much as possible on this.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21878 posts
Posted on 6/23/23 at 2:29 pm to
This James Cameron guy sounds like he might know a thing or two about the ocean
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram