- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ‘Read this email immediately’: CDC calls 180 employees back to work 2 weeks after firing
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:20 pm to the808bass
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:20 pm to the808bass
quote:
How many?
Great question. I can’t keep up because it’s happening so frequently.
1
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:21 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I’m just here for the comments
K
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:21 pm to 4cubbies
Very surprising answer.
You sound like you have really worked through this issue.
You sound like you have really worked through this issue.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:21 pm to the808bass
“It wasn’t indiscriminately. They were probationary employees.”
If that was the criteria did their skills change so they are not probationary now..
You realize probationary federal employees is not always due to job performance but time on the job.. usually less than one year… can you think of any new federal employees that also fit that description?
If that was the criteria did their skills change so they are not probationary now..
You realize probationary federal employees is not always due to job performance but time on the job.. usually less than one year… can you think of any new federal employees that also fit that description?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:22 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Do you think the fact that so many have been asked back so quickly shows that the firings were carefully thought out? Seems to prove they were capricious.
Show me the 180 emails.
Oh you can’t?
Could be 300, could be 30.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:22 pm to the808bass
quote:
Sounds very official. “Not completely true.”
A bunch of people who took promotions or changed jobs/titles were given the axe and they were called "probationary". It was and is an ongoing clusterfrick.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:22 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Post the threads you started over Biden's vaccine mandate. The one Biden himself admitted was likely unconstitutional, the one that was ultimately ruled to be unconstitutional.
*crickets*
S'what I figured.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:22 pm to Thecoz
quote:
You realize probationary federal employees is not always due to job performance but time on the job.. usually less than one year
I do realize that.
If you’re running a company that is hemorrhaging cash, who gets fired first?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:23 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Do you think the fact that so many have been asked back so quickly shows that the firings were carefully thought out?
No, each individual firing was not carefully thought out. We'd be paralyzed if we did that. This is a hatchet, the carving tools come later. If you use the carving tools right now you'll never get anywhere.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:24 pm to Rebel
quote:
That is what the CDC did. they let 13 hundred go. they realized they needed 180 of the 1,300 back.
CDC followed thoughtless orders and was able to convince the First Buddy that they couldn’t actually afford to lose the number of employees he told them to fire.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:24 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
A bunch of people who took promotions or changed jobs/titles were given the axe and they were called "probationary"
You’re just regurgitating talking points now. If a person takes a promotion or transfer in the Federal government where their previous position is related, they do not have to go through a probationary period.
You knew that right?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:25 pm to 4cubbies
What government employees are okay to layoff in your eyes? Any? What DOGE cuts do you agree with? Explain.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:25 pm to Flats
quote:
No, each individual firing was not carefully thought out. We'd be paralyzed if we did that.
Are employees hired en masse like they are being fired? How can an agency have the manpower to carefully consider hiring someone but not enough manpower to carefully consider firing them?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:25 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
the duly elected President from doing the will of some people
oh, now we are "anti-democracy"?
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:26 pm to the808bass
quote:
You’re just regurgitating talking points now.
No sir. I know it for a fact. Of course, you will say I'm a liar and probably call me names, but that's okay.
And it is pretty clear you don't have a clue, but I am sure you believe you do.
This post was edited on 3/5/25 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:26 pm to Rebel
quote:
oh, now we are "anti-democracy"?
Not necessarily. Just honest.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:26 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Are employees hired en masse like they are being fired?
Kinda. I love how you shite questions out of your mouth thinking you know the answer when you don’t.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:27 pm to LegendInMyMind
I like that you didn’t quote the relevant portion of my post. You’re just spouting partisan bullshite and hoping someone will fall for it.
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:28 pm to the808bass
Well since you ask .. in oil business we are pretty good at laying off people..
Often we tend to not lay off the recent grad hires.. because they were good enough to get hired… and sad to say .. but they are the least expensive. Been through a few were we just flat said nope they are protected and it also would go over bad at the universities for future ..
Often we tend to not lay off the recent grad hires.. because they were good enough to get hired… and sad to say .. but they are the least expensive. Been through a few were we just flat said nope they are protected and it also would go over bad at the universities for future ..
Posted on 3/5/25 at 9:28 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Show me the 180 emails.
Oh you can’t?
We all know the First Buddy would be tweeting up a storm if this story wasn’t true.
Page 7 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News