Started By
Message

Questions For The Pro-Abort Crowd

Posted on 12/29/22 at 4:41 pm
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26617 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 4:41 pm
One of the huge conundrums regarding abortion is that only women are considered.

Why is that, when the unborn child is half the father's?

If he is legally responsible for the child after birth, why isn't he legally responsible for the unborn child?

If the woman can decide on her own to abort the child, why can't the man? Why can't he say he never wanted it, so keeping it is the mother's choice; therefore, the child is now 100% her responsibility?

Conversely, what if he wants the child and pledges to raise it if carried to term , but she decides to kill it? Why doesn't he have a say?
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29150 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 4:53 pm to
The woman carries the fetus and it’s part of her body. Not his.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78955 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 4:54 pm to
That’s (D)ifferent

Men don’t have a say in the woman’s utopia
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
9583 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 4:59 pm to
He’s responsible for his actions.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
10898 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

The woman carries the fetus and it’s part of her body. Not his.



Tell us you failed biology without saying you failed biology.

Posted by FtheNWO
Member since Nov 2021
223 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

The woman carries the fetus and it’s part of her body. Not his.


So when the hired hitman pulls the severed legs and arms and a head out of a recently killed child, those parts were actually part of the woman?

I wonder if you have the guts to witness such a procedure? It happens thousands of times every day.
Made possible by cowardly scum like you.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29150 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 5:58 pm to
What did I say that’s incorrect?
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

DavidTheGnome



Retard
Posted by tom1987
Member since Aug 2011
618 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 6:03 pm to
Half of the aborted babies are female. What about their right to choose
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 6:15 pm to
you raise good points but do not extend to the full and logical conclusion.
if men really were bound by law to pay support in the 100% sure way its required of women we could have such a measurement. in realty few unmarried are willing or volunteering to pay the freight. and for a fact a huge number of couples divorce and then the woman plays hell getting the help needed. guys who never made it. downturn in the industry. illness.
any of that happens the woman is shite out of luck. why in the actual frick does some congressman have a say in other people lives? why does your religion or values control her?
Posted by tigerlion
Member since Jul 2009
758 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 6:16 pm to
Put on a pink vagina hat and shut up, you he/him
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

What did I say that’s incorrect?
The fetus is enclosed within the woman's body, but is not technically a PART of the woman's body.

They think it is clever.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123826 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

DavidTheGnome
Ouch!
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 8:46 pm to
The "fetus daddy" question DOES raise interesting issues.

To me, the most-interesting is "What if the guy wants the baby and the woman does not?" It sounds reasonable, until you start thinking about the 13th Amendment and the whole "involuntary servitude" issue. I just don't see how forcing a woman to carry a baby to term for the man would not face MAJOR hurdles under the 13th.

Candidly, I think that the 13th Amendment would be handy in opposing state-level abortion restrictions, but I have no idea whether anyone has tried it.
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72595 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

but is not technically a PART of the woman's body.



Is it not CONNECTED by tissue (umbilicus) TO the woman's body? How is it NOT a part of her body?
This post was edited on 12/29/22 at 8:56 pm
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
26617 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

why in the actual frick does some congressman have a say in other people lives?


He or she is actually elected (hired) by citizens to do exactly that in hundreds of ways. We live in a representative republic.

quote:

why does your religion or values control her?


Why would your lack of religion or values do so?

Simply making abortion illegal isn't controlling anything. All it does is outlaw one choice - one of dozens, I might add, from having sex all the way to giving birth and keeping the baby or putting it up for adoption.

It really is disturbing to think that not being able to kill a baby in the womb is the equivalent of turning women into slaves in some people's minds.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Communist USA
Member since Nov 2007
12110 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

The woman carries the fetus and it’s part of her body. Not his.


It is most certianly NOT a part of her body. It is in her body, and a parasite to her body.. But it is NOT a part of her body... That is why murder of a pregnant woman can bring 2 murder charges, not just one.
This post was edited on 12/29/22 at 9:09 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

Is it not CONNECTED by tissue (umbilicus) TO the woman's body? How is it NOT a part of her body?
Parasitic mistletoe is attached to the oak tree and drawing sustenance from it, too. But it is not PART of the oak tree.

Again, I think it is a silly point, but they are TECNICALLY correct.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41648 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 9:54 pm to
When my wife was pregnant, she didn't have four arms, four legs, and two heads.

A baby is inside its mother. It's not its mother. They are two genetically distinct beings.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26112 posts
Posted on 12/29/22 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

Is it not CONNECTED by tissue (umbilicus) TO the woman's body? How is it NOT a part of her body?

What in the actual frick is this?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram