Started By
Message

re: Question for the Joggers of Political Talk

Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:12 am to
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173651 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:12 am to
quote:

Where is the hammer info coming from?

First I hear of this also.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:15 am to
quote:

Where is the hammer info coming from?
There's an object on the street that might be a hammer. The claim is the guy dropped it, but you can't see that happen on the video. All you see is something in the street.

My question to this jackass here is why did the guy drop his weapon in the street if his intent was to confront these guys? Every action he takes makes it clear that he is trying to avoid conflict, but these two armed assholes weren't going to let that happen. Their minds were made up, they were going to take him by force.
Posted by Desert King
Member since Oct 2018
1936 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:16 am to
Where did the hammer info come from? First I’ve heard of it. Would certainly discredit the “jogger” narrative. Still wouldn’t justify the actions of the father and son obviously.
Posted by Manzielathon
Death Valley
Member since Sep 2013
8951 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:17 am to
In what world is grabbing someone’s gun considered avoiding conflict?

There is literally tons of space for this guy to run, in any direction, he literally runs to the truck and to the guys with guns.
Posted by Manzielathon
Death Valley
Member since Sep 2013
8951 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:18 am to
I will link screenshots shortly.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
26316 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:19 am to
quote:

In what world is grabbing someone’s gun considered avoiding conflict? There is literally tons of space for this guy to run, in any direction, he literally runs to the truck and to the guys with guns.


If the jogger was armed, would he have been justified in shooting the two armed men who confronted him, iyo?
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173651 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:19 am to
quote:

In what world is grabbing someone’s gun considered avoiding conflict?


He was acting in self defense because they are the ones that provoked the situation by ambushing him with guns drawn

Are the odds against him? Absolutely. But they weren't going to let him just go about his day. That's pretty clear.
Posted by Desert King
Member since Oct 2018
1936 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:23 am to
quote:

But they weren't going to let him just go about his day. That's pretty clear


They wanted the guy to surrender. 9/11 had been called already before the shooting. I don’t think this guy gets shot if not for the fact he went for the gun. Obviously he had no way of knowing their intentions.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:25 am to
quote:

In what world is grabbing someone’s gun considered avoiding conflict?
Here in reality where the guy with the gun jumps in front of you after you already tried to avoid him once.
quote:

There is literally tons of space for this guy to run, in any direction
Like, forward? No, armed assholes had the road blockaded. How about backward? No, their buddy was tailing him with another vehicle and a camera, also possibly another gun. To the right or left? You mean onto someone's property? That's what you claim he did wrong to begin with. HE HAD NO frickING CHOICE.
quote:

he literally runs to the truck and to the guys with guns.
No, he literally ran around the truck to avoid the guy with a gun while still keeping his arse on a public road. They had one lane blocked with a truck, and the other with a gun. He took the safest route and still ended up with a gun in front of him.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:25 am to
the redneck shouldn’t have been out of the truck in the first place to set up a barricade
Posted by jts1207
Member since Apr 2018
928 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:30 am to
Have to believe the hammer would have been mentioned somewhere in the police report.....not buying it
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:33 am to
quote:

They wanted the guy to surrender.
What for? If I'm on foot and two dudes with guns and a truck try to nab me, no fricking way do I just surrender.
quote:

9/11 had been called already before the shooting.
911 is for reporting emergencies, and then hanging up. 911 is so we don't have to run around being vigilantes. We call 911 so they can dispatch the police.
quote:

I don’t think this guy gets shot if not for the fact he went for the gun.
I don't think this guy gets shot if he isn't confronted by an a-hole with a gun.
quote:

Obviously he had no way of knowing their intentions.
Their intentions were pretty clear. Road blockaded. Dude with gun standing in the street. Another truck chasing you. Armed dude reacts to your evasive maneuver. Clear all the way. He had no choice.
Posted by Desert King
Member since Oct 2018
1936 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:53 am to
I’m not defending these assholes. I’m trying to surmise their intentions, however ridiculously stupid they were. They were trying to do some citizens arrest on a guy they thought was doing something unlawful in the neighborhood. The father was talking to dispatch as he’s standing in the back of the truck.
If their intention was to murder the guy all along as some have suggested, I don’t think they would have been talking to police and filming it as they were doing it.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:56 am to
Well, everyone says "play stupid games, win stupid prizes". These guys were playing a stupid game, and hopefully they will win a stupid prize.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
26316 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 4:56 am to
quote:

If their intention was to murder the guy all along as some have suggested, I don’t think they would have been talking to police and filming it as they were doing it.


Don’t confront someone carrying a gun if you have no intent to use it
Posted by Apollyon
Member since Dec 2019
2124 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 5:00 am to
I need to know if a pack of skittles was involved
Posted by Desert King
Member since Oct 2018
1936 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 5:01 am to
quote:

These guys were playing a stupid game, and hopefully they will win a stupid prize.


The crazy part is that the filming of the incident is what will send them to prison. And they obviously thought it would exonerate them or else they wouldn’t have given it to the police.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36750 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 5:04 am to
In their minds they envisioned it going a touch more smoothly than it did, I'd imagine. In my mind I'd have assumed the worst case scenario and chosen a quite different set of actions. At most follow and keep eyes on the fella in order to best as possible direct police to his location.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138874 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 5:08 am to
quote:

How often do you go around patrolling your neighborhood looking for people you might want to shoot?
Nah.
We have patrol peeps for that . . . .

Posted by Desert King
Member since Oct 2018
1936 posts
Posted on 5/8/20 at 5:08 am to
quote:

I will link screenshots shortly.


Went back and looked at the video. There are actually 2 items laying in the right side of the road. The first one is too blurry to tell what it is. Could be a small tree branch or something. The second one is definitely a tool of some type. But it’s impossible to say from the video if the guy tossed it there as he ran past or if it was there before.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram