- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question for Dems re: Russia
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:12 pm to Bass Tiger
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:12 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
I've listened to several reports that stated Steele met with Russian intelligence weeks prior to dossier being drafted in order to get the unsubstantiated BS
It's been largely substantiated, btw. Maybe not the pee tape (PLEASE BE REAL), but tons of it.
1
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:13 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Wrong dummy, I've listened to several reports that stated Steele met with Russian intelligence weeks prior to dossier being drafted in order to get the unsubstantiated BS.
Yeah a former MI6 agent with maybe the most experience in Russia doesn't have contacts in Russian intelligence
Where else would he have gotten information from? Jesus... additionally what parts of the Dossier have been debunked? None that I can think of, but please feel free to hit me with some "report" from the daily caller, breitbart, or the federalist to convince me otherwise.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:14 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Nope. Doesn't apply. No monetary or other contributions of value were promised, offered or accepted.
So you wouldn't think that damaging information on Clinton given to Trump with the express purpose of winning the election constitutes a contribution of value?
Because, boy are you gonna be shocked when it hits you that you're wrong.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:15 pm to SquatchDawg
If it is shown that my dog is really an evil goblin sent to earth by satan to kill everyone, that will be enough for me to change my mind about my dog.
FYI - there's as much proof about the dog goblin thing as there is about the OP's "theory"
FYI - there's as much proof about the dog goblin thing as there is about the OP's "theory"
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:15 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
A meeting promising dirt
There was no dirt.
Okay, I'm satisfied. You've got nothing applicable to say. Thanks for the entertaining and enlightening exchange.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:17 pm to LSURussian
quote:
There was no dirt.
Again, does not matter. They took the meeting thinking there was, most likely with the intent to use it if they did get it. I've said it like 5 times but you choose to ignore that. Clearly lost in the ideology.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:18 pm to goofball
quote:
Isn’t the dossier actual proof of Clinton collusion with Russia?
It's proof that a private investigator (originally hired by Jeb Bush's campaign) colluded (i.e., interviewed) people who spent time in Russia and/or people with Russian contacts. It's not proof that Hilary Clinton or her campaign colluded with the Russian government to rig the election.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:18 pm to BamaAtl
quote:link?
It's been largely substantiated, btw.
It got all the names wrong of the people who hacked the dnc
It claimed michael cohen went to prague to pay the hackers. that was wrong
It claimed carter page went to russia to collude. That is wrong.
what has been "largely substantiated"?
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:19 pm to BamaAtl
The law you cited is clearly referring to accepting monetary or financial assistance to a campaign from a foreign government.
Keep being desperate. It suits you. There's a lot more sky for you to scream at....
Keep being desperate. It suits you. There's a lot more sky for you to scream at....
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:19 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Does Russia still fund the Federalist?
Source?
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:20 pm to LSURussian
quote:
There was no dirt.
I broke into the bank but there was no money there. So I'm totes innocent
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:20 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
It claimed michael cohen went to prague to pay the hackers. that was wrong
Cohen said it was wrong - you believe him? I have a bridge to sell you...
quote:
It claimed carter page went to russia to collude. That is wrong.
He's since admitted that he did go to Russia when the dossier says.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:20 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:
Do you listen to yourself?
Do you?
You and your boyfriend are conflating a private citizen who once held a position in the Russian government as "an agent working on behalf of Russia".
She was such a Russian agent working on behalf of Russia that she couldn't produce ONE PIECE of dirt on Hillary that the Russian government supposedly had?
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:20 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:You can keep repeating a silly thing but it's still silly.
I've said it like 5 times
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:21 pm to LSURussian
quote:
The law you cited is clearly referring to accepting monetary or financial assistance to a campaign from a foreign government.
Things of value aren't limited to money. Sucks for you and Trump, I know, but them's the rules.
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:21 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
illegally accepted help
You are such a dumbass
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:22 pm to SquatchDawg
“They entrapped me by putting the money in the bank for me to rob. It wasn’t my fault.”
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:22 pm to clooneyisgod
quote:Breaking and entering is illegal. Having a meeting isn't.
I broke into the bank
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:22 pm to LSURussian
52 U.S. Code § 30121 (a)(1)(A)
quote:
(a) Prohibition
It shall be unlawful for— (1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election; (B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or (C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.
This post was edited on 8/6/18 at 9:24 pm
Posted on 8/6/18 at 9:22 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Things of value aren't limited to money
Was the Steele dossier a thing of value?
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News