
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Q for MAGA folks that feel we had to go to war with Iran before they nuked Baton Rouge
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:43 pm to Duck Nation
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:43 pm to Duck Nation
1. Iran was receiving increased ballistic missile and drone development aid from China and Russia.
2. In part because of the aid from China and Russia the production rate and sophistication of Iran’s ballistic missiles and drones was increasing exponentially.
3. The rate of drone and missile production in Iran was quickly outpacing the production and deployment of interceptor systems by both the US and Israel.
4. Iran’s strategy for acquiring nuclear weapons was to appease the US on nuclear development while producing an arsenal that would have eventually made a military strike of Iran’s nuclear program too risky.
Conclusion: the window for stopping Iran’s nuclear development was quickly closing and Trump was simply following his promise to keep Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
2. In part because of the aid from China and Russia the production rate and sophistication of Iran’s ballistic missiles and drones was increasing exponentially.
3. The rate of drone and missile production in Iran was quickly outpacing the production and deployment of interceptor systems by both the US and Israel.
4. Iran’s strategy for acquiring nuclear weapons was to appease the US on nuclear development while producing an arsenal that would have eventually made a military strike of Iran’s nuclear program too risky.
Conclusion: the window for stopping Iran’s nuclear development was quickly closing and Trump was simply following his promise to keep Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:44 pm to Duck Nation
quote:
Duck Nation
Fair enough questions. So I'll ask: was Trump privy to Iran's nuclear capabilities before he was elected? And FTR, IDK how advanced they really were in nuclear arms.
Iran's Shia stuff is insanity and they should not be allowed to bring nuclear weapons to the playground. Someone has to stop them.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:44 pm to 1999
quote:
we were also told the nuclear program was obliterated in summer 2025.
And we're still at war with a country who's military has been wiped out, or so we were told.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:44 pm to Duck Nation
He doesn’t provide rebuttals. He just screeches real loud and makes 10 posts per day.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:44 pm to Duck Nation
quote:OK, but here was your question:
I know a lot of MAGA that support the war.
I know zero MAGA that supported war during the No New Wars Campaign.
I know zero MAGA that supported war the day before Trump started his war.
quote:
Why did you support Trump's campaign promise of No New Wars if you felt Iran was on the verge of having a nuke and that war was necessary?
You are talking to no one, because these people didn't exist. Now, maybe some have been convinced by the talking points after the war started and now support it (I'm not one of them, but it's understandable that people can change their minds).
But no MAGA supported his "no new war" policy but also wanted to go to war with Iran. So again, your question is to nobody. Maybe just ask supporters of the war why they later became convinced to do so?
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:45 pm to Duck Nation
I was not a fan of the Iran escalation.
Once the decision was made it left only 2 paths, regime change or a bad deal.
Although we are in the Schrodinger’s cat situation as far as the outcome, it looks like a lean toward bad deal.
But it certainly looks like Iran’s nuke plans got pushed back a few years. So, that’s something I guess.
Once the decision was made it left only 2 paths, regime change or a bad deal.
Although we are in the Schrodinger’s cat situation as far as the outcome, it looks like a lean toward bad deal.
But it certainly looks like Iran’s nuke plans got pushed back a few years. So, that’s something I guess.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:46 pm to Duck Nation
quote:
Why did you support Trump's campaign promise of No New Wars if you felt Iran was on the verge of having a nuke and that war was necessary?
Because it isn't a new war. The can was kicked down the road.
Go troll somewhere else.
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:47 pm to Breaux
quote:
by Breaux
quote:
to BoarEd
Your head:

Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:47 pm to Duck Nation
quote:
Duck Nation
I remember he said something about mass deportations.
That’s what I voted for.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:50 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
Baton Rouge was a shithole before Katrina
Yes, but doubling the population overnight didn't help.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:50 pm to NaturalBeam
quote:
You are talking to no one, because these people didn't exist. Now, maybe some have been convinced by the talking points after the war started and now support it (I'm not one of them, but it's understandable that people can change their minds).
But no MAGA supported his "no new war" policy but also wanted to go to war with Iran. So again, your question is to nobody. Maybe just ask supporters of the war why they later became convinced to do so?
I know plenty of MAGA that were adamant about No New Wars during the campaign but immediately flip flopped as soon as Trump started a war.
Was it really that complicated, or are you just being a douche?
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:51 pm to Duck Nation
They have the intel. You do not.
I actually admire a president that takes care of the problem instead of dumping a pallet of cash on the runway or just letting his wife run the White House like the last brain dead president
I actually admire a president that takes care of the problem instead of dumping a pallet of cash on the runway or just letting his wife run the White House like the last brain dead president
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:52 pm to Duck Nation
It is all based on logic and reason.
The actions of the Trump admin consistently fall within these parameters.
The actions of the Trump admin consistently fall within these parameters.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 4:55 pm to rrboy
quote:
They have the intel. You do not.
"There are weapons of mass destruction and chemical laboratories buried in the deserts of Iraq."
They had the Intel to.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:00 pm to Duck Nation
quote:
Thank you for your attention to this matter from A fellow Republican
lying sack of shite
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:01 pm to Duck Nation
I’ll take a shot. People thought that if the intel suggested that Iran was advancing toward a nuclear weapon, Trump would surgically stop that effort, NOT do the bidding of Greatest Ally and waste time and money and political capital on this schitt.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:04 pm to MSMHater
quote:
"They have Intel, you do not."
Weapons of Mass Destruction, gotta go to war!
Gulf of Tonkin 'incident", gotta go to war!
Iran gonna nuke us next week even though I said I destroyed their nuclear capability a few months ago, gotta go to war!
We need to hire those Iranian engineers if they can rebuild their nuclear capabilities from a pile of sand in just a few months
This post was edited on 9/21/26 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:13 pm to Duck Nation
quote:Sure, but you specifically asked why people supported his "no new war" policies but ALSO WANTED TO GO TO WAR WITH IRAN. Meaning - during the campaign - 2 years ago. There were no such people.
I know plenty of MAGA that were adamant about No New Wars during the campaign but immediately flip flopped as soon as Trump started a war.
That is different than someone supporting his policy during the campaign - and LATER flipping to support the war with Iran.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:15 pm to Duck Nation
quote:
Why did you support Trump's campaign promise of No New Wars if you felt Iran was on the verge of having a nuke and that war was necessary?
I don't think most wanted to go to war with Iran, nor supported it. However, since I guess you thought this would completely turn everyone against him en masse, I don't know what to tell you. He's still a great POTUS. Even if we don't like the Iran thing.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:25 pm to Duck Nation
quote:
A fellow Republican
That's not true because you exposed yourself by leaving key words out to disparage the King.
Your King, peasant.

Popular
Back to top



0










