- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Publix Goes Full Retard On Gun Control On 9/11
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:38 pm to nugget
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:38 pm to nugget
quote:
Says the guy that wants to force businesses hands by government action.
But the government already does that. If you can’t kick out some guy for wearing a dress there’s no additional regulation needed; gun owners are just asking to be protected like other special classes. Whether I agree with it or not it’s not unreasonable.
1
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:39 pm to Parmen
quote:
2nd Amendment.
In the purest form I agree. But until they(Fed Gov) institutes national open/conceal carry it isn't.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:41 pm to Flats
quote:
If you can’t kick out some guy for wearing a dress there’s no additional regulation needed; gun owners are just asking to be protected like other special classes. Whether I agree with it or not it’s not unreasonable.
Protected classes are ridiculous. However, the answer to government regulation issues isn't more government regulation. If as a business owner, I do not want to you to do something on my property, I shouldn't be forced to allow it.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:46 pm to nugget
quote:
I do not want to you to do something on my property, I shouldn't be forced to allow it.
Within reason of peoples "rights"
Now, is it a right to open carry within that state where the said business resides?
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:48 pm to MrLarson
quote:
otherwise he is finished.
Businesses are free to ask anything they choose from their customers, right?
Right?
You don't have to shop there.
(I may not)
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:50 pm to MrLarson
quote:
Within reason of peoples "rights" Now, is it a right to open carry within that state where the said business resides?
You're very inconsistent on this. I can limit someone's first amendment rights but not a state law?
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:51 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
conceal carry is just as effective
Well, that isn't true.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:51 pm to GoT1de
quote:
Businesses are free to ask anything they choose from their customers, right?
Apparently the government should force businesses to do only things MrLarson wants them to do.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 8:57 pm to nugget
quote:
I can limit someone's first amendment rights but not a state law?
Which First Amendment Right?
Yelling "frick white people" in your business? How many laws does that violate?
Go back to the playground.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:01 pm to MrLarson
I’ll just go to ingles
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:01 pm to nugget
It’s not more government regulation. The government already does this.
If gays were exempted from property taxes and I petitioned to have them pay property taxes just like straight people, am I asking for more government? Or am I just asking for equal treatment?
If gays were exempted from property taxes and I petitioned to have them pay property taxes just like straight people, am I asking for more government? Or am I just asking for equal treatment?
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:03 pm to MrLarson
Crying and name calling isn't going to help your understanding of government.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:03 pm to Azkiger
They are allowed to ask me not to.
But I’m also allowed to go to Harris teeter too.
But I’m also allowed to go to Harris teeter too.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:06 pm to Flats
quote:
If gays were exempted from property taxes and I petitioned to have them pay property taxes just like straight people, am I asking for more government? Or am I just asking for equal treatment?
You're missing the distinction between a government entity doing something and a private business doing something. The government shouldn't tell me who I bake a cake for or who I let in my store. Because the government figuratively points a gun at me and says I have to let a man in a dress in my store doesn't mean they should do the same with a person carrying a pistol. They should stop telling me who I can and can't serve.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:13 pm to nugget
Publix doesn't want open carry in their store.
I respect their right to run their business as they see fit.
I don't have to agree with them, or shop in their store.
Their business.
I respect their right to run their business as they see fit.
I don't have to agree with them, or shop in their store.
Their business.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:13 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:So you are a Publix and someone just happens decide they are going to rob the store. He sees a gun on your hip. Boom, you are first target. I am 10 steps behind you but concealed. Who is more effective at protecting one's self? Whether you get involved with an active shooter at that point is up to you. I think it depends on whether your life or family are in danger. The person could have an accomplice standing behind all of us with hand on their weapon. Most folks that teach this stuff say stay out of it until absolutely forced to engage.
quote:
conceal carry is just as effective
Well, that isn't true.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:16 pm to GoT1de
quote:
Publix doesn't want open carry in their store. I respect their right to run their business as they see fit. I don't have to agree with them, or shop in their store. Their business.
This should be every conservative's answer.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:19 pm to BFIV
Wait what? 
one is ownership of something, the other ones have nothing to do with that
They are no infringing on your rights by making sure you can pass a certification test and keeping your gun up to date.
one is ownership of something, the other ones have nothing to do with that They are no infringing on your rights by making sure you can pass a certification test and keeping your gun up to date.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:21 pm to nugget
quote:
You're missing the distinction between a government entity doing something and a private business doing something.
No, I’m not. We’re talking about government forcing action in both examples.
quote:
They should stop telling me who I can and can't serve.
I completely agree. Until they do I don’t fault people for wanting the same bs “protections” they extend to others.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 9:21 pm to tduecen
quote:
They are no infringing on your rights by making sure you can pass a certification test and keeping your gun up to date.
I think you're misunderstanding what a right is.
Page 3 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News