- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Protester kicks tear gas back at cops who then shoot him in the balls with a riot weapon
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:38 pm to TX Tiger
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:38 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
Wrong. Again, I generally only post here when I see something so ridiculously ignorant that I can't help but shoving the stupidity back in their face.
So a policeman firing a teargas canister at a protestor that kicked one back is one of those ridiculously ignorant times? And where is your proof of how ridiculous it is of us to think it was justified?
1
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:42 pm to Revelator
quote:The Constitution?
Wrong. Again, I generally only post here when I see something so ridiculously ignorant that I can't help but shoving the stupidity back in their face.
quote:
So a policeman firing a teargas canister at a protestor that kicked one back is one of those ridiculously ignorant times?
And where is your proof of how ridiculous it is of us to think it was justified?
A country supposedly founded on freedom and liberty?
The 1960s protests where police eventually shot real bullets and the response was the same as in this thread?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:43 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
I am as open-minded as anyone I know.
You're one of the most closed-minded people on this entire website.
You think you have it all figured out, and immediately dismiss anything, and I mean ANYTHING that goes against what you perceive is the "truth."
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:45 pm to stout
One can really never watch that too many times
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:45 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
The Constitution?
Please tell me which Article and Section in the US Constitution specifically deals with the video situation.
And then after you do that, please tell me how the police officers should have handled things differently to remain within their Constitutional limits.
I'll be waiting.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:50 pm to TX Tiger
Your response
To
Aren't these very close to the same?
quote:
I generally only post here when I see something so ridiculously ignorant that I can't help but shoving the stupidity back in their face.
To
quote:
Well it is to you because you only accept what you want to see and discard the rest
Aren't these very close to the same?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:53 pm to asurob1
quote:
One can really never watch that too many times
It is awesome. Much like the eclipse, it can serve to bring both sides together, if only for a moment.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:53 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
The 1960s protests where police eventually shot real bullets and the response was the same as in this thread?
Now you speak of what you know absolutely nothing and of which the two protested subjects have absolutely nothing in common.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:53 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
The Constitution?
The constitution doesn't give anyone the right to an unpeaceful protest.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 2:59 pm to TX Tiger
I was your 100th downvote. You're welcome.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:06 pm to crimsonsaint
Shouldn't the real question be when are they gonna start arresting these people who show up at "protests" with weapons, gas masks, face maskes, etc etc BEFORE they get violent? Pretty obvious that a dude wearing a bandana over his face and swinging a ball bat around isn't interested in peaceful protest.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:35 pm to Revelator
quote:Correct. As I said, in the video I saw a bunch of pussies taking video with their cell phones, not an unpeaceful protest.
The Constitution?
The constitution doesn't give anyone the right to an unpeaceful protest.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:35 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:YESSS!
I was your 100th downvote. You're welcome.
What's the record?
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:37 pm to larry289
quote:Yeah, it kinda does. In the 60s it was tear gas, then rubber bullets, then real bullets. In each case, the reaction from the sheople was the same as in this thread.
The 1960s protests where police eventually shot real bullets and the response was the same as in this thread?
Now you speak of what you know absolutely nothing and of which the two protested subjects have absolutely nothing in common.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:39 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:Why arrest them when they can just choot em, amirite?
Shouldn't the real question be when are they gonna start arresting these people who show up at "protests" with weapons, gas masks, face maskes, etc etc BEFORE they get violent?
Page 10 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News