Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

President Trump is crushing President Reagan's record on deregulation

Posted on 10/24/17 at 4:27 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 4:27 pm
quote:

In a speech on October 11 promoting his tax-reform plan, Donald Trump spoke rosily of America’s economic revival, crediting himself for having cleared the way for growth. “Since January of this year, we have slashed job-killing red tape all across our economy,” the president said. “We have stopped or eliminated more regulations in the last eight months than any president has done during an entire term. It’s not even close.”

It seemed a characteristic bit of Trumpian magniloquence—he’s not only a boffo deregulator, he’s the best ever! Still, it was a remarkable claim. Trump has overseen more deregulation than George W. Bush or Ronald “government is the problem” Reagan?

But, measured by at least one significant standard, Trump’s claim is true. Patrick McLaughlin of the Mercatus Center, a free-market-oriented think tank at George Mason University, applies innovative research techniques to the study of regulation and the economy. He recently analyzed the output of regulatory restrictions promulgated in the last several presidencies, going back to Jimmy Carter. McLaughlin found that there have been periods in some presidencies when regulatory output slowed or declined—in several years of the Reagan presidency, for instance, and in 1996, when “reinventing government” was part of Bill Clinton’s election pitch. But over the full terms of each recent president, including Reagan, regulation increased, according to McLaughlin. So far the increase in regulatory restrictions under Trump has been near to zero.

“So in that sense, the president may be right,” the economist reports. “There may not be a net increase in regulations so far under him, and since there was a net increase in every four-year term for every preceding president, going back to the ’70s, then I think that could be a safe statement.”

It’s a reminder that in this distraction-a-minute presidency, it can be useful to distinguish between the person of the president, who has no discernible ideology, and his presidency, which, so far, has been strikingly conservative.


quote:

The immediate plan was to employ a powerful but rarely successful legislative tool called the Congressional Review Act. A product of the 1996 Gingrich revolution, the act empowers Congress to override any regulation within 60 days of its promulgation. Each review roughly resembles regular legislation; it can’t be filibustered, but it is subject to presidential veto, which is largely why the act has been successfully deployed only one time, early in the first term of George W. Bush.

President Trump has signed 14 such actions in 2017.


quote:

Trump critics on the right may not be ready to declare Trump the avatar of modern conservatism, but, despite expectations and beneath the rhetorical dust storms he perpetuates, his actual governance has been strikingly conservative. It’s only been nine months, and Trump may never be able to distinguish the Sharon Statement from Sharon Osbourne. But if the trend continues, Trump will doubtless find occasion to declare himself more Reaganesque than the Gipper.


LINK
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51925 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 4:34 pm to
But... but... TWITTERZZZ!!!111
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10244 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 4:36 pm to
Extremely conservative as I and other said he would be. It takes one to recognize one.
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35251 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

The government has added an average of 13,000 new restrictions annually for the past 20 years. Under Trump, the number of new regulations is near zero.
I just don't understand how we can add 260,000 regulations over the last 20 years. That's over 35 per day.

Shouldn't new laws and regulations decrease exponentially as a nation establishes itself, adapting to changes (like technology), but those would be pretty specific? Something like this:


This post was edited on 10/24/17 at 4:42 pm
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43439 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

Shouldn't new laws and regulations decrease exponentially as a nation's establishes itself, like this:



This assumes a minimal government that doesn't grow.

In our case, our government continues to grow, creating new regulations...that causes our government to grow. Resulting in more regulations. Rinse and repeat.

Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
73327 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

The Weekly Standard




Never gets old.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51925 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

I just don't understand how we can add 260,000 regulations over the last 20 years. That's over 35 per day.

Shouldn't new laws and regulations decrease exponentially as a nation establishes itself, adapting to changes (like technology), but those would be pretty specific?


Government is like any organism in that it constantly seeks to grow and replicate itself. Expansion of CAFE standards, Homeland Security, the Patriot Act, new FAA regulations covering drones, Net Neutrality, etc. are all examples of not just regulations but sets (sometimes voluminous) of regulations, and that doesn't even begin to include the annual changes in the federal tax or law codes.
This post was edited on 10/24/17 at 4:50 pm
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

I just don't understand how we can add 260,000 regulations over the last 20 years. That's over 35 per day.



yet. Youre a 2 time obama voter.

and a hillary voter.

get fricked.
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14896 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 5:10 pm to
Good. Imagine how much better things will be at the end of 8 years.
Posted by BigD13
French Settlement La
Member since Sep 2013
2513 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 5:17 pm to
This is exactly why, during the primaries, that I would laugh at the Marco Rubio fans!
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35251 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

yet. Youre a 2 time obama voter.

Voted for McCain (regretfully) and Romney.
quote:

and a hillary voter.
I didn't vote in 2016.
quote:

get fricked.
No.
This post was edited on 10/24/17 at 5:18 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119260 posts
Posted on 10/24/17 at 5:20 pm to
To be fair to Reagan, there were a lot less regulations to begin with during the '80s.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram