- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pratt voters (10s of 1000s) receiving rejection letters (their votes were not counted)
Posted on 6/12/26 at 5:10 pm to scrooster
Posted on 6/12/26 at 5:10 pm to scrooster
quote:
file a class action lawsuit against a municipality or state if they believe their votes were improperly invalidated due to signature verification issues. Such lawsuits can challenge the legality of the procedures used and seek to restore their voting rights.
quote:
voters who receive notices indicating that their votes were invalidated due to signature verification issues can file a class action lawsuit against a municipality or state. This legal action can be taken if they believe that the procedures used to verify signatures were improper or unlawful.
quote:
Filing a class action allows a large group of affected voters to collectively challenge the actions of the municipality or state. This can be more efficient and impactful than individual lawsuits, as it consolidates resources and amplifies the voices of those affected.
0
Posted on 6/12/26 at 5:10 pm to Boss13
quote:
Yeah it says on the piece of paper in the picture that it just needs a signature and it will be counted.
So these votes were counted?
Posted on 6/12/26 at 5:13 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
More proof of cheating in California by demoncrats.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 5:14 pm to the808bass
quote:
So these votes were counted?
If they signed it and sent it back, yes
Posted on 6/12/26 at 5:16 pm to Boss13
But do we still get to keep the outrage?
Posted on 6/12/26 at 6:43 pm to Auburn1968
Now they've set fire to Pratt's office HQ.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 6/12/26 at 6:46 pm to scrooster
Imagine being so low IQ you think Los Angeles needs to ‘rig’ an election against Spencer Pratt. He was never going to finish in the top two because the vast majority of the voter base there are pinko commie Libs.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:15 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Old news
Like aTm fans being homos.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:19 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
More evidence it was stolen, but yeah... 'old news'.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:19 pm to ronricks
quote:
Imagine being so low IQ you think Los Angeles needs to ‘rig’ an election against Spencer Pratt.
I mean, it seems they did at least for the first vote leading to the runoff.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:21 pm to Boss13
Why make voters sign and resend their ballots back when we have video evidence of bums being paid to vote for Dems?
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:26 pm to Boss13
quote:
If they signed it and sent it back, yes
When did they get these ballots to be cured?
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:29 pm to scrooster
While I’m not skeptical, I would like to see some kind of corroboration of the number stated. Tens of thousands with only a photo of one such instance….
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:33 pm to scrooster
Seems legit.
Said no one ever.
Said no one ever.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 9:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
When did they get these ballots to be cured?
Thats a great question, is there literally anything in this tweet that can be verified? How are they able to quantify all the votes sent back for Republicans? I understand the outrage, but if we make a scene about stupid shite it will become a cry wolf scenario.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:00 pm to ronricks
quote:
Imagine being so low IQ you think Los Angeles needs to ‘rig’ an election against Spencer Pratt. He was never going to finish in the top two because the vast majority of the voter base there are pinko commie Libs.
“It’s ok that everything about voting and counting is shite because he would not have won anyway”
This post was edited on 6/12/26 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:46 pm to scrooster
The signatures appeared so authentic that it triggered a rejection of their ballots.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 11:28 pm to Boss13
So you don’t know anything more than the original tweet. Thanks for the clarification.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 11:56 pm to the808bass
quote:We know that Pratt lost 2nd place by 30k votes. So if the claim is to be trusted 100%, then there is zero chance the runoff is affected. But we can all wait until the end of June to see if the needle moves at all in Pratt's favor. I wouldn't bet on it.
So you don’t know anything more than the original tweet. Thanks for the clarification.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:15 am to scrooster
They tell you who they are, and dare anybody to call them out
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News