- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Postal Service won’t deliver mail ballots for states that don’t hand over voter lists
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:19 am
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:19 am
Slimy leftwing legal teams throughout the country already working feverishly to overturn this.
LINK
quote:
State election officials could soon face a stark choice: Hand over voter lists to the Trump administration or risk losing Postal Service delivery for mail-in ballots.
That dilemma stems from newly proposed USPS rules that seek to comply with an executive order President Donald Trump signed this spring to crack down on mail-in voting. If courts let the order stand, it would give the federal government an unprecedented role in elections — and could put even more voter data in the hands of Trump officials searching for supposed election fraud.
The Trump administration cleared an initial legal hurdle last month, when a federal judge in Washington, DC, who is overseeing one set of the cases, declined to block Trump’s executive order, allowing the Postal Service to begin implementing it.
LINK
11
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:21 am to uggabugga
This is the way
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:22 am to uggabugga
Why didn’t they do this for Massey
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:23 am to uggabugga
They'll simply have the ballots delivered to a Dem operative's trunk where they can be discovered a week after the election.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:27 am to uggabugga
quote:
could put even more voter data in the hands of Trump officials searching for supposed election fraud.
In their ardor to discredit Trump, this writer has distorted the English language beyond meaning. We aren't looking for "supposed election fraud". That's like saying the national hurricane center is looking for "supposed hurricanes". Trump is looking for election fraud, period. How much election fraud there is, and where it is, and how it happens, won't be known until we actually look.
This post was edited on 6/10/26 at 9:29 am
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:29 am to uggabugga
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:29 am to uggabugga
Post office is full of low info dim voters.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:29 am to uggabugga
This seems illegal
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:31 am to TBoy
quote:
This seems illegal
except, it's not.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:33 am to TBoy
quote:
This seems illegal
Why?
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:35 am to wdhalgren
quote:Indeed. Typical dishonest CNN framing.
In their ardor to discredit Trump, this writer has distorted the English language beyond meaning. We aren't looking for "supposed election fraud". That's like saying the national hurricane center is looking for "supposed hurricanes". Trump is looking for election fraud, period. How much election fraud there is, and where it is, and how it happens, won't be known until we actually look.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:36 am to udtiger
quote:
except, it's not.
Really? The postal service, an entity created to serve all Americans, can provide different service to different states based upon partisan political commands at the whim of the president without violating the equal protection clause?
That’s a hard argument. Let’s see how this shakes out in the courts.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:36 am to TBoy
quote:
This seems illegal
Preventing the use of the USPS in illegal activity like voter fraud?
It's no different than them seizing contraband that is being sent through the mail.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:37 am to TBoy
quote:It's exactly the same service.
The postal service, an entity created to serve all Americans, can provide different service to different states
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:40 am to TBoy
quote:
This seems illegal
That’s because you’re an idiot.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:43 am to TBoy
quote:
The postal service, an entity created to serve all Americans, can provide different service to different states based upon partisan political commands at the whim of the president without violating the equal protection clause?
They’re not providing different standards to different states. All states have the same requirements and regulations to have their mail-in ballots delivered by the USPS. The difference is blue states are refusing to adhere to the requirements and regulations.
You should be embarrassed this had to be explained to you.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:45 am to TBoy
Here is the argument from the states....
It would include names and addresses of people but ALSO SENSITIVE DATA LIKE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. Are you fking kidding me, its the federal govt, they already have your social security number. And you have judges supporting this nonsense.
It would include names and addresses of people but ALSO SENSITIVE DATA LIKE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. Are you fking kidding me, its the federal govt, they already have your social security number. And you have judges supporting this nonsense.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:47 am to udtiger
Any person with common sense would say giving up the voter rolls makes sense. Anyone who believes otherwise is admitting they are blatantly violating the civil rights of all US citizens.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:50 am to udtiger
I still go back to the Florida example. "Trump swayed the hispanic south florida vote".
No it was DeSantis cleaning up the shat in Florida that suddenly turned the state from turning blue to solidly red.
We fix this shat nationwide and cali, new york, Ill may not turn red, but they will be far less blue and Wisconson, Arizona, Pennsylvania go full red.
We would find the blue stolen votes have been embedded in metro areas for decades.
No it was DeSantis cleaning up the shat in Florida that suddenly turned the state from turning blue to solidly red.
We fix this shat nationwide and cali, new york, Ill may not turn red, but they will be far less blue and Wisconson, Arizona, Pennsylvania go full red.
We would find the blue stolen votes have been embedded in metro areas for decades.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 9:52 am to TBoy
quote:
This seems illegal
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News