- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Poli Board Defamation Scholars
Posted on 4/24/26 at 11:48 am to Ham Malone
Posted on 4/24/26 at 11:48 am to Ham Malone
Naming the sources should clear it all up.
Just pointing out the article was mostly presumption Trump will fire him, or intends to fire him because he is a drunk.
Just pointing out the article was mostly presumption Trump will fire him, or intends to fire him because he is a drunk.
1
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:09 pm to Ham Malone
quote:
Did any of you review this thread where a lawyer that handles these cases explained why the case is impossible to win?
Just because there isn’t another lawyer in here with a similar level of expertise in this area arguing an opposing viewpoint doesn’t mean there isn’t one, perhaps even an equally legitimate-sounding one, citing its own interpretation of the fine points of law involved.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:11 pm to davyjones
You type a lot of words to say nothing, how’s the other guy wrong?
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:11 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
but if others are offering corroboration of the claims, discovery won’t be great for Kash.
“Corroboration” doesn’t mean anything if the people giving them info are lying.
Or if the writers fabricated the story, and made up “confidential corroborating sources”.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:12 pm to Ham Malone
quote:
You type a lot of words to say nothing,
First time reading a davyjones post, eh?
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:14 pm to Ham Malone
If you don’t understand how law and legal arguments work then perhaps you shouldn’t weigh in on the subject. My explanation should be perfectly clear to anyone who feels competent enough to do so.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:15 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
First time reading a davyjones post, eh?
I’d find it quite troubling if you didn’t understand the concept I was speaking of, counselor.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:18 pm to davyjones
That’s even more words saying even less with a haughtier attitude, are you going to explain how the other guy is wrong?
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:25 pm to AlterEd
quote:Well, he did admit to being an errand boy.
So, do you plan on explaining how I was wrong or were you just flinging shite around?
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:25 pm to cajunangelle
6 pages of attorney’s arguing about this crap?
L
O
L
L
O
L
Posted on 4/24/26 at 12:38 pm to AGGIES
quote:No.
Sounds like you’re confused on my post
What it should sound like is regarding a "good point," "You were confused 'on' the previous post."
The "good point" was an absurdity. Patel willingly filing this case in an unfavorable venue would seem to indicate he thinks the thing is demonstrably fabricated.
Regarding your venue contention, there were two choices: DC, and NYC.
Got it?
It is possible that if Patel has maintained his old residence in NV instead of the DC area, he could have attempted a filing there, albeit with all the logistical requirements it would entail. But I suspect he's no longer a NV resident.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:19 pm to Diamondawg
He hasn't actually said anything of substance in this thread.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:27 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Is this good or bad for CashApp Patel?
Good. It will prove actual malice when it is shown to be fake news. Surprised you didn’t know that already.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:29 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Problem for Kash is that the Atlantic does not have to prove anything.
Simply not true and you're better than that
Obviously evidence presented that says the story is false then moves the burden to the defense
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:29 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Patel willingly filing this case in an unfavorable venue would seem to indicate he thinks the thing is demonstrably fabricated.
In what way does it indicate that he thinks this is fabricated?
The Atlantic claims over a dozen sources. Is your issue with the sources?
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:30 pm to Ham Malone
quote:
That’s even more words saying even less with a haughtier attitude, are you going to explain how the other guy is wrong?
Your appeal to authority is a logical fallacy. The quote in the OP will be very helpful to satisfy the actual malice prong. I’d be happy to answer any other questions you have.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:30 pm to AGGIES
quote:
The Atlantic claims over a dozen sources. Is your issue with the sources?
Maybe. Can you name one?
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:35 pm to Ham Malone
quote:
You type a lot of words to say nothing, how’s the other guy wrong?
Although this is Google it is a correct presentation of the burden of proof of the plaintiff
A False Statement of Fact: The statement must be demonstrably false and presented as fact, not opinion.
Publication: The statement was communicated (orally or in writing) to at least one third party, not just the plaintiff.
Identification: A reasonable reader/listener would understand the statement is "of and concerning" the plaintiff.
Damages: The statement caused actual harm to the plaintiff
The question then becomes whether Patel says none of this is true is that enough to ship the burden when they call him a drunker he might present another witness or know that then shift the burden approved for them to prove the actual facts of what they alleged
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:38 pm to AGGIES
quote:In what way?
In what way does it indicate that he thinks this is fabricated?
in the way that ...
HE FILED THE EFFING SUIT!
Worse yet, he had to file it in venue likely to favor the defendent.
quote:I'm claiming over two dozen. The evidence for my 24 sources is exactly as legit as that of the Atlantic. Show me names, witness details, and cross-check those with Patel's whereabouts on days in question. Until then I do not give a rat's arse as to WTF the Atlantic claims.
The Atlantic claims over a dozen sources.
Posted on 4/24/26 at 1:39 pm to BBONDS25
Tell me why Crimson77’s analysis is flawed, the last guy couldn’t so maybe you’re up to the task.
Page 6 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News