- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:09 pm to texashorn
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:09 pm to texashorn
quote:
Lawyering up and claiming immunity...OK.
Read this again real slow:
quote:
In this country it's up to the prosecution to prove guilt, not of the defendant to prove innocence.
1
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:10 pm to Centinel
quote:
Clear what? There is zero evidence of Trump doing anything.
quote:
“Did he also mention to me in the past the corruption that related to the DNC server? Absolutely, no question about that,” Mulvaney continued. “That’s why we held up the money.”
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:11 pm to Centinel
You just said this wasn’t a criminal proceeding, now you’re hiding behind rights granted in criminal proceedings.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:12 pm to 225bred
If your wife accuses you of having an affair and you’re not having an affair, do you call witnesses?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:12 pm to 225bred
quote:
Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Witnesses to what?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:13 pm to 225bred
No additional witness will change the facts. It only prolongs the Democrats obstruction.
Does not matter if POTUS even voiced a desire to close advisors, because the facts show the claimed desire was not executed.
Does not matter if POTUS even voiced a desire to close advisors, because the facts show the claimed desire was not executed.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:13 pm to texashorn
quote:
You just said this wasn’t a criminal proceeding, now you’re hiding behind rights granted in criminal proceedings.
Beautiful man just fricking beautiful.Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:14 pm to texashorn
quote:
You just said this wasn’t a criminal proceeding, now you’re hiding behind rights granted in criminal proceedings.
That's not rights granted in a criminal proceedings, that's basic logic.
You make a claim, it's up to you to prove that claim, not the other person to prove your claim isn't right.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:14 pm to 225bred
quote:Because it would appear to legitimize extra-Constitutional Articles submitted by the House
Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:14 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:
Because if witnesses come out, Trump will be exposed.
What will be exposed? Be specific.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:15 pm to 225bred
quote:
Please tell me why some Republicans on here are against witnesses being called?
Because these articles of impeachment are a sham.
quote:
we would want Hunter Biden called to the stand right?
Yes in an investigation into Burisma separate from the sham going on right now.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:15 pm to Jbird
They called how many of their own witnesses in the house? Was it something like 10-12? Not one single person admitted that a crime was committed.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:16 pm to texashorn
quote:
Because Trump is guilty of the charges as presented
What are the charges?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:16 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:Who was hurt by this in the end?
Remember Christine Blasey Ford?? That's why.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:16 pm to xiv
quote:Oh well then by all means go for it!
Who was hurt by this in the end?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:17 pm to LaTexSaint
quote:Not
Because if witnesses come out, Trump will be exposed.
a
chance.
Bob Barr already eviscerated the supposed Bolton claims. Witnesses will only help POTUS IMO.
This post was edited on 1/28/20 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:17 pm to xiv
quote:
Who was hurt by this in the end?
The reputation of the Senate?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:17 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:Continuing forward with witnesses or not will not change a single vote.
This isn’t moving the needle one way or the other
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:17 pm to texashorn
quote:
You just said this wasn’t a criminal proceeding, now you’re hiding behind rights granted in criminal proceedings.
Do you think that innocent until proven guilty is an arbitrary procedure or that it is rooted in some deeper concept?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 1:17 pm to xiv
The USSC nomination process.
This post was edited on 1/28/20 at 1:19 pm
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News