- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/6/24 at 3:55 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
I bet you had a good cry last night
Why would I?
I was on here until like 11.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 3:55 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
SFPs man crush
Posted on 11/6/24 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
Your memorandum is based on the indictment and prosecution of a sitting president
You know trump is not yet that, correct
Of course you do but you are in able of understanding the application of laws to facts
You know trump is not yet that, correct
Of course you do but you are in able of understanding the application of laws to facts
Posted on 11/6/24 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They are admitting to the world that their persecution of Trump was politically motivated.
quote:
Not at all. This is standing DOJ policy. The DOJ can't prosecute a sitting President, as the DOJ sees it as a Separation of Powers issue
Although I am glad he won the election, he is not inaugurated, so he is not the sitting president, is he?
His opposition using this policy as the reason to drop charges and cases is a poor excuse to save face.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 3:56 pm to dafif
quote:
Your memorandum is based on the indictment and prosecution of a sitting president
You know trump is not yet that, correct
As I said, they did him a solid.
2nd response ITT
quote:
Very good for Trump that he doesn't have to oversee that particular "Constitutional crisis"
Curious what NY/GA do now
quote:
but you are in able of understanding the application of laws to facts
Literally what I'm doing.
The memo is why they're dismissing the cases. I don't understand your malfunction.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 3:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not at all. This is standing DOJ policy. The DOJ can't prosecute a sitting President, as the DOJ sees it as a Separation of Powers issue
There are many policies the DOJ have violated. That is is the scapegoat, not ghe reason.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 3:58 pm to Azranod
quote:
I am glad he won the election, he is not inaugurated, so he is not the sitting president, is he?
They're doing him a favor.
quote:
His opposition using this policy as the reason to drop charges and cases is a poor excuse to save face.
It's following DOJ policy.
Trial is not possible prior to inauguration. The only way Trump isn't President is if he dies, which makes the cases moot.
In the extremely unlikely scenario he resigns prior to inauguration (not sure if he can even do that), they'd re-file the indictments.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 3:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which lies, specifically?
quote:
“The statute says the following, two or more persons conspire to injure and deny somebody the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured him by the constitution. What if a court ultimately rules that Donald Trump had a right under the First Amendment to make his Jan. 6 speech and to do what he did? Then Jack Smith will have conspired to deny him of that right. That’s how serious this is.”
“Jack Smith … deliberately, willfully and maliciously leaves out the words that President Trump spoke on Jan. 6 in his speech.... what he said was, ‘I want you to assemble peacefully and patriotically,’” Dershowitz added. “Jack Smith leaves that out. That is a lie, a lie, an omission lie and if you’re going to indict somebody for telling lies, don’t tell lies in the indictment. If you’re going to indict somebody for denying people their constitutional rights, don’t deny them their constitutional rights by indicting them for free speech. That’s how hypocritical this is.”
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:00 pm to NC_Tigah
That is Mr. Fantastic levels of stretch 
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not at all. This is standing DOJ policy. The DOJ can't prosecute a sitting President, as the DOJ sees it as a Separation of Powers issue
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They're doing him a favor.
Should have never started the Lawfare in the first place.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:No.
They are admitting to the world that their persecution of Trump was politically motivated.
----
Not at all. This is standing DOJ policy.
Because if it was, they wouldn't be "doing him a solid." They'd simply be following their own directives.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:03 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Should have never started the Lawfare in the first place.
We'll never know if it qualifies, since this won't go to a jury.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Because if it was, they wouldn't be "doing him a solid." They'd simply be following their own directives.
They'd be following their directives to dismiss the suit, you mean? Which is what they did?
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:04 pm to GumboPot
quote:He might well not be POTUS except for that bullshite and the response it entailed.
Should have never started the Lawfare in the first place.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:04 pm to MrLSU
It’s like they were using law fare to stop him. But failed miserably.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They're doing him a favor.
If there is one thing I have always said about the doj/garland/smith is that they are always doing favors for those they are prosecuting
If I've seen it once I've seen it a million times
Smith's nickname is "favor man"
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We'll never know if it qualifies, since this won't go to a jury.
We need better people with better legal discernment in the DOJ.
Posted on 11/6/24 at 4:05 pm to MrLSU
He ain’t out of the woods yet. Your fired lol
Popular
Back to top


1





