- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
People want to see the affidavit presented to a judge
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:38 pm
Seeing the warrant doesn’t mean jack. I want to see the reason they used to go in.
6
Posted on 8/11/22 at 2:39 pm to da prophet
quote:
Seeing the warrant doesn’t mean jack. I want to see the reason they used to go in.
Dollars to donuts it never sees the light of day, or they do what they’re trying to blame Trump of doing: destroying documents.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:07 pm to da prophet
According to some a confidential informant tipped them off as to the documents and their location within the safe. My question is who besides Trump and most likely his children would have access to such safe? Without access, you can’t definitively swear to the contents of said safe. Furthermore, it continues to fall apart after its revealed that the safe in question was empty. So the obvious question to me is why did a judge sign off on a search warrant regarding the contents of the safe if the informant could not swear to having access to the safe?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:08 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:Also, if it was “narrow in scope” as Garland stated, why did they search the entire domicile for 9 hours?
So the obvious question to me is why did a judge sign off on a search warrant regarding the contents of the safe if the informant could not swear to having access to the safe?
Doesn’t seem very narrow.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:13 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Also, if it was “narrow in scope” as Garland stated, why did they search the entire domicile for 9 hours?
I mean be honest here. If you had free access to Melania’s panty closet, wouldn’t you want to search it thoroughly? Can’t risk national security by glossing over her underwear. Gotta check ever last one twice, hell maybe 3 times to be safe. Probably had the boys working in shifts to ensure no panty was left unsniffed, I mean missed. Grueling job I tell ya. Simply grueling
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:18 pm to da prophet
quote:
Seeing the warrant doesn’t mean jack. I want to see the reason they used to go in.
Sally Yates walks free, and faced almost zero scrutiny.
Good luck.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:18 pm to da prophet
Typically, those remain sealed unless and until a criminal case is brought. So, you might get your wish!
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:20 pm to da prophet
quote:You will sooner see a real unicorn.
Seeing the warrant doesn’t mean jack. I want to see the reason they used to go in.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:20 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
According to some a confidential informant tipped them off as to the documents and their location within the safe.
Would the informant have to state what was in the safe? If the FBI discusses with an informant that they think Trump has whatever documents. The informant says I have not seen them before at MAL but he has a safe I don't have access to so they could be in there.
So the FBI goes to a judge and says we think Trump has these documents and an informant has stated they are likely in a safe at MAL. Then the FBI uses that as cover to search the property and take whatever they think could help them to build a future case against Trump for whatever they can come up with.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:32 pm to Nurbis
I think trump has the right to see the warrant and all documents and I would file a motion in the same court the judge granted it
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:17 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
Boy oh boy if Trump somehow 4-D Chess them with him knowing of or planting thought of info into a suspicious person of damaging goods just to make this happen. That wound enough to make me laugh for the remaining time I have on God’s earth
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:22 pm to MalletandScythe
quote:Yikes. SMH.
Typically, those remain sealed unless and until a criminal case is brought. So, you might get your wish!
What criminal charge(s) are you fantasizing might be brought?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:24 pm to MalletandScythe
quote:
Typically, those remain sealed unless and until a criminal case is brought. So, you might get your wish!
If this a federal thing? Every single warrant I have ever seen has the affidavit attached.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 5:29 pm to da prophet
The affidavit is where the meat is.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News