Started By
Message

re: Pence Delivers the Kill Shot

Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:29 am to
Posted by bisceaux
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2009
636 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:29 am to
quote:

quote:

Contemporaneous notes are usually rather convincing evidence for a jury.
From a political adversary?
His VP
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35778 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:45 am to
quote:

It actually seems to have been sound advice.

Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
49935 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 6:55 am to
Because trump is an easily flattered simp. Does that change what I said about Mike Pence?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466895 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:06 am to
quote:

the funny part is seeing people on here that claim to hate the MSM and have railed against the biases of the MSM, are now rushing to the board to post MSM propaganda that support their narratives and gotchas

If Pence did take these notes, then it's not propaganda.

There is nothing intellectually inconsistent with saying Trump was a fricking idiot in January 2021 (the rational talking point), but not a criminal for that idiocy (the MSM talking point)

Pence recording a detailed history of the idiocy in real time is agnostic in terms of political projection.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466895 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:08 am to
quote:

Imagine cheerleading this.

If I have a boss (or client, for that matter) going literally insane with stupidity, I always take detailed notes to protect myself. This becomes even more important if that boss/client wants me to engage in improper behavior.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
31328 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:10 am to
Jesus SFP. Donald Trump did not try to usurp the election. That didn’t fricking happen. This is all political theater.

You don’t have to like him. You can think he’s an idiot too. But to sit here and white knight for this bullshite is really fricking pathetic.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466895 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:21 am to
quote:

Jesus SFP. Donald Trump did not try to usurp the election.

I never said that

He did try to engage in a legal process to contest the results of the election in certain states, though. This was in conjunction with a fake elector scheme that was poorly thought out and mismanaged. It was stupid and not legal in the procedural sense, but not criminal.

He was told this was stupid and wouldn't work and instead listened to grifters.

quote:

But to sit here and white knight for this bullshite is really fricking pathetic.

Wut?
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31768 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Donald Trump did not try to usurp the election. That didn’t fricking happen.


What do you call what he did?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466895 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:24 am to
quote:

What about his other own people with a different opinion?

You have to have the ability to understand the issues and the person giving the advice.

Trump has shown an inability to understand simple policy and procedural issues, and that he trusts complete idiots and blowhards.

Trump siding with the clear idiots on his team should be a major signal to those who support him.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466895 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:25 am to
quote:

What do you call what he did?

Tried a legal scheme to attack the results of the election, as he has the right to do. He lost in civil court, and that should be the end of it.

Trying to argue that making an unsuccessful legal challenge is now a crime is dangerous territory.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66835 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:26 am to
I feel like no one here can really explain what was supposed to happen after J6. So, he maybe had authority to challenge certain states -- then what? A six month cyber ninjas audit? That's not gonna work. And if HE or some Republican state legislature got to pick the electors, that absolutely looks like a coup. 99% of this board would say that if Hillary had tried it.
Posted by UFMatt
Proud again to be an American
Member since Oct 2010
12816 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:30 am to
quote:

quote:
Donald Trump did not try to usurp the election. That didn’t fricking happen.


What do you call what he did?


Questioned obvious irregularities and voter fraud in 6 states that cost him the election. Similar to what Swillary did in 2016 but he didn't destroy 33,000 emails that were subpoenaed, or pay for false information against a political rival, or take up to 17 million from foreign countries in a pay to play corruption money laundering scheme.

This is a diversion, Joe Biden is the most corrupt President in US history. All of these indictments are just to shift attention from that fact.
This post was edited on 8/3/23 at 7:32 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466895 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:42 am to
quote:

I feel like no one here can really explain what was supposed to happen after J6. So, he maybe had authority to challenge certain states -- then what? A six month cyber ninjas audit? That's not gonna work


This was explained to the Q fans in real time but they chose to believe charlatans instead
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31768 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Tried a legal scheme to attack the results of the election, as he has the right to do. He lost in civil court, and that should be the end of it.


His loss in court(s) wasn’t the end of it though.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
466895 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 7:57 am to
quote:

His loss in court(s) wasn’t the end of it though.


You're right he told people who were legally protesting to not be violent as well
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
31768 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 8:04 am to
I don’t see anything in the indictment about incitement to violence.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80195 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 8:08 am to
quote:

His loss in court(s) wasn’t the end of it though.


He's entitled to appeal to the court of public opinion.

It's called political free speech and is protected by the Constitution.

It's telling that you oppose free speech.
This post was edited on 8/3/23 at 8:11 am
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84884 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 8:10 am to
quote:

It's telling that you oppose free speech.

That's the simp for you.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109735 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 8:12 am to
quote:

His loss in court(s) wasn’t the end of it though.


How so?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80195 posts
Posted on 8/3/23 at 8:12 am to
quote:

That's the simp for you.



When it comes to Trump, Decatur and Celtic are full on NPC.

first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram