re: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA “Vaccines” Are GENE-ALTERING Technologies

Posted by DeathByTossDive225

Baton Rouge

Member since Sep 2019

8244 posts

Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:46 pm to rickyh

mRNA physically cannot penetrate a cell nucleus. Gene expression & gene alteration are not the same things.

Any immune activation alters gene “expression”. This has happened to you countless times throughout your life lol.

On the other hand, gene “alteration” would be an earth shattering claim & vaccinated people would be consistently and rapidly dying from dramatic mutations.

Furthermore, this is not a real medical journal — it’s associated with a small advocacy group & has a long history of bogus claims.

This is the dumbest, most gullible corner of the internet. Good entertainment for certain.

Posted by Tammany Tom

Mandeville

Member since Jun 2004

5845 posts

Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:47 pm to GumboPot

quote:
Since you posted a Q screen shot it reminds me of one of Q's last post, "Israel for last". Or something to that effect.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

Posted by OccamsStubble

Member since Aug 2019

10000 posts

Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:47 pm to Penrod

quote:
Yeah, to achieve depopulation goals they spread a virus that almost exclusively killed the elderly and very infirm. Did you even think about that?

Thanks for admitting that the shots were only a realistic solution for the elderly and infirm

Posted by LSUbest

Coastal Plain

Member since Aug 2007

16292 posts

Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:53 pm to NashvilleTider

Calling Tigerdoc and Crazy4Lsu.

Get in here loons.

2 ...

Posted by AlterEd

Cydonia, Mars

Member since Dec 2024

11353 posts

Posted on 3/6/26 at 9:00 pm to Penrod

quote:
Yeah, to achieve depopulation goals they spread a virus that almost exclusively killed the elderly and very infirm. Did you even think about that?

This thread is about an experimental vaccine that was forced on the population for a virus that, as you say, only was harmful to the elderly and very infirm. Did you even think about what you typed? This thread isn't about the virus. It's about the "vaccines." Moron.

Posted by Tammany Tom

Mandeville

Member since Jun 2004

5845 posts

Posted on 3/6/26 at 9:02 pm to Tigers0918

quote:
I wish crazy people would just stay away from hospitals/doctors/medicine altogether. If you don't trust science or doctors, why ever go to one?

People who say this have no clue about the medical complex in this country.

Who pays for the vast majority of medical research?
- Pharmaceutical companies

How do medical researchers continue to receive grants from pharmaceutical companies?
- By ensuring that their research favors the pharmaceutical companies that fund their research.

What is a Pharmaceutical Companies primary objective?
- Profit

How do pharmaceutical companies maximize profit?
- Create a problem / Solve problem
- Treat the problem, but never cure the problem

But…. You continue to trust the science!

2 ...

Posted by Bham4Tide

In a Van down by the River

Member since Feb 2011

24684 posts

Posted on 3/6/26 at 9:59 pm to AlterEd

We already knew this is some Frankenstein-type stuff.

Of course, it’s just the bug-like aliens changing our DNA to better suit their needs when colonization happens and we all become food for their bug queen.

Posted by the808bass

The Lou

Member since Oct 2012

128720 posts

Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:28 pm to Penrod

quote:
Yeah, to achieve depopulation goals they spread a virus that almost exclusively killed the elderly and very infirm.

Is mortality up or down post-Covid?

Is the birth rate up or down post-Covid?

Posted by the808bass

The Lou

Member since Oct 2012

128720 posts

Posted on 3/6/26 at 10:29 pm to Tammany Tom

quote:
Treat the problem, but never cure the problem

This is retarded.

Posted by Salviati

Member since Apr 2006

7703 posts

Posted on 3/7/26 at 1:41 am to Vacherie Saint

quote:
PEER
R
E
V
I
E
W
E
D

The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons (JP&S), published by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), is not indexed in major biomedical databases like MEDLINE or PubMed and has been criticized for promoting questionable scientific views.

While the AAPS claims to have a review process, the journal is not recognized as having a standard, rigorous peer-review process within the mainstream scientific community. It is generally not considered to be a reputable, mainstream peer-reviewed medical journal.

For reputable, peer-reviewed literature, you should consult indexed journals in databases such as PubMed or Scopus.

Posted by onmymedicalgrind

Nunya

Member since Dec 2012

12170 posts

Posted on 3/7/26 at 3:06 am to NashvilleTider

quote:
Peer-Reviewed Study

quote:
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons

Posted by onmymedicalgrind

Nunya

Member since Dec 2012

12170 posts

Posted on 3/7/26 at 3:08 am to nealnan8

quote:
Before getting two exited about this, do a little research on the source publication.

People around here don’t “do a little research” if it confirms their world view.

Posted by onmymedicalgrind

Nunya

Member since Dec 2012

12170 posts

Posted on 3/7/26 at 3:18 am to Tammany Tom

quote:
Who pays for the vast majority of medical research? - Pharmaceutical companies

People say this like it’s profound. You’re saying the companies who are trying to research a develop therapeutics….pay for their own research and development? MORE BREAKING NEWS AT 11.

You want taxpayers to pay for this?

quote:
How do pharmaceutical companies maximize profit? - Create a problem / Solve problem - Treat the problem, but never cure the problem

Ahhh the ol’ “never try to develop cures because they aren’t profitable” talking point. Blows my mind how dumb so many of you are.

Posted by AlterEd

Cydonia, Mars

Member since Dec 2024

11353 posts

Posted on 3/7/26 at 3:18 am to onmymedicalgrind

quote:
People around here don’t “do a little research” if it confirms their world view.

Spoken by someone who has a vested interest in making sure the public remains ignorant as to the truth of the vaccine poison.

Remember Jack, after WW2 the doctors hung right alongside the NAZIs for their medical experiments. "Following orders" isn't an excuse.

Posted by onmymedicalgrind

Nunya

Member since Dec 2012

12170 posts

Posted on 3/7/26 at 3:23 am to AlterEd

quote:
Spoken by someone who has a vested interest in making sure the public remains ignorant as to the truth of the vaccine poison.

What’s my vested interest in vaccines?

If you could snap your fingers and get rid of all of these vaccines immediately…my life wouldn’t change one iota

Posted by ole man

Baton Rouge

Member since Nov 2007

17926 posts

Posted on 3/7/26 at 4:26 am to NashvilleTider

one reason among others why this country is so fricked up,,,, look at all the down votes in this thread....... you frickers need to take your head out of you asses so you can see the light of day,,,,,,,,,it is all being exposed, I said it then and I'll say it now...ya'll believe in the tooth fairy too huh,

Posted by NC_Tigah

Make Orwell Fiction Again

Member since Sep 2003

138574 posts

Posted on 3/7/26 at 5:33 am to NashvilleTider

quote:
Peer-Reviewed Study Finds mRNA “Vaccines” Are GENE-ALTERING Technologies

Okay folks, facts are stubborn things. I liked Peter McCullough during Covid because the guy was actually questioning things that needed to be questioned. But some of his work since then has drifted over the edge.

So, for what it's worth when I saw a paper addressing mRNA Transcriptomics, etc., but authored by an MPH, a Naturopath, and McCullough, it raised red flags.

1) The OP is not a study. It opines on other studies.
2) The OP is NOT peer reviewed.
3) There are 3 source studies the paper addresses.
4) Conclusions of those studies were highly criticized

Here is the full paper from the OP: "Gene Expression Alterations Induced by
mRNA Vaccines" LINK

The studies the OP paper references:

1. Von Ranke NL, Zhang W, Anokhin P, et al. Synthetic messenger RNA vaccines and transcriptomic dysregulation: Evidence from new-onset adverse events and cancers post-vaccination. World J Exp Med 2025;15(4). LINK
Peer-review:
Scientific Quality: Grade C
Novelty: Grade D
Creativity or Innovation: Grade D
Scientific Significance: Grade D

2. Chazarin B, Subramanya Bhat A, et al. Longitudinal proteomic and autoantibody signatures after mRNA vaccination in healthy individuals. Vaccine 2026;70:127888. LINK
Peer-review: Probably exists, but I couldn't find it.

3. Catanzaro JA, Hulscher N, McCullough PA. Genomic integration and molecular dysregulation in aggressive stage IV bladder cancer following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Int J Innov Res Med Sci 2025;10(10):380–386. LINK

Peer-review: None.
Not genuinely peer reviewed.

The "Genomic integration and molecular dysregulation" paper was published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science. To say that the IJIRMS is a poorly regarded publication may be an understatement. The IJIRMS appears on a litany of "predatory journal watchlists" including Beall's. They typically charge publication fees. Manuscripts are accepted regardless of scientific merit. Any label "peer reviewed" on such journals is contrived.