- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Paul Manafort pleads guilty in Mueller probe
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:02 am to tigerinDC09
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:02 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.
Like.... taking classified information home with you and storing it on a private server?
This post was edited on 9/14/18 at 9:03 am
0
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:03 am to tigerinDC09
quote:Liar!
So the talking point of this being a total waste of money has just gone out of the window.
The talking point was it was a waste of money investigating collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. And there's still not a bit of evidence of that.
You're an idiot.
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:04 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
I've bolded for emphasis.
I get that but the interpretation of it has become fricking absurd and I believe that whether it's a Republican target today or a Democrat target tomorrow.
It can't fricking mean, "we'll just look for everygoddamnedthing we can on anyone connected to the target".
Sadly, no one seems to want to recognize that is a very dangerous way to interpret the language.
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:04 am to beerJeep
quote:
Means? Come on now. You’re a smart guy. I’m sure someone of your intellectual capabilities can explain what From in or about and between 2006 and 2017 means in a few short sentences.
It means that the conspiracy, to which Manafort is admitting to, started in 2006 and ended in 2017.
See, pretty easy to explain.
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:07 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
means that the conspiracy, to which Manafort is admitting to, started in 2006 and ended in 2017.
That’s pretty definitive for “about” that time frame.
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:08 am to tigerinDC09
I admire how well you keep your torch lit with the pitchfork in your other hand . Eventually you’ll catch Trumpenstein, I promise. And then it will be HER TURN !!!
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:09 am to LSURussian
quote:
The talking point was it was a waste of money investigating collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
quote:
any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals
associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump;
Mueller just proved links between the Russian government and an individual associated with Trump's campaign (Manafort).
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:10 am to Blizzard of Chizz
You serve 87 percent of your sentence in federal prison.
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:11 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Looks like he won't be cooperating. Just a straight plea.
Awwwwwww...dats too bad.
Did it ever occur to you that he has nothing to cooperate with?
Seriously, you just cannot be THIS F*CKING STUPID.
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:12 am to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
What exactly would a guy who was a part of Trump's campaign for 3 months have that he could bargain with?
Russians
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:12 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Looks like he won't be cooperating. Just a straight plea.
Cooperating in what way? Him and his accomplice are both implicated. How could Manafort further cooperate?
Oh wait....you thought he would make shite up about Trump to get a lesser sentencea....LOLOLOLOL
THERE IS NOTHING THERE WHENNIT COMES TO TRUMP, CLOWN!
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:14 am to tigerinDC09
So are Manaforts tax crimes or Clinton’s felony and treasonous email server containing classified information more detrimental to the United States of America?
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:16 am to Erin Go Bragh
quote:
He was never cooperating. That's why honest bob went down memory lane to snag him.
People who have committed crimes should be snagged.
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:18 am to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
People who have committed crimes should be snagged.
Fine, no argument here on that count.
I do find it a bit offputting that the criminal pursuit, in this case, had political implications
This post was edited on 9/14/18 at 9:21 am
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:18 am to beerJeep
quote:
So are Manaforts tax crimes or Clinton’s felony and treasonous email server containing classified information more detrimental to the United States of America?
Whataboutism.
Trump's own DoJ re-affirmed the conclusion there was no Clinton "felony and treasonous email server"
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:21 am to Erin Go Bragh
quote:
Fine, no argument here on that count.
I do find it a bit offputting that the clinical pursuit, in this case, had political implications.
True, but the nature of his crimes were connected to politics so it was kind of unavoidable.
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:22 am to tigerinDC09
quote:Link.
Trump's own DoJ re-affirmed the conclusion there was no Clinton "felony and treasonous email server"
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:25 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
he nature of his crimes were connected to politics so it was kind of unavoidable.
You and I both know if Manafort had never joined the Trump team he would be a free unindicted man today.
Posted on 9/14/18 at 9:25 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Trump's own DoJ re-affirmed the conclusion there was no Clinton "felony and treasonous email server"
So.... if I have classified clearance. And I take some classified information home with me. And I upload it to my own server. Nothing will happen to me?
I haven’t committed a felony? And I haven’t committed treason against my country?
Of course you know just as well as I do, that isn’t true. We’d be jailed in a heartbeat.
quote:
Whataboutism
So you don’t want the law to be upheld?
Page 3 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News