- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Patel: Person of Interest Released
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:09 pm to KosmoCramer
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:09 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
The FBI Director shouldn't be going to Twitter to say anything like that if they 100% don't have the "subject", not suspect. Idiot.
Why not. Are you under the impression that when someone is brought in for questioning they are automatically guilty? Idiot. He is being transparent. Something you would normally love. Except you have TDS. Idiot.
This post was edited on 9/10/25 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:10 pm to BBONDS25
To be honest they probably already know and are watching till they get all the evidence together
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:10 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Keep reading the thread, moron.
TDS. Kirk murder….Transparency…bad
Epstein files….no transparency….bad
I see a pattern.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:11 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Why not. Are you under the impression that when someone is brought in for questioning they are automatically guilty? Idiot. He is being transparent. Something you would normally love. Except you have TDS. Idiot.
Absolutely not. It was taken by literally everyone, that they had the "subject" in custody. He then elaborated and thanks the locals for swift action.
It was a victory lap. Just stop.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:11 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
TDS. Kirk murder….Transparency…bad
Epstein files….no transparency….bad
I see a pattern.
Have a good evening.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:12 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
quote:The FBI Director shouldn't be going to Twitter to say anything like that if they 100% don't have the "subject", not suspect. Idiot.
Why not. Are you under the impression that when someone is brought in for questioning they are automatically guilty? Idiot. He is being transparent. Something you would normally love. Except you have TDS. Idiot.
Because saying “we have the killer in custody” and then saying “oops it was just a janitor” makes you look like a fricking clown.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:13 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
First shot at JFK was through his neck while he was in a moving vehicle.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Kirk wasn't something valuable enough to kill
He was getting massive amounts young voters away from globalist ideas, I could hardly disagree more with you.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:17 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
And what are the chances that it wasn’t a pro?
Shot placement suggests it was not.
And how often are high profile figures killed with a long range rifle shot? JFK. Who else? This whole idea of a class of highly skilled professional assassins for hire to the highest bidder is pure Hollywood. Obviously the various intelligence services have access to military guys but an organized political assassination is much more likely to be poison or explosives.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:18 pm to tiger91
Maybe I should have asked .. what’s the chance that this wasn’t a hired hit that wasn’t a pro?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:19 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
Shot placement suggests it was not.
Yeah, the neck isn’t a big deal….
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:21 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Obviously the various intelligence services have access to military guys but an organized political assassination is much more likely to be poison or explosives.
How often do they even use long range rifles?
Like targets in war don't count. I mean real political assassinations.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
One obviously comes to mind. But I'm drawing a blank after that.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:23 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
quote:
Wasn’t a very clean/professional shot.
It was a ruthlessly effective shot.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How often do they even use long range rifles?
If you wanted this to go viral, doing it when you know there are cameras pointed at him is the way to go.
It also serves as a clear message to others to STFU or “you’re next.”
Truly fricked up.
This post was edited on 9/10/25 at 8:26 pm
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How often do they even use long range rifles? Like targets in war don't count. I mean real political assassinations.

Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:29 pm to OccamsStubble
quote:
Shot placement suggests it was not.
Where did you father tell you to aim when shooting a deer?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:37 pm to Deuces
quote:
With modern technology and Kash Patel being the head of the FBI, and a conservative Governor, they won’t rest until this guy is captured.
Remember the terrorist attack in New Orleans ? And remember John Kennedy pointing his finger and promising we’d have answers…..
Yeah, me too. Still no answers or transparency.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You are a POS.
Kirk wasn't something valuable enough to kill
Posted on 9/10/25 at 8:44 pm to FnTigers
How does someone pull out a pistol and shoot and kill somebody in front of that many people and then just walk away. WTF??!!
Back to top


2









