Started By
Message

re: Parameters of the China deal

Posted on 5/12/25 at 8:02 am to
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
37734 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 8:02 am to
quote:

This is happening too fast, imo, and I for one was hoping to see some measure of decoupling. Coupling with Marxist China is not in our long term interests.


I don’t disagree with your goal, but how exactly are we going to decouple from China just yet? we can’t just walk away. Not yet. Hopefully we continue to work towards that. But it’ll be tough with only four years and no certainty on who will be the the next POTUS
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20436 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 8:38 am to
Per chat gpt the US only collected $80B in tariffs from all nations in 2023 so we would be 3X or more from China in the next 12 months than we were from the entire world in 2023.

If what Bessent said was true that China just ignored our trade deals under Biden it’s unlikely anyone knows exactly what we should’ve collected because they just told us to F off.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
74184 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 8:50 am to
Everyone wonders what the chinee are up to with the 90 days but it is also 90 more days to work on other manufacturers around the globe.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
35462 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:25 am to
quote:

US Tsy Sec Bessent: Neither US Not China Want To Decouple

The overwhelming majority of voting Americans want exactly that. They voted for Trump to decouple us from Chini.

Bessent should apply a little clarity here, and admit that We the People most certainly want to detach from China as much as possible, but it's the US Government that doesn't really want it to happen.
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
4490 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:42 am to
quote:

what Bessent said was true that China just ignored our trade deals under Biden it’s unlikely anyone knows exactly what we should’ve collected because they just told us to F off.


If they admitted that, send em a fricking invoice, and have their tarrifs removed until balance is accounted for
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93470 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:46 am to
Big Scrub, LSURussian and slackster all said no deal would be done this weekend

Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
18790 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:49 am to
It’s already happening but will take a decade or more. The point of the tariff chaos was to reset the balance somewhat as we make that transition.
Near shoring is in full swing and the ChiComs know this and also need time for an off ramp.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20436 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 9:50 am to
quote:

If they admitted that, send em a fricking invoice, and have their tarrifs removed until balance is accounted for

Can’t do that with half the GOP senate delegation running around cashing checks from China and the chamber of commerce to cut Trumps knees out from under him under the laughable notion that what they want and had before was free trade.

Looking at you Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul.

Their version of free trade with China is the same as the notion of consensual relations in prison apparently with the US taxpayer being the 130 pound guy who dropped the soap.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
18750 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:39 am to
quote:

If they admitted that, send em a fricking invoice, and have their tarrifs removed until balance is accounted for


The duties were collected and they were the ones Trump put in place.

What they reneged on was the beef and agriculture goods they promised to buy.

The 90 day break does not include the original tariffs from Trumps first term, the 10% base nor the 20% fentanyl tariff.
Posted by SlickRick55
Member since May 2016
2715 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 10:41 am to
quote:

US had a 19.3% tariff on China while China had a 21.1% tariff on the US


Doesn't this sound close to even? I was thinking it was way more out of balance than this.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
26893 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 11:15 am to
quote:

US Tsy Sec Bessent: Neither US Not China Want To Decouple


That says no to decoupling but this article discusses a strategic decoupling:

CNBC: Bessent sees tariff agreement as progress in ‘strategic’ decoupling with Chinal
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 11:18 am to
quote:

RogerInTheCuckChair isn't gonna like this


Posted by Bonkers119
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
11665 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 11:52 am to
quote:

At a 30% tariff rate that would mean $158B in additional tax revenue for us over the next 12 months.


You do realize that $158B is paid by americans correct?
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
2886 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 11:59 am to
quote:

You do realize that $158B is paid by americans correct?


An absolutely false statement. While Americans may absorb some of that, they wouldn’t be on the hook for the full amount.

Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
9762 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:13 pm to
Bessent saying we don't want to decouple is common sense. We do not have the factories here to replace China. Quite frankly, neither does the world. That's only a possibility over a long period of time.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
74184 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:25 pm to
Not a long time. Factories all over the world and in most cases, not all, can be retooled fairly quickly.
Posted by hogcard1964
Alabama
Member since Jan 2017
17463 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 1:44 pm to
We ended up better off than China for the time being.

This is bad in the eyes of clown world.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
9762 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Not a long time. Factories all over the world and in most cases, not all, can be retooled fairly quickly.


How long do you think it would take to produce televisions over here? Everyone likes tv and I'm sure we all have them. So let's say that we stop importing them to spur domestic production. How long do you think it takes and what does the investment look like? How do you work out your supply chain so and so forth? Do you have supplier partners on-site manufacturing what you don't so that you can produce a finished product? It's a complex problem and it isn't solved quickly, easily or cheaply. The issues I just raised are in large part why Foxconn failed in WI.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20436 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

You do realize that $158B is paid by americans correct?

The vast majority of it will not be passed along to consumers or retailers will simply take orders from lower tariff rate nations.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
74184 posts
Posted on 5/12/25 at 2:20 pm to
6 months on basic items or a factory already building similar items. 6 -18 months on more complicated change overs. Under 3 years to build a new factory.
The logistics you mentioned are worked out long before the construction or change overs ever begin.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram