Started By
Message

re: Overturning Roe is a losing issue

Posted on 9/19/20 at 12:58 pm to
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
24829 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 12:58 pm to
IDGAF about RVW at this moment...

That is to say, it's something I feel deeply about, but the focus is filling the seat.

Any RVW shite the dims try to stick to this should be immediately dismissed as conjecture and distraction by both the GOPe and the nominee.
Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3640 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

all easily legislated and decided at the STATE LEVEL


I don’t think a state should be able to make a life saving medical treatment illegal. You do. That’s ok, we disagree on the extent of federal regulation in this case.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48320 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

It’s a winning issue for babies though.


Maybe.

There will be an explosion in black market abortions.
Posted by mark65mc
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
11281 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:15 pm to
Libs love “muh science” except when it comes to topics like when life begins, the number of genders, “Man made” climate change (arson), and Nanshy’s resting blood alcohol content.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48320 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Yeah, it’s not going to play well here in Colorado.


It gives the issue back to the states. It would not result in an outright prohibition of abortion nationwide.

Colorado would still have abortions
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
26784 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:16 pm to
we can abort most of the adult democrats, if they prefer
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108567 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

you understand that all repealing roe v. wade would do is throw the abortion issue back to individual state jurisdiction so if you blood thirsty phaggots in colorado want to keep mudering babies you're free to do so.


are all Coloradans as uninformed as you?


I understand that, but that still doesn’t play well out here.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108567 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

are your people this stupid? all row v wade will do is kick it back to the states. states can still choose to endorse abortions. some can ban it. no more federal oversight or endorsement.


I know what it is, god damnit, I’m just saying people out here are still very much for it.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62453 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:19 pm to
We should be judged by how we treat our most vulnerable. I’ve heard the hypocrisy of the left many times. Time to see what they really believe
Posted by crazyatthecamp
Member since Nov 2006
2100 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:23 pm to
Majority of women are pro life.

Vast majority of citizens are against 3rd trimester unless mom is physically dying.

That is where it should probably go. Ban 3rd trimester (very few) unless physically dying and kick the rest back to the states to deal with. Elective abortions past 25 weeks people do not support. This can be a winning issue if you dont get extreme.

If you want to ban all of them then be prepared to have plan B and birth control pills easily available to the public for free.

I would go free plan b and birth control and limited abortion areas nationally with zero elective abortions after 20 weeks unless mom is dying.

Someone convince me this is wrong. I want to hear others.

The progressives want abortion on demand thru delivery and after. I disagree bigly with that. The righties would say no birth control of plan b....but I would give into those to get get fewer abortions.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48320 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

That is where it should probably go. Ban 3rd trimester (very few) unless physically dying and kick the rest back to the states to deal with.


The federal government probably lacks the constitutional authority to make this law.

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (our current abortion law) isn’t prohibitive. It is a limit on state actions against individual choice.
Posted by crazyatthecamp
Member since Nov 2006
2100 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:28 pm to
So that option isnt possible? It's either all or none?

Help me out.
Posted by walley tux
DFW
Member since May 2020
794 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

I don’t think a state should be able to make a life saving medical treatment illegal. You do. That’s ok, we disagree on the extent of federal regulation in this case.




you can always travel to another state that allows abortion.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72716 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

you can always travel to another state that allows abortion.




yep
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

It means what I said. A woman comes into the ED at 20 weeks with a BP of 210/120. The fetus is not viable out of the womb and medications failed. The mother has two choices, abort the pregnancy or die. I believe in those situations that a decision to abort the pregnancy should not lead to arrest of a physician or the mother. Apparently some people here disagree.



Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:41 pm to
Colorado ?



Liberal cocksuckers !
Posted by GreenRockTiger
vortex to the whirlpool of despair
Member since Jun 2020
41722 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:47 pm to
This is exactly it!! Roe vs Wade is a Supreme Court decision - not legislation - the states should be able to handle this how their constituents want
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68693 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 1:54 pm to
im not really against abortion i just dont think it should be shoved in young womens faces as reproductive rights and that having several abortions is just birth control.

Oh and the fact that democrats want to be able to kill the baby as long as its toe is still inside.
Posted by RazorBroncs
Harding Bisons Fan
Member since Sep 2013
13540 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

There are rare instances where terminating a pregnancy is life saving for the mother. You can’t criminalize physicians who decide terminating the pregnancy of a dying preeclamptic woman is in their best interest and offer it as a treatment option.

...people on the right believe that a mother unnecessarily dying during pregnancy was all a part of Gods plan for her.



I've lived in the south and been a republican - that also goes to church every Sunday - my entire life... I've never ONCE heard anyone say or espouse this.

NOBODY wants to make medically-necessary abortions illegal, or criminalize the doctors that perform them; at least nobody that I've ever had contact with in any way.

I don't think you're a liberal/Dem based on the context, but this is the kind of misinformed view of pro-life people they run around and villainze people with. Because pro-choice people have a misunderstanding of what the opposing side actually wants and is saying, the two sides will always be at odds.

Most people on the Right that want to overturn RvW simply want to take it back to a state's right to decide and remove the federal government and constitution from the equation. Your misinformed views only serve to further the left's incorrect opinion of us.
Posted by YipSkiddlyDooo
Member since Apr 2013
3640 posts
Posted on 9/19/20 at 2:32 pm to
quote:


you can always travel to another state that allows abortion.


Yup, uncontrollably hypertensive in an ICU and they’ll just have you head a few hundred (or maybe thousand) miles to another hospital in a state where these rare cases aren’t illegal to treat. Brilliant.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram