- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Our President wants you to know that our planes have become too complicated
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:34 pm to bamarep
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:34 pm to bamarep
He's right.
Just like cars are too complicated.
Hell, back in the old days even a moron like me could do a lot of their own work in a car because it was pretty damned simple.
Just like cars are too complicated.
Hell, back in the old days even a moron like me could do a lot of their own work in a car because it was pretty damned simple.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:39 pm to VOR
quote:
Sure he would. But I don’t think he’s a big believer in rail travel.
This is just a weird post. The left's fascination with choo choo trains is mental.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:44 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
What makes you think he doesn’t understand technology? There’s a high probability he understands aviation technology much better than you do.
Right. The guy actually owned his own 737 and now has his personal 757.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:46 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Right. The guy actually owned his own 737 and now has his personal 757.
Oh, Trumpkins. Don't ever change.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:56 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Greg Feith NTSB comments on Atlas Air crash Gregory Allen "Greg" Feith is an American former Senior Air Safety Investigator with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Today on Denver News Channel 9, while commenting on the 737 Max crashes, Greg Feith said this, verbatim: “...and a lot of carriers overseas, they are so automation dependent that they don’t know, based on their training, when to intervene, and if there is a problem they continue to try to use the automation. We’ve seen that now in three accidents. Lion Air, Ethiopian, and in fact, Atlas Air, the one that crashed in Houston. The automation was still coupled, the pilots didn’t hand fly the airplane when they lost control and even through the recovery they were fighting the automation.”
Posted on 3/12/19 at 12:58 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Okay, so how many more accidents would occur if we were still primarily piloted by just humans? 10X?
Posted on 3/12/19 at 1:01 pm to FredsGotSlacks
quote:bingo.
As a pilot I partly agree, one of the biggest issues we face is automation dependency and not knowing what the airplane is trying to do versus what you are intending to do. Lots of unfortunate stories out there of the airplane flying the pilots and not the other way around.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 1:17 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Greg Feith NTSB comments on Atlas Air crash Gregory Allen "Greg" Feith is an American former Senior Air Safety Investigator with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Today on Denver News Channel 9, while commenting on the 737 Max crashes, Greg Feith said this, verbatim: “...and a lot of carriers overseas, they are so automation dependent that they don’t know, based on their training, when to intervene, and if there is a problem they continue to try to use the automation. We’ve seen that now in three accidents. Lion Air, Ethiopian, and in fact, Atlas Air, the one that crashed in Houston. The automation was still coupled, the pilots didn’t hand fly the airplane when they lost control and even through the recovery they were fighting the automation.”
So the pilots lacked sufficient training...gotcha
Posted on 3/12/19 at 1:17 pm to bamarep
I know a lot of retired military pilots. They say that they have no qualms about flying in an airline jet (very complex). However, they do not trust flying in small private planes (very simple).
The reason is not the degree of complexity. It's trust in maintenance crew. The airlines are very careful about who is working on their planes. He doesn't trust the dude checking a small private plane.
There are a lot more small private plane crashes than you think because the story only goes regional, not national.
The reason is not the degree of complexity. It's trust in maintenance crew. The airlines are very careful about who is working on their planes. He doesn't trust the dude checking a small private plane.
There are a lot more small private plane crashes than you think because the story only goes regional, not national.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 1:29 pm to VOR
quote:
Sure he would. But I don’t think he’s a big believer in rail travel.
Next time you think you have a cute little zinger, keep it under your hat. It's not your cup of tea, bruv.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 2:22 pm to bamarep
Trump is anti science. And so are all his supporters
Posted on 3/12/19 at 2:25 pm to TbirdSpur2010
I’ve never claimed to have a great stand up routine.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 2:29 pm to bamarep
So, basically our president is a Luddite.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 2:43 pm to Homesick Tiger
Technology always fails at some point and relying on it too much takes away the art of humans manually performing tasks.
Examples are flying
Driving (watch car chases on YouTube from old 70s-80s movies. The art of stunt driving in a 460 hp land yacht is gone these days. For example watch the French Connection car chase.
Also things like physics and engineering equations are done through computer. How many people today could write out those formulas by hand?
Examples are flying
Driving (watch car chases on YouTube from old 70s-80s movies. The art of stunt driving in a 460 hp land yacht is gone these days. For example watch the French Connection car chase.
Also things like physics and engineering equations are done through computer. How many people today could write out those formulas by hand?
Posted on 3/12/19 at 2:49 pm to bamarep
Modern airplane systems aren't that fricking complicated.
Posted on 3/12/19 at 2:56 pm to bamarep
wow 61 upvotes on this foolishness 
Posted on 3/12/19 at 2:57 pm to 90proofprofessional
i'm not even sure what he's asking for here
Posted on 3/12/19 at 3:37 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
And, it is more reliable by far
As someone who had both a 2017 Ram and a 72 Chevy pickup I bought for 900 bucks in high school 15 years ago as my first vehicle and all I did was change the plugs and put a new carburetor on it (did body work and interior but mechanically that was all I did) front end, engine except carb and transmission was all original.
I drove the 72 Chevy 40 miles a day 5 days a week to school and back for 2 years. Never broke down. Had 175,000 miles on it.
That 2017 Ram went through 2 fuel pumps, had to get a new front differential, and engine rebuilt due to a worn cam shaft in less than 80k miles.
So you’re wrong here.
Popular
Back to top



0









