- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ohio Issue One will fail. There will be abortions on demand for women, no restrictions
Posted on 10/26/23 at 6:11 pm to teamjackson
Posted on 10/26/23 at 6:11 pm to teamjackson
quote:
1, because a woman's body is her own God damn business.
Why can’t you people be honest with yourselves and admit the truth.
You are in favor of women being allowed to kill their unborn child.
And admit it is not her body she is killing. The truth is hard to face sometimes.
You favor murder under the correct circumstances. Be honest
Posted on 10/26/23 at 6:33 pm to Deplorableinohio
Those aren't Conservatives. Those are libertarians.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:28 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
The less our government, at any level, makes decisions for us the better.
On brand asininity
Posted on 10/26/23 at 7:31 pm to Deplorableinohio
quote:
Wow. All of them, 11 boomers, said it should not have been on the ballot because it’s a woman’s choice and body.
Local control has been the Republican mantra for decades. This is what will happen. Sorry you don’t like what you wanted.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 8:22 pm to Guntoter1
quote:
Why can’t you people be honest with yourselves and admit the truth. You are in favor of women being allowed to kill their unborn child. And admit it is not her body she is killing. The truth is hard to face sometimes. You favor murder under the correct circumstances. Be honest
And you’re in favor of a woman carrying a nonviable pregnancy in her body without proper medication to expel her bodily tissue to prevent any life threatening symptoms? Who would be the murderer then?
Posted on 10/26/23 at 8:26 pm to teamjackson
quote:
It's none of my damn business and it shouldn't be our governments', either.
I’m one of the few small government conservatives in this website but murder is the governments business. So is fetuscide.
I’m in the minority here. The majority don’t see it as murder.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:01 pm to ChampKind
quote:
And you’re in favor of a woman carrying a nonviable pregnancy in her body without proper medication to expel her bodily tissue to prevent any life threatening symptoms? Who would be the murderer then?
This is exactly what I’m talking about. You believe your own lies. Lol.
If the pregnancy is no viable then the child is already dead.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:05 pm to ChampKind
Also please explain to me if a fetus must be removed to save the life of the mother why do you feel the need to not just remove the child but to also kill it with scissors?
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:08 pm to teamjackson
quote:
I'll be voting Yes on Issue 1, because a woman's body is her own God damn business.
Anytime you find yourself squarely on the “they’re not really people” side of the argument, you might need to take a step back and think about the issue again.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:11 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
On brand asininity
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:15 pm to Deplorableinohio
Statutes in Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia require the written consent of the patient's spouse to voluntary sterilization (i.e. vasectomy)
Are they ok with this?
Are they ok with this?
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:18 pm to teamjackson
quote:
I'll be voting Yes on Issue 1, because a woman's body is her own God damn business
She already made the choice regarding her own body by letting some loser nut inside her. Now it’s not just her body
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
So what defines a 'body' these days? They're showing up left and right... right??
Define the course of time and the biologics of the human genome.. Can't wait to read your diary.
Define the course of time and the biologics of the human genome.. Can't wait to read your diary.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:19 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
I thought we wanted it to be decided at the State level.
We did and do.
And now a person who lives in a state that is about to vote on the matter is expressing his opinion on it. I agree with him. But here is the good part. Even if Ohio voted to allow abortion right up til the the due date, that doesn’t mean my state has too. And if my state does I can choose to leave my state and go to a neighboring state that feels the way I do. Before it would have meant me moving out of the country which would be a bit more challenging for some folks.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:23 pm to financetiger38
quote:
She already made the choice regarding her own body by letting some loser nut inside her. Now it’s not just her body
How would you explain/tip-toe around telling an underage girl who was impregnated by a family member that 'it was some loser who nutted inside her' aka her damn Father/Brother/Uncle/You name it??
Please, explain it like I'm five.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:26 pm to ThatBaw
quote:
legalize murdering whoever you want on the street
Apples and oranges, really.
Murderers pose a threat to you and me.
Women who have abortions pose no threat to you and me, just their fetuses that would largely be born fatherless into poverty to mothers who don’t want them.
Abortions are a symptom and banning them doesn’t target the disease. It also is a recipe to lose winnable elections.
This post was edited on 10/26/23 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:42 pm to Norbert
“Just let the slave states have their slaves”
“They pose no threat to you or me”
“They’re not really people”
“They pose no threat to you or me”
“They’re not really people”
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:44 pm to Norbert
quote:
Women who have abortions pose no threat to you and me, just their fetuses that would largely be born fatherless into poverty to mothers who don’t want them.
Lmao. This country loves people born fatherless into poverty to mothers who don’t want them.
We just let 22 million of them into the country in the last three years.
But I get your point.
You are ok with killing unwanted poor people
Posted on 10/26/23 at 9:47 pm to Norbert
quote:
just their fetuses that would largely be born fatherless into poverty to mothers who don’t want them.
Imagine the hubris it takes to type this.
Posted on 10/26/23 at 10:21 pm to Guntoter1
quote:
But I get your point.
Thank goodness!
Back to top


1




