Started By
Message

re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread

Posted on 4/28/26 at 11:56 am to
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27327 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 11:56 am to
Iran's Islamic Republic with nuclear weapons would be 1000 times worse than North Korea.
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
11374 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 12:11 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

Translated from Persian:

We are witnessing an uprising in Tehran beginning to draw energy and momentum.

The army of the hungry is taking shape and gathering force.

Fear of the regime in certain parts of Tehran no longer exists; it is turning into anger.

A particular rumor is now spreading, especially in Tehran and Ahvaz: the burning of proxy forces once the uprising begins.
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
11374 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 12:13 pm to
Now we see one of the reasons Pakistan was so eager to host talks and push for the war to end, they are about to run out of LNG.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

Pakistan is facing its worst energy crisis in years, with rolling blackouts lasting up to 14 hours in rural areas. The government has imposed austerity measures, including two-hour daily power cuts, a four-day work week, halved fuel allocations for government vehicles, and even asked cricket fans to watch matches from home to save fuel. Subsidies were scrapped and fuel prices raised.
Nearly all of Pakistan’s LNG comes from Qatar, but shipments stopped in March due to regional disruptions. This has forced the country to buy expensive spot-market LNG for the first time in over two years. Meanwhile, Pakistan secured $1.2 billion from the IMF and $3 billion from Saudi Arabia to support its reserves.

- Financial Post.
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
3400 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

JUST IN: ???????? United Kingdom summons Iran's Ambassador.


Any chance King Charles sent a message across after speaking with Trump?
Posted by Free888
Member since Oct 2019
3400 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 12:15 pm to
You can bet that the rail lines in Iran will be the targets of any new attacks. Not really important internally, but removes another option of transporting oil to China.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
110300 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

JUST IN: ???????? United Kingdom summons Iran's Ambassador.


Any chance King Charles sent a message across after speaking with Trump?


More likely that the UK wants to express solidarity with the Iranian Regime given their common Muslim heritage and dislike for the US and Israel.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
92152 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 12:25 pm to
Listening to the radio

They are saying he was summoned because Iranian comments were geared toward stirring up the Muslims in the UK

Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
11374 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Any chance King Charles sent a message across after speaking with Trump?


Highly unlikely he would get involved in the process. The King's role is mainly ceremonial at this point. The only reason he is visiting the US is because it's "soft" diplomacy, which is about the only type he engages in.
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
11374 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
5468 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 12:49 pm to
Maybe he’ll stop by Pahlavi’s place in Maryland before heading back across the pond.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27516 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Listening to the radio

They are saying he was summoned because Iranian comments were geared toward stirring up the Muslims in the UK


Confirming what psych tiger said.
This post was edited on 4/28/26 at 1:02 pm
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
24401 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

They are saying he was summoned because Iranian comments were geared toward stirring up the Muslims in the UK

Which is a massive ringing endorsement for open borders.

The value proposition at this point is something like "lets bring a bunch of people without any marketable skills, have a fierce dislike of our native culture, require assistance programs to prevent them from robbing and looting our stores and who are prone at the provocation of a foreign government to rise up against our government and commit terror acts. Oh, and they rape our women and children at an unprecedented rate while screaming racism when held accountable."
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39826 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

They are saying he was summoned because Iranian comments were geared toward stirring up the Muslims in the UK



Specifically Iranians. This is the second time in as many months that the Iranian ambassador to the UK has been summoned.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39826 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Which is a massive ringing endorsement for open borders.



Iran doesn't really have that much reach to get support from Muslims broadly. They originally posted the message in Persian, which is a limited regional language at this point, and represent a minority of Muslims in terms of sect. Iranians outside of Iran, unlike other countries, generally tend to be very secular.
Posted by BayouBengal51
Forest Hill, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2006
11374 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:35 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:


IRAN THREATENS UAE
An Iranian lawmaker is now openly threatening the United Arab Emirates.

Ali Khezrian, a member of Iran’s national security committee, accused the United Arab Emirates of preparing to support the United States in a potential future strike on Iran.

His warning:
If Abu Dhabi aligns with Washington, it will be “taught a lesson.”
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
92152 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:43 pm to
Trying to get a little international protests etc going
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
27516 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Iran doesn't really have that much reach to get support from Muslims broadly. They originally posted the message in Persian, which is a limited regional language at this point, and represent a minority of Muslims in terms of sect. Iranians outside of Iran, unlike other countries, generally tend to be very secular.


It wasn't meant to be sent to Iranians abroad, as you said their support for the IRGC is minute. It is meant for devout muslims abroad. Many of which know how to use a google translate app or simply read it online like we do... already translated.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39826 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 1:52 pm to
Yeah, but there aren't that many Shia and most of the Shia that might like the regime already live near the region. Hence why they can have regional militias but not real international reach, unlike the Sunni terrorist groups.
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
64337 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 2:00 pm to
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
30140 posts
Posted on 4/28/26 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

an's Islamic Republic with nuclear weapons would be 1000 times worse than North Korea.


1000 times my be understating it. Likely billions worse, if we look at the value of a human life.

DPRK has them for defense, essentially, and maybe a little bargaining for food/supplies when they run low. Their stance is you don't mess with us, we won't mess with you.

Iran would use them for offense. No doubt.
first pageprev pagePage 809 of 1221Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram