- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:14 pm to GOP_Tiger
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:14 pm to GOP_Tiger
quote:
My views are exactly the same as those expressed by President Trump two months ago
Be that as it may, your support appears to have done a 180 now (as I suspected it would) with very little understanding of where this is actually going. You've started quoting Iranian govt propaganda with no indication of suspicion or doubt, while criticizing the Trump administration for everything they say.
quote:
Their [the left] views are the complete opposite of mine.
For somebody who's complete opposite of left, you seem to end up in agreement quite often. Your criticism of Trump's management of the war sounds exactly like the left, just for "different reasons". You're a huge supporter of US involvement in Ukraine, should probably hang a Ukrainian flag by your name like so many of the leftists have done. And honestly, when you say things like, Now all the anti-Americanism is on the Right, it's hard to take any claim of "complete opposite" of left at face value. It's okay to admit that you're a leftist; hyperbolic rhetoric aside, Trump's not going to put you in a camp.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:16 pm to Ailsa
quote:
No money will exchange hands.
How will any of us ever know?
Meanwhile, 2 months from now, all the mullahs and IRGC leadership will be driving new Ferraris, Lambos and McLarens through the streets of Tehran.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:24 pm to TulsaSooner78
quote:
quote:
No money will exchange hands.
How will any of us ever know?
Meanwhile, 2 months from now, all the mullahs and IRGC leadership will be driving new Ferraris, Lambos and McLarens through the streets of Tehran.
Bessent?
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:28 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Bessent?
I was making a joke.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 1:38 pm to Ailsa
quote:
Bessent?
Maybe, but there is plausible deniability for Donald/us built into the equation. Billions of frozen funds can be sent without us having any binding or legal say in the transaction.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:02 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Maybe, but there is plausible deniability for Donald/us built into the equation. Billions of frozen funds can be sent without us having any binding or legal say in the transaction.
I think most of that money is in Arab banks, so we just blame it on them.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 2:50 pm to TulsaSooner78
quote:
I think most of that money is in Arab banks, so we just blame it on them.
The Patriot Act was the worst legislation ever enacted in the US.
For a decade we enforced a no fly list where you didn’t even know you were listed until you tried to fly, and after your ticket was canceled you weren’t entitled to know the reason.
It’s refreshing to see the international community finally push back. It’s gotten absurd that the US government can just arbitrarily dictate seizure of any international asset as a precondition to be part of the banking community.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 3:19 pm to lsuconnman
quote:
The Patriot Act was the worst legislation ever enacted in the US.
Be careful. You'll be labeled a Ron Paul / Rand Paul / Thomas Massie apologist infected with TDS.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 3:27 pm to lsuconnman
quote:
The Patriot Act was the worst legislation ever enacted in the US.
Even the name of the act itself is manipulative.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 3:30 pm to PeteRose
quote:
PeteRose
What are your thoughts on this whole Texas Tech QB gambling issue?
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:07 pm to LegendInMyMind
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
?Special forces units attacked the gatherings of Basij and IRGC members at 9 PM in several parts of Tehran using batons and tear gas.
?Once the surrender document is signed, they're done for. All that's left is the right moment for the call to action and overthrow.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:10 pm to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
?I request from all dear opposition members: go read the 14-article text once, and stop using the word "agreement."
?This is called a surrender document.
?They are surrendering—where was the agreement????
?After they fall to their knees, it will be our turn: the call to action, the streets, and revenge for our 50 thousand Javidians.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:26 pm to ItTakesAThief
quote:
The left - Trump can’t bomb Iran. Trump must solve through diplomacy.
The left - Trump lost the war. Trump made a bad deal. Trump is weak ( because the left does not support the use of real American military power) and Iran out maneuvered Trump which is the inevitable conclusion when the left does not allow the use of our best negotiating tool which is our military
The left?
You've had self-proclaimed hardcore "conservatives" in this thread doing the exact same thing.
Now that's the joke.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:32 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
The Iran Deal would start to destroy the regime from within. And Araghchi is trapped. It's lose-lose for the Islamic Republic government.
Yeah...anyone thinking the IRGC comes out stronger in all this is mistaken. The infighting with the folks who "made the deal" and those who wish to die for the virgins is probably going to be pretty rough.
Thanks for hanging in there with the posts hawg.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:41 pm to hawgfaninc
Those in the internal insurrection against the IRGC would make credible forward air controllers pointing out targets...
Posted on 6/13/26 at 4:53 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
that poster ("GOP") paints themself as a conservative
How many people do you think GOP_Tiger is? If you are going to keep referring to individuals as “they/them” then be honest and put a rainbow flag in your profile.
Posted on 6/13/26 at 5:18 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 6/13/26 at 5:33 pm to Penrod
quote:
How many people do you think GOP_Tiger is? If you are going to keep referring to individuals as “they/them” then be honest and put a rainbow flag in your profile.
I refer to a third person as they or them when I have no knowledge of their gender. Note my use of a 3rd person plural pronoun (or more accurately, determiner) in the previous sentence. The antecedent of "their" is the singular number, gender neutral noun "person". I could use a slash mark between both genders (he/she, him/her, his/hers), but third person plural has been acceptable in that circumstance for a long time. The Oxford English Dictionary traces such use of singular "they" back to circa year 1375, but says it was likely in usage prior to that.
My writing style may be old fashioned, but I am up to at least 14th century standards most of the time, with the help of the edit feature. But thanks for the tip and let me know if you spot any errors in the future and I'll probably correct them if it seems worthwhile.
This post was edited on 6/13/26 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 6/13/26 at 5:40 pm to BayouBengal51
They are securing their uranium by bombing tunnels making it impossible to get too…
Interesting.
Interesting.
Popular
Back to top


0









