0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:34 pm to TroutGuy
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:34 pm to TroutGuy
The people of Iran need free Internet to see which truly happening. We need them to have free Internet so they can post freely about what is going on in Iran. Musk… discount please?
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:35 pm to Ailsa
Bombing them isn’t going to change their negotiating position.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:37 pm to Decatur
Depends on what we bomb.
I think we need to bomb cultural sites and perhaps drop biological agents on IRGC bases
I think we need to bomb cultural sites and perhaps drop biological agents on IRGC bases
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:38 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:38 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:39 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:39 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:40 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:40 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:41 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:41 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
None of that effectively opens Hormuz. The countdown will continue.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:41 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:42 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:44 pm to TroutGuy
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Washington is demanding a 60 day downblend commitment to enter talks with Tehran on the nuclear file. This secures verifiable degradation within the 30-60 negotiation window for the final deal on the file. If no final deal is struck, Iran walks away with no sanctions relief, a diluted stockpile it cannot easily or quickly enrich since its enrichment capacity has been degraded, exposed intel on its program status, and the threat of renewed hostilities.
Put simply, Washington is demanding the Batna is painful for Tehran as a precondition for talks. Iran has not responded to the demand for two weeks, instead escalating against Gulf countries, firing at Israel and then downing a US Apache helo in the Gulf. The US response is aimed at reinforcing leverage and compelling Tehran to sign the MoU letting IAEA inspectors in to begin logging, recovering and diluting Iran’s enriched stockpile immediately.
Assuming this is accurate, and it likely is to some extent given the recent IAEA demands of Iran, I have what seems like a rather important question:
How would this plan be possible if what we have been told about Iran's uranium with it being buried to such an extent that only the US or China has the technology to get to it/unearth it and that process would take a while? This seems counter to our reported stance and plan as it has been presented over the past weeks.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:46 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:47 pm to Decatur
It might if we kill the right ones
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:50 pm to BayouBengal51
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:50 pm to noon0707
Do you think Israel gets in some hits. Seems like Iran’s air defense system is working beautiful.
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:58 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
How would this plan be possible if what we have been told about Iran's uranium with it being buried to such an extent that only the US or China has the technology to get to it/unearth it and that process would take a while? This seems counter to our reported stance and plan as it has been presented over the past weeks.
I can only assume that we would be the ones retrieving it with IAEA oversight on hand as it's dug up and then diluted. This is all in the instance that Iran actually agrees to this MOU to dilute their uranium, which would then open a 30-60 day window for actual negotiations to begin. I'm assuming that 30-60 day window isn't the timeframe that they expect to have it dug up and diluted, but Iran allowing the project to actually start peacefully would. Work would be ongoing while negotiating happens.
That is just my best guess.
On another note, it now appears that Trump has been stalling and making contradictory statements for the last several weeks because he didn't want to give away that we were sneaking tankers out in the middle of the night. He also kept from escalating too far in order to keep the attention away from the Strait as much as possible while we were working under the cover of night.
I hope they eventually tell us everything that was happening behind the scenes when this is all over
Posted on 6/10/26 at 4:58 pm to BayouBengal51
Page 1069 of 1289
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News