- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama's CDC study on Firearms.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:59 pm to ShortyRob
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:59 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
There are fewer deaths now per 100K from firearms than there were 30 years ago.
There has been a global reduction in crime. There has not, however, been a corresponding global reduction in gun crime in the US with respect to the rest of the world.
That is, we're still monstrously higher than every other comparable country. Let's fix that.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:00 pm to Hoops
quote:
Has anyone posted a study that looks at gun violence vs socioeconomic status?
If you'd like to propose a UBI for everyone to raise their SES and reduce violence, go wild man.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:00 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Better to have said "I don't need to have specifics since it was invented solely for military use"
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:00 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
I'm starting to think Chicken might pay you to post BS on here to drive up traffic.
I don't get ban warnings in these threads anymore, so who knows.
(jinx)
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:01 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
There has been a global reduction in crime. There has not, however, been a corresponding global reduction in gun crime in the US with respect to the rest of the world.
That is, we're still monstrously higher than every other comparable country. Let's fix that.
Then you have to look at the inner cities...
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:01 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Also, perusing my local gun store's website the AR-15s models are listed between $1400-1500, and the mini-14 around $900. If you think they're identical, clearly you should talk to gun store operators.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:01 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
you think is an actual point?
When your point is "it should be a civilian weapon" it's absolutely a point.
You think a weapon developed solely for the military is somehow civilian?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:03 pm to BamaAtl
quote:When you can not define what functionality makes it unsuitable for civilian possession—you have NO argument.
When your point is "it should be a civilian weapon" it's absolutely a point.
And you have yet to indenting you any such functionality despite being asked multiple times by multiple people.
quote:Educate me. What functions make it unsuitable for civilian ownership. List them. Specifically.
You think a weapon developed solely for the military is somehow civilian?
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:04 pm to BamaAtl
You have a really hard time grasping the difference in full auto and semi-auto guns and how they operate differently from each other.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:08 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
There has not, however, been a corresponding global reduction in gun crime in the US with respect to the rest of the world.
So how does the US's violent crime rate compare to other countries?
The US ranks 25th in firearm homicide rate.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:09 pm to BamaAtl
quote:We have fewer than we had 30 years ago. You aren't satisfied.
Fewer deaths by firearms. What's your definition of success for inaction on gun law?
So. "Fewer" isn't an answer. Try again.
quote:I made no presuppositions regarding what you advocate.
Again, I'm not advocating that someone burst into every house and grab your personal guns
quote:Yes.
Do you assign any value to lives being lost to gun violence
quote:That's not how weighing things work.
and if so, why a lesser value than someone owning a gun?
For example. I assign value to saving lives on the highway. And, I assign value to efficient transportation of people and goods. If both of those weren't true I would either advocate for highway speed limits of 25mph or, I would advocate that we all get cars that can do Formula 1 speeds with no speed limits.
quote:Again. We already achieved this in the last 30 years.
Fewer deaths. Fewer injuries would be a good secondary outcome, and better mental health care treatment a great tertiary one provided that's part of the package.
Yet. Here we are.
If you can't define success, then people like me know that you will simply claim failure again if the number isn't zero.
I think you understand that which is why you're holding on to the word fewer.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:09 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
You think a weapon developed solely for the military is somehow civilian?
Swords and bow and arrows were originally designed for military use.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:10 pm to wickowick
quote:
Then you have to look at the inner cities...
And to deal with the problem of the inner cities, you have to look at the entire country, since that's where they get the guns in the inner cities.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:11 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
When you can not define what functionality makes it unsuitable for civilian possession
It killed 17 people in a matter of minutes and has no relevant civilian use.
quote:
Educate me.
All the teachers in the world given all the time since creation can't educate you on this - you've chosen to ignore data for emotion, all because you have an odd fetish.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:11 pm to wickowick
quote:
You have a really hard time grasping the difference in full auto and semi-auto guns and how they operate differently from each other.
Remind me, did a full auto or semi-auto gun kill 17 people in Florida last month in a matter of minutes?
That's what I thought.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:13 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
So how does the US's violent crime rate compare to other countries?
US is 92nd in intentional homicide rate.
quote:
The US ranks 25th in firearm homicide rate.
Exactly. That's a problem.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:13 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Thats not unique to he AR-15. Try again.
It killed 17 people in a matter of minutes and has no relevant civilian use.
quote:That’s not an answer.
All the teachers in the world given all the time since creation can't educate you on this - you've chosen to ignore data for emotion, all because you have an odd fetish.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:13 pm to BamaAtl
So you want to ban semi-auto guns, glad you admitted that.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:14 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
We have fewer than we had 30 years ago. You aren't satisfied.
So. "Fewer" isn't an answer.
Fewer to the point that our numbers are in line with other comparable countries.
You didn't answer my question - what's your definition of success for inaction?
quote:
That's not how weighing things work.
What weights do you assign that you're unwilling to enact stricter gun laws to save lives? What's the relative weight you have for each? Please, try again.
quote:
We already achieved this in the last 30 years.
We achieved this despite our lax gun laws - now let's achieve it to be in line with the rest of the developed world because of stricter gun laws.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:15 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
It killed 17 people in a matter of minutes and has no relevant civilian use.
absolutely false
Stephen Willeford for one I know would disagree.
Popular
Back to top


4




