Started By
Message

re: Obama's CDC study on Firearms.

Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

There are fewer deaths now per 100K from firearms than there were 30 years ago.


There has been a global reduction in crime. There has not, however, been a corresponding global reduction in gun crime in the US with respect to the rest of the world.

That is, we're still monstrously higher than every other comparable country. Let's fix that.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Has anyone posted a study that looks at gun violence vs socioeconomic status?


If you'd like to propose a UBI for everyone to raise their SES and reduce violence, go wild man.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63232 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Better to have said "I don't need to have specifics since it was invented solely for military use"
you think is an actual point?
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

I'm starting to think Chicken might pay you to post BS on here to drive up traffic.


I don't get ban warnings in these threads anymore, so who knows.

(jinx)
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
46352 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

There has been a global reduction in crime. There has not, however, been a corresponding global reduction in gun crime in the US with respect to the rest of the world.

That is, we're still monstrously higher than every other comparable country. Let's fix that.


Then you have to look at the inner cities...
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63232 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Also, perusing my local gun store's website the AR-15s models are listed between $1400-1500, and the mini-14 around $900. If you think they're identical, clearly you should talk to gun store operators.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

you think is an actual point?


When your point is "it should be a civilian weapon" it's absolutely a point.

You think a weapon developed solely for the military is somehow civilian?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63232 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

When your point is "it should be a civilian weapon" it's absolutely a point.
When you can not define what functionality makes it unsuitable for civilian possession—you have NO argument.

And you have yet to indenting you any such functionality despite being asked multiple times by multiple people.

quote:

You think a weapon developed solely for the military is somehow civilian?
Educate me. What functions make it unsuitable for civilian ownership. List them. Specifically.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 3:05 pm
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
46352 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:04 pm to
You have a really hard time grasping the difference in full auto and semi-auto guns and how they operate differently from each other.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15062 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

There has not, however, been a corresponding global reduction in gun crime in the US with respect to the rest of the world.


So how does the US's violent crime rate compare to other countries?

The US ranks 25th in firearm homicide rate.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:09 pm to
quote:



Fewer deaths by firearms. What's your definition of success for inaction on gun law?
We have fewer than we had 30 years ago. You aren't satisfied.

So. "Fewer" isn't an answer. Try again.

quote:


Again, I'm not advocating that someone burst into every house and grab your personal guns
I made no presuppositions regarding what you advocate.

quote:

Do you assign any value to lives being lost to gun violence
Yes.

quote:

and if so, why a lesser value than someone owning a gun?

That's not how weighing things work.

For example. I assign value to saving lives on the highway. And, I assign value to efficient transportation of people and goods. If both of those weren't true I would either advocate for highway speed limits of 25mph or, I would advocate that we all get cars that can do Formula 1 speeds with no speed limits.

quote:


Fewer deaths. Fewer injuries would be a good secondary outcome, and better mental health care treatment a great tertiary one provided that's part of the package.

Again. We already achieved this in the last 30 years.

Yet. Here we are.

If you can't define success, then people like me know that you will simply claim failure again if the number isn't zero.

I think you understand that which is why you're holding on to the word fewer.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15062 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

You think a weapon developed solely for the military is somehow civilian?


Swords and bow and arrows were originally designed for military use.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Then you have to look at the inner cities...


And to deal with the problem of the inner cities, you have to look at the entire country, since that's where they get the guns in the inner cities.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

When you can not define what functionality makes it unsuitable for civilian possession


It killed 17 people in a matter of minutes and has no relevant civilian use.

quote:

Educate me.


All the teachers in the world given all the time since creation can't educate you on this - you've chosen to ignore data for emotion, all because you have an odd fetish.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

You have a really hard time grasping the difference in full auto and semi-auto guns and how they operate differently from each other.


Remind me, did a full auto or semi-auto gun kill 17 people in Florida last month in a matter of minutes?

That's what I thought.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

So how does the US's violent crime rate compare to other countries?


US is 92nd in intentional homicide rate.

quote:

The US ranks 25th in firearm homicide rate.


Exactly. That's a problem.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63232 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

It killed 17 people in a matter of minutes and has no relevant civilian use.
Thats not unique to he AR-15. Try again.

quote:

All the teachers in the world given all the time since creation can't educate you on this - you've chosen to ignore data for emotion, all because you have an odd fetish.
That’s not an answer.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 3:14 pm
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
46352 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:13 pm to
So you want to ban semi-auto guns, glad you admitted that.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

We have fewer than we had 30 years ago. You aren't satisfied.

So. "Fewer" isn't an answer.


Fewer to the point that our numbers are in line with other comparable countries.

You didn't answer my question - what's your definition of success for inaction?

quote:

That's not how weighing things work.


What weights do you assign that you're unwilling to enact stricter gun laws to save lives? What's the relative weight you have for each? Please, try again.

quote:

We already achieved this in the last 30 years.


We achieved this despite our lax gun laws - now let's achieve it to be in line with the rest of the developed world because of stricter gun laws.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
15062 posts
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

It killed 17 people in a matter of minutes and has no relevant civilian use.


absolutely false

Stephen Willeford for one I know would disagree.
Jump to page
Page First 21 22 23 24 25 ... 58
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 23 of 58Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram