- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:39 pm to bfniii
quote:
exactly what i thought. your crappy chart failed to define the term "better."
Fewer deaths. Do you need it explained to you, it's a pretty simple chart tbh.
Guess you never got to the class on charts in 4th grade before mama pulled you out of the liberal school.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:40 pm to bfniii
quote:
1. it doesn't stop mass killings
It does
quote:
2. it doesn't even stop mass killlings WITH THAT WEAPON
It does
quote:
3. it's only a matter of time before that list starts to grow, i.e. slippery slope
Nah
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:40 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Dig through the old military contract and I'm sure you can find them.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:40 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Fewer deaths.
Wrong.
I can explain it if you need me to do that.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:41 pm to bfniii
quote:
addressing the gun is addressing the EFFECT, not the CAUSE
No, it's addressing both the cause and the effect.
quote:
not analogous and it's totally stupid for you to make this statement
You not knowing how to read a chart doesn't make an argument stupid.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:41 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Bit more than quite, if we're being honest (you're not being honest).
says the poster that said a mini-14 and an AR-15 are different firearms because one has a wooden stock.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:42 pm to BamaAtl
I'll also keep bringing this up just in case anyone considers taking you seriously...
quote:
We can talk about "fully auto" and vehicle registrations instead if you need more time.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:42 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Fewer deaths. Do you need it explained to you, it's a pretty simple chart tbh.
There are fewer deaths now per 100K from firearms than there were 30 years ago.
Yet, you aren't satisfied.
So. "Fewer" clearly needs some definition. Otherwise, we'd already be done with the issue.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:42 pm to BamaAtl
quote:No one.
Who says we're just trying to stop mass shootings with stricter gun laws?
quote:Uuuuhh. You were the one that claimed the AR-15 specifically is a tool for mass shootings. Just following your claim—you now call “weird”.
What a weird boundary for you to put on it.
You should check your scripts again
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:46 pm to BamaAtl
Has anyone posted a study that looks at gun violence vs socioeconomic status?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:46 pm to BamaAtl
I'm starting to think Chicken might pay you to post BS on here to drive up traffic.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:53 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
What's your definition of success in terms of gun law?
Fewer deaths by firearms. What's your definition of success for inaction on gun law?
quote:
When evaluating the gun issue, do you assign any value to a population being armed?
Again, I'm not advocating that someone burst into every house and grab your personal guns. Do you assign any value to lives being lost to gun violence, and if so, why a lesser value than someone owning a gun?
quote:
f we get new gun law, how will we know it worked to your satisfaction?
Fewer deaths. Fewer injuries would be a good secondary outcome, and better mental health care treatment a great tertiary one provided that's part of the package.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:53 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
So no.
No worries.
I'm patient.
Apparently not very good at analysis - maybe shift some patience into that for about a week and you'll be on track again.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:54 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
you could have just said “I have no idea”.
Better to have said "I don't need to have specifics since it was invented solely for military use"
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:55 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Wrong.
Vertical axis, champ. Like I said, you're shitty at analysis.
Like, world-beating shitty. It would be sad if it weren't so funny sometimes.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:57 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
What's your definition of success in terms of gun law?
quote:
Fewer deaths by firearms. What's your definition of success for inaction on gun law?
You are still fixated on deaths by firearms. Still don't care about rape, robberies, aggravated assault, etc...
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:58 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Do you assign any value to lives being lost to gun violence, and if so, why a lesser value than someone owning a gun?
I assign more value to innocent victims than perpetrators of the crime, but your statistics value them both the same...
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:58 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
says the poster that said a mini-14 and an AR-15 are different firearms because one has a wooden stock
I didn't say they were different because of that, you said they were different because of that.
Also, perusing my local gun store's website the AR-15s models are listed between $1400-1500, and the mini-14 around $900. If you think they're identical, clearly you should talk to gun store operators.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 2:58 pm to BamaAtl
quote:the strawman loaded question combo. Not easy to pull off.
Do you assign any value to lives being lost to gun violence, and if so, why a lesser value than someone owning a gun?
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 2:59 pm
Popular
Back to top



1




