Started By
Message
locked post

Obamahaters Lose Benghazi as an excuse to impeach the President

Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:25 am
Posted by samson'sseed
Augusta
Member since Aug 2013
2070 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:25 am
LINK

Turns out it was not an Al Queda attack and it was fueled by the video. The Obama administration didn't lie about this one afterall.

Obamahaters will have to find another excuse to impeach the President.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118835 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:27 am to
On the right, I don't think many care. Total focus on the 2014 midterms.
Posted by Count Chocula
Tier 5 and proud
Member since Feb 2009
63908 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Turns out it was not an Al Queda attack and it was fueled by the video.


So you believe everything the New York Times reports
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56532 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:29 am to
That's funny
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25361 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:30 am to
....and the Germans are bombing Pearl Harbor.
This post was edited on 12/31/13 at 9:32 am
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:31 am to
quote:

quote: Turns out it was not an Al Queda attack and it was fueled by the video.


As opposed to a well planned terrorist attack like he said in the debate?

GET THE TRANSCRIPT CANDY
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Turns out it was not an Al Queda attack and it was fueled by the video. The Obama administration didn't lie about this one afterall.



Turns out you have no idea what the Obama administration was accused of lying about.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52798 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:34 am to
quote:

samson'sseed


Wait a minute. So which part was Obama lying about?

First Obama said it was a video, when the world told him it wasn't about a video, and proof was shown to him and others about the sophistication of the attack and the fact that the video was made 6 months prior to the attack.

Then, Obama comes out and says he never said it was about a video, that it was a coordinated terrorist attack.

So which lie is correct? You let us know, champ.

Apparently, you were not the fastest swimmer in "samson's seed".
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29390 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Turns out you have no idea what the Obama administration was accused of lying about.


woops.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:34 am to
quote:

samson'sseed


Thanks for that bit of humor on a gray cold day.
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
9299 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:35 am to
Who the frick are you?


Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:36 am to
Shame on you for trying to demoralize our disadvantaged brethren at the start of a new year. Nothing has worked out the way they hoped... their hopes have been dashed as their allegations have proved false. Haven't they suffered enough?
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52798 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Rex


Come back to the thread where you insulted me, and actually give us your opinion on evolution, via the questions i asked.

Posted by stevengtiger
Member since Jul 2013
2778 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:38 am to
quote:

samson'sseed


Please be trolling. If not, read/watch real news.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52798 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Please be trolling. If not, read/watch real news.


What's funny, is that Rex was even arguing, during the Benghazi mess, that Obama said it was a terrorist act in the first place. Now he's saying the president's lying?

Rex, pick a lie, then follow it. You can't use both lies as your cover.
Posted by skinny domino
sebr
Member since Feb 2007
14341 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:39 am to
quote:

samson'sseed
you going to get slapped for quoting the NYTimes on the PT board - you got to go by faux news here - that is what about 85% of the folks on this board go by. faux news has got to keep Benghazi on the front burner - they hope it will slow Hillary's roll.
Posted by AlaTiger
America
Member since Aug 2006
21123 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:42 am to
No one ever said that it was Al Qaeda - or if they did, that was not the main point. The main point was that it was a terrorist attack.

It was not a spontaneous mob fueled by a Youtube video as the administration claimed. The NYTimes article says nothing to dispute that - they are only trying to muddy the waters to benefit Obama/Clinton.

This is dumb.
Posted by stevengtiger
Member since Jul 2013
2778 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:43 am to
quote:

faux news has got to keep Benghazi on the front burner


I am not saying to watch fox news or any other news channel but several senators(rep&dem) have said this NY Times Article is incorrect. Why quote something that is known to be false and advertise it as truth.


Wait... Sounds familiar the last few years.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52798 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:44 am to
quote:

skinny domino


Please enlighten the board. Which Obama lie was the truth? That Benghazi was about a video, or that Benghazi was a coordinated terrorist attack. He said both.

Smugness makes you stupid.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 12/31/13 at 9:46 am to
quote:

David D. Kirkpatrick
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram