- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Obama & Biden routinely handled sensitive government information through private Gmail
Posted on 5/4/26 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 5/4/26 at 6:37 pm
Now you know why they worked so hard to protect Hilary!!
Newly released documents from the National Archives confirm—beyond a shadow of a doubt—that then–Vice President Joe Biden and Barack Obama were in collusion-——routinely mishandling sensitive government information, which were reroutrd through private Gmail accounts.
Acts commonly described as “collusion” can violate various criminal laws. When high-ranking government officials work secretly to violate U.S. laws, they can be prosecuted for several offenses.
Here is the breakdown of the legal landscape:
1. What is “Collusion” Legally?
While “collusion” is often used in political discourse to mean improper, secretive cooperation with foreign or hostile entities, it is not a specific legal charge. The relevant criminal terms are conspiracy, aiding and abetting, or solicitation.
2. Potential Crimes in “Collusion”If “collusion” involves working with a foreign power to influence an election or violate other laws, it may trigger the following charges:Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371): This is the most common charge, covering agreements to interfere with government functions through deceit or dishonesty.
Foreign Contribution Violations (52 U.S.C. § 30121): It is illegal for a foreign national to contribute money or “anything of value” to a campaign. If government officials cooperate in receiving such value (e.g., hacked data), it is a crime.
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030): Assisting, advising, or facilitating foreign hackers (e.g., DNC emails) can violate this act.
Treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381): In extreme cases, if collusion involves aiding enemies during a declared war, it can be charged as treason, though this is rare.
3. Obstruction of Justice
Often, the act of “collusion” is less likely to be proven than the subsequent attempt to hide it. If officials lie to investigators or try to cover up the activity, they can be charged with:False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001): Lying to federal agents.Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1505/1512): Lying to Congress or coaching others to lie.
4. Special Considerations for Public Officials
High-ranking federal officials are subject to specific bribery, graft, and conflict-of-interest statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 201–227). Under § 201(b), soliciting, accepting, or agreeing to receive anything of value in exchange for an official act (a quid pro quo) is a serious felony.
Summary Table
Alleged Activity
Potential Legal Charge
Secretly helping foreign entities
Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371)
Accepting “dirt” on a political opponent from a foreign source
Campaign Finance Violation (52 U.S.C. § 30121)
Covering up contacts
False Statements / Obstruction (18 U.S.C. § 1001, 1512)
Offering official acts for favors
Bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201)
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Newly released documents from the National Archives confirm—beyond a shadow of a doubt—that then–Vice President Joe Biden and Barack Obama were in collusion-——routinely mishandling sensitive government information, which were reroutrd through private Gmail accounts.
Acts commonly described as “collusion” can violate various criminal laws. When high-ranking government officials work secretly to violate U.S. laws, they can be prosecuted for several offenses.
Here is the breakdown of the legal landscape:
1. What is “Collusion” Legally?
While “collusion” is often used in political discourse to mean improper, secretive cooperation with foreign or hostile entities, it is not a specific legal charge. The relevant criminal terms are conspiracy, aiding and abetting, or solicitation.
2. Potential Crimes in “Collusion”If “collusion” involves working with a foreign power to influence an election or violate other laws, it may trigger the following charges:Conspiracy to Defraud the United States (18 U.S.C. § 371): This is the most common charge, covering agreements to interfere with government functions through deceit or dishonesty.
Foreign Contribution Violations (52 U.S.C. § 30121): It is illegal for a foreign national to contribute money or “anything of value” to a campaign. If government officials cooperate in receiving such value (e.g., hacked data), it is a crime.
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030): Assisting, advising, or facilitating foreign hackers (e.g., DNC emails) can violate this act.
Treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381): In extreme cases, if collusion involves aiding enemies during a declared war, it can be charged as treason, though this is rare.
3. Obstruction of Justice
Often, the act of “collusion” is less likely to be proven than the subsequent attempt to hide it. If officials lie to investigators or try to cover up the activity, they can be charged with:False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001): Lying to federal agents.Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1505/1512): Lying to Congress or coaching others to lie.
4. Special Considerations for Public Officials
High-ranking federal officials are subject to specific bribery, graft, and conflict-of-interest statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 201–227). Under § 201(b), soliciting, accepting, or agreeing to receive anything of value in exchange for an official act (a quid pro quo) is a serious felony.
Summary Table
Alleged Activity
Potential Legal Charge
Secretly helping foreign entities
Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371)
Accepting “dirt” on a political opponent from a foreign source
Campaign Finance Violation (52 U.S.C. § 30121)
Covering up contacts
False Statements / Obstruction (18 U.S.C. § 1001, 1512)
Offering official acts for favors
Bribery (18 U.S.C. § 201)
Posted on 5/4/26 at 6:45 pm to Timeoday
If Solomon has knowledge of it, actual actions will be coming in short order.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 6:47 pm to StrangeBrew
Yep, that seems to be the modus operandi.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 6:54 pm to Timeoday
And nothing will happen.
Keep feeding the pig and following orders.
Keep feeding the pig and following orders.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 7:02 pm to Timeoday
quote:
Treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381): In extreme cases, if collusion involves aiding enemies during a declared war, it can be charged as treason, though this is rare.

Posted on 5/4/26 at 7:12 pm to Timeoday
You guys ever really pay attention to the videos these tweets replay?
The crawl at the bottom of the video at the 1:52 mark says "Senate advances
Dr Jay Bhattacharya's nomination for NIH director". He was nominated by Trump November 2024, and confirmed March 2025.
I'm guessing the info "King Solomon" was distributing didn't move the needle much for the last 17-18 months
But "RealRobert" got me to spend 2 minutes on his Tweet and watch the video, so I guess the joke's on me
The crawl at the bottom of the video at the 1:52 mark says "Senate advances
Dr Jay Bhattacharya's nomination for NIH director". He was nominated by Trump November 2024, and confirmed March 2025.
I'm guessing the info "King Solomon" was distributing didn't move the needle much for the last 17-18 months
But "RealRobert" got me to spend 2 minutes on his Tweet and watch the video, so I guess the joke's on me
Posted on 5/4/26 at 7:24 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381): In extreme cases, if collusion involves aiding enemies during a declared war, it can be charged as treason, though this is rare.
We haven’t had a declared war since 1942.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 7:40 pm to Timeoday
So what are republicans trying to distract from?
Is this about Hegseth’s wife sitting in on briefings?
I see. This is old. Wonder what the distraction was from at the time.
Is this about Hegseth’s wife sitting in on briefings?
I see. This is old. Wonder what the distraction was from at the time.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 7:42 pm
Posted on 5/4/26 at 7:42 pm to Timeoday
Why would Obama trust anything with that idiot.
It’s almost like he wanted to get Biden in trouble.
It’s almost like he wanted to get Biden in trouble.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 7:44 pm to Timeoday
Everything they accused Trump of doing is exactly what Biden & Obama did.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 8:09 pm to TBoy
quote:
Is this about Hegseth’s wife sitting in on briefings
Jill Biden ran a cabinet meeting. Even WORSE crack head hunter sat in daily briefings.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 9:19 pm to Timeoday
Now there is a fricking shocker.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 9:51 pm to dstone12
Obama and Big Mike do not ever want strong democratic leadership to replace their hold on the party.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:06 pm to Timeoday
And this is how Google stays on top. All that info going thru their servers they can use for their benefit
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:21 pm to TBoy
quote:
So what are republicans trying to distract from? Is this about Hegseth’s wife sitting in on briefings? I see. This is old. Wonder what the distraction was from at the time.
dam son
You don’t deserve the pic
Posted on 5/5/26 at 12:21 am to OldManRiver
quote:
You guys ever really pay attention to the videos these tweets replay?
Of course not.
Popular
Back to top

11








