- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NYT is communist: Only concede giant Mao banner was "inappropriate"
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:42 pm
quote:
NEW YORK, NY—In honor of the anniversary of Chairman Mao Zedong's death, The New York Times unfurled a giant, 50-foot-wide banner honoring the "brave revolutionary" outside its New York offices Monday.
After public outcry, they admitted this might have been "slightly inappropriate."
"While we stand by our decision to honor one of history's great men, we admit the banner lacked important historical context," said one Times editor. "While his ideas were morally right, they factually killed a bunch of people, and that's not something we wanted to promote. Unless you're killing yourself to combat climate change."
LINK
And he waits
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:44 pm to Roaad
quote:
one of history's great men
quote:
Chairman Mao Zedong
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:45 pm to Roaad
I had a feeling that was the source.
NYT would never apologize for such as thing.
NYT would never apologize for such as thing.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
I mean. . .great as in hugely important
Hitler type of great, not Churchill great
Hitler type of great, not Churchill great
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:46 pm to Roaad
That's gotta be farked right? The Onion? Because no way even the NYTs is this fricking brazenly stupid.
No way.
Could they?
If they did then it's time to admit what they are.
No way.
Could they?
If they did then it's time to admit what they are.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:47 pm to Roaad
So the New York Times has a complete fit if Trump uses any positive words to describe North Korea's leader, but they consider Mao a great man.
Yeah, no hypocrisy there.
Yeah, no hypocrisy there.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:48 pm to Roaad
I mean, there are a billion and a half of them now. Imagine how many there would be if he hadn’t thinned the herd.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:49 pm to Revelator
Anyone who bothered to click on the link would know:
Which seems a bit racist imho.
quote:
The banner has been replaced with a large mural of Joseph Stalin.
Which seems a bit racist imho.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:50 pm to Roaad
quote:
Unless you're killing yourself to combat climate change.
wut
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:51 pm to Roaad
quote:
Got 2, it seems
It seems to be more than that, but be careful not to exceed your limit.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:53 pm to Roaad
I would say unbelievable.
But this is perfectly believable.
But this is perfectly believable.
This post was edited on 9/13/19 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:53 pm to Roaad
Is this real? This can’t be real
Posted on 9/13/19 at 2:55 pm to Roaad
He only killed 50 million with his communism, which the Times seems to think was a good start....
Posted on 9/13/19 at 3:07 pm to Roaad
Link is Babylon Bee folks.
But the best satire is believable satire.
But the best satire is believable satire.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 3:07 pm to dhuck20
quote:
quote:
Unless you're killing yourself to combat climate change.
wut
It’s a satire site.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 3:09 pm to Roaad
You know what's wild about this?
I wasn't sure right away whether it was Babylon Bee or real until I looked at the link.
I wasn't sure right away whether it was Babylon Bee or real until I looked at the link.
Posted on 9/13/19 at 3:19 pm to Roaad
I was triggered but now I’m ok.
This post was edited on 9/13/19 at 3:20 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News