NYT: Iran’s supreme leader more interested in pursuing nuke than his predecessor / father

This really does rally the liberals.

The old leader was very old, this new guy was going to be the next leader pretty soon, regardless.

Kill his stupid arse as well

If you've seen one Khomeni, you've seen them all.

Evil is evil and Iranian Imperialism is what lit this fuse....47 plus years of bloodletting and sabre rattling...is their own fault and will reap what they have sown.

So you are saying it would have eventually become a problem anyway.

And we have dealt with it now instead of waiting until they had an actual weapon.

Good for us.

Breaking News: NYT has the ability to read the mind of a man in a coma.

quote:

---

Breaking News: NYT has the abiity to read the mind of a man in a coma.

---

your point, illustrating how foolish the premise of the OP is assumes:

1) the one legged no lipped possibly damaged mind of a man in a coma even exists any more and is not just a cardboard cut out with a string in his back and other peoples words coming out when pulled now and

2) that the one legged no lipped possibly damaged mind man who "used to" be in more favor of a nuclear weapon than his father when he could stand in the background carrying on his homosexual affaris and talking tough about nukes, is still the same man if/when he wakes up and realizes he now has a target on his back that's burn scarred and the next time he supports nukes he might get another MOAB's shoved up his arse instead of a dildo.

Is there a single reason why we didn’t kill this piece of shite and the entire family?

Why would we leave his son in charge?

Yea, he’s totally going to bend to the will of the US and certainly not be more radicalized and seek revenge for his father’s death.

What are we doing?

If I was a country and a global power was attacking me and I knew a way to somewhat equalize the playing field I 100 percent would try to do so if I’m looking out for my country.