- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NYT: Greenland deal will allow US to build bases on Greenland
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:33 pm to bamadontcare
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:33 pm to bamadontcare
If we own our own land strategically around Greenland, and get access to mineral deposits that’s just about as good as complete ownership. The people getting screwed are the Greenlanders. Denmark will get a payday, but sounds like the locals want be getting lump sum payments.
0
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:34 pm to TDTOM
He could have had all of this without destroying relations with Europe. All of this could exist under the existing agreement, he got nothing new from acting like a spoiled child in front of an international audience. MAGA will try and spin this as a 4D chess move that he wanted all along. He failed to acquire Greenland and now they look foolish and have to spin the status quo as a win.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:39 pm to Ingeniero
Don't forget what Trump said, we're going to be in Greenland forever
Now Trump needs to get the Brits inline, the Brits are making preparations to handover Diego Garcia to Mauritius. Diego Garcia is where the US keeps heavy bombers and other military equipment and it's strategically located in the Indian Ocean
Now Trump needs to get the Brits inline, the Brits are making preparations to handover Diego Garcia to Mauritius. Diego Garcia is where the US keeps heavy bombers and other military equipment and it's strategically located in the Indian Ocean
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:40 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
He could have had all of this without destroying relations with Europe. All of this could exist under the existing agreement, he got nothing new from acting like a spoiled child in front of an international audience. MAGA will try and spin this as a 4D chess move that he wanted all along. He failed to acquire Greenland and now they look foolish and have to spin the status quo as a win.
He wanted to destroy relations with Europe. You aren’t very bright
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:41 pm to Ingeniero
Can we build them on some mineral concentrations? I mean a lot of excavation and site prep is necessary so might as well have it pay for itself
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:42 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
Apparently he is getting what he wanted. I don’t think you have done much negotiating
We’ve had a base in Greenland since 1943
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:46 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
The word sovereignty means it's our land. Not sure if that is the current case. I guess in theory they could kick us out unless we have sovereignty. Not sure about the rare earths.
This is the difference. The current agreement allows for military expansion after consultation. This gives the US land they can exploit as they see fit. Big difference
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:46 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
He could have had all of this without destroying relations with Europe. All of this could exist under the existing agreement, he got nothing new from acting like a spoiled child in front of an international audience. MAGA will try and spin this as a 4D chess move that he wanted all along. He failed to acquire Greenland and now they look foolish and have to spin the status quo as a win.
Change your login name to "usingmydelusion"
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:47 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
He could have had all of this without destroying relations with Europe. All of this could exist under the existing agreement,
Wrong
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:49 pm to uziyourillusion
MAGA has created a reality where he’s just never wrong
If he says a thing and does it, art of the deal
If he says a thing and doesn’t do it, art of the deal + 4d chess
If he says a thing and it’s just wrong, no he didn’t + TDS
If he says a thing and it’s dumb as frick, he’s just doing the weave + liberal media coverage + skyscreamer TDS
There’s basically no outcome in any scenario that the diehard sycophants won’t twist in their minds as total victory
If he says a thing and does it, art of the deal
If he says a thing and doesn’t do it, art of the deal + 4d chess
If he says a thing and it’s just wrong, no he didn’t + TDS
If he says a thing and it’s dumb as frick, he’s just doing the weave + liberal media coverage + skyscreamer TDS
There’s basically no outcome in any scenario that the diehard sycophants won’t twist in their minds as total victory
Posted on 1/21/26 at 5:52 pm to bamadontcare
quote:Europe hates us. They’re always going to, until the next time they need us to save them again.
He wanted to destroy relations with Europe. You aren’t very bright
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:00 pm to llfshoals
quote:
Europe hates us. They’re always going to, until the next time they need us to save them again.
frick Dem.
Out board Marxists adore Western Europe Islamic utopia.
Go live there. Why haven’t you left yet?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:07 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
He could have had all of this without destroying relations with Europe. All of this could exist under the existing agreement, he got nothing new from acting like a spoiled child in front of an international audience. MAGA will try and spin this as a 4D chess move that he wanted all along. He failed to acquire Greenland and now they look foolish and have to spin the status quo as a win.
Another retard.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:08 pm to kingbob
quote:
But we already can do that.
You sure about that?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:09 pm to Ingeniero
'Friggin' BS. Why set a precedent? Tariffs until they give it to ya!!
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:10 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
He could have had all of this without destroying relations with Europe. All of this could exist under the existing agreement, he got nothing new from acting like a spoiled child in front of an international audience. MAGA will try and spin this as a 4D chess move that he wanted all along. He failed to acquire Greenland and now they look foolish and have to spin the status quo as a win.
Even if everything you said is true, which it’s not, He’s still a million times better than the alternative.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:13 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
He could have had all of this without destroying relations with Europe
what a tard.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:13 pm to Ingeniero
I heard the next thing on Trump's list will be trying to purchase Louisiana from France.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 6:40 pm to Ingeniero
God help the SDV team that draws that duty station....
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News